You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Dlease experiment: the follow up!
So even with 58% voting efficiency, you cant still go in positive.
Not very encouraging.
What would be the required eff to be in positive?
So even with 58% voting efficiency, you cant still go in positive.
Not very encouraging.
What would be the required eff to be in positive?
I would need to earn at least 6.14 SP per day with curating posts. If you really would fine tune the voting times I probably would be able to get to 4.5 to 5 SP per day. But this would also mean to stop upvoting posts with smaller values. And just upvotes the big posts in time with 100% of my VP. Not willing to do this!
So, I do think that one can make it profitable. Like I wrote my early leases were too short, increasing the daily costs. So wiht the right leasing approach the daily cost could be decreased with around 1 steem.
If I would combine both tactics, I could get break even or a smal profit.
!BEER
Cheers,
Peter
Thanks for all the BEER!
I think that the reward curve is also doing its part. If you go for a large amounts ... like 300k or 400k SP, than you will reach that limit and will go in linear .... so with those amount maybe it would be profitable with not as big voting eff ....
Now we need to find someone willing to test this out :)
I do know an account which has leased 95K SP. He is earning around 50 SP per day from curating.
But I have no clue how much he did invest in the leasing.
Also no idea how much he did earn before the leasing.Probably around the SP I am earning today.
View or trade
BEER.Hey @dalz, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @fullcoverbetting for you. Enjoy it!