Brain drain or brain gain?
For the first time America has overtaken. In 2016, China has published about four hundred and four million articles. America has four million and nine thousand This golden era of science history has earned China more than just America. But surprisingly, about thirty-forty percent of China's best-known young men work all over the world. China's brain drain? If so, then how much after the brain drain, why did the chicks rise up with such a shock?
source
No one is seen by looking at what you see in the six, which is inverted. When someone sees the problem in the world, nobody sees the possibility. What we call brain drain, China is called brain gain! The Chinese government wants more and more children to spread around the world. That's a radical change in their education system. Chinese youth do not hesitate to study in their own country and travel to Europe and America. The Chinese government spends thousands of crores of dollars to send meritorious youth to America. About ten thousand young people from the country come to America only in the Exchange Research Program. China's children, at the age of 26-27, end PhD from Europe-America. For our country's children it is 30-32 or more. Ninety-nine percent of children in China come to learn higher education abroad and successfully complete. For the students of Bangladesh, it is much less (perhaps less than fifty). Many children fall away from the country after leaving the country's jute. Because, the meaning of education is imbalance!
The Chinese government has launched a number of projects to bring the country's best talent back to the country. Merchants can apply for funding those projects from abroad. Competition is paid for meritorious researches. More benefits are given to them. The country's universities or research institutions have not been filled with red-blue parties. China's plan is that their children will learn from the best of the world's best institutions. China will take advantage of the benefits of these children to return to their home country.
In my opinion, there is nothing called 'brain drain' in this globalization era. If we can gain knowledge, we can go to work in the society directly and indirectly. Apart from that, society does not care for its potential, it is not patriotism to kill its potential from reading society! Rather, where merit can be developed, wherever it is grown, it can be done in a variety of ways for its own country. Moreover, nothing can be given to the country without being developed. If Jahid Hassan of Bangladesh did not come to America, then Zahid Hasan could not have been. Princeton University could not be professor The firmion could not be discovered. If Saif Islam did not come to America, then UC-Davies could not have been Professor. Similarly, Saif Salahuddin could not have been at this young age UC-Berkeley's professor.
The government of developing countries can not provide enough money for the study of all students. Can not afford the opportunity. So there is no alternative to developing countries for developing the merit of the developing country's children. China's many children have taken this opportunity from all over the world. Still taking it. They are taking this opportunity with their qualifications. Their country is making them suitable for taking advantage of this opportunity. China has stood like this in the last fifty years. India is standing like this. Bangladesh has to stand like this. Many children will be able to read abroad easily if they improve the quality of internal education and research. Many children will not fall out while studying abroad. The youth will learn from the developed countries with their own efforts, talent and labor. If the state does not want to bring them back with their little privileges, then they will be able to blame others by killing their own destiny. That will not change the fate. If taken by the state initiative, brain drain will be multiplied by not having brain drain. That's why the universities and research institutions of the country will have to work.
@francophonie voted for your post (16.67%).
More info