You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: [burnsteem100] Ode to the Stillness - a poem by ChatGPT

in #burnsteem256 months ago (edited)

The thoughtfulness of this poem comes more from your prompt and less from AI.

Maybe we need a moderated community where people can share their AI generated content?

Interesting idea. Instead of being hush-hush about it, it should be allowed under regulation. An example was a contest recently organized by a friend that included small use of AI and it only opened a can of worms. People are scared of it taking over which in my opinion is not possible.

Sort:  

Thanks for the reply!

The thoughtfulness of this poem comes more from your prompt and less from AI.

and

People are scared of it taking over which in my opinion is not possible.

In general, I think these are important points that people tend to miss. It's not "either/or", it's about finding the optimal balance of human intellect and machine augmentation. AI is just a tool.

For this poem, I was really surprised and impressed by the AI portion of the contribution, though. It included details and imagery that probably never would've occurred to me, unaided, and it referred back to them - in order - in its closing section. I gave it themes and feedback, but the AI really did the heavy lifting. And I'm half wondering if it really did pull some of those ideas forward in time from Walt Whitman in some sense? Was that structure characteristic of his style? I don't know poetry, but maybe...

Interesting idea. Instead of behind hush-hush about it, it should be allowed under regulation.

I wish I had time to try and get a community running. With luck, it might even increase organic engagement in the comment section. As always, the risk is spam and reward-farming. Maybe such a community could use things like requiring minimum burn percentages or subscription payments to a multikey community moderation account in order to limit spam.

After the reply from @steemcurator02, I'm thinking maybe the way to start would be with a "prompt engineering" community, and then building from there.

it's about finding the optimal balance of human intellect and machine augmentation. AI is just a tool.

That's the gist.

And I'm half wondering if it really did pull some of those ideas forward in time from Walt Whitman in some sense?

I'm not familiar with Whitman's work but that's entirely possible.

I wish I had time to try and get a community running.

Totally understandable. Running a community is no easy task. Maybe you could do in future with a clearer vision and with some help from people who share the same vision.

Maybe such a community could use things like requiring minimum burn percentages or subscription payments to a multikey community moderation account in order to limit spam.

I still think burning should be done on large scale by bigger accounts to get significant results. (It's a debate for another time.) I'm really intrigued by this "multisig" development. I just read a couple of articles through the link you attached. As much as it makes sense to use it for AI themed community, it's completely viable for the rest as well... I'm curious as to why this feature is still not used by communities heavily supported by steemcurators.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 61059.95
ETH 2677.49
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.61