Maybe it is just a free phrase to depict two entity, or it is a contradistinction between moral and immoral in conjugation with the law. This question remains juxtaposition among the philosophical postulation by different authors and writers. But examining this topic in this article won’t be a barrier or finality to the clash between them. Hence, let me give you a scenario of the bone of contention.

In this short excerpt, it requires that you figure out the good or the bad in the situation.
On the highway, an oncoming vehicle was approaching a valley where a factory is located. It is getting to the middle of the day when the workers are about retiring from work. That is, most workers are preparing to evacuate the building; on the other side of the road is an orphanage home where kids are raised. The dilemma occurred when the vehicle’s brake failed and the driver is on a cross road either to swing the vehicle into the factory or the orphanage home and kill those grown up workers since they are pretty old and about to die while saving those young lads in the orphanage home.

Source

Questions:

If the driver should run into the factory and kill those workers base on the intention that they are old folks, would that intention be justified?
What about if he thought that since those kids don’t have parents and they might probably worth nothing at the end and rush into the orphanage home saving labor forces who can determine the economy of a state, would that intention be justified as well?
Overall, what will be the moral justification and will it be good or bad to declare such actions moral?

Let me know in the comment box what you think about the juxtaposition of moral, what is good oppose to what is bad in your point of view putting into consideration this scenario. Remember all suggestions are subjective and open to criticism.