The Dragon Awards made a colossal mistake: it caved to the whims of writers who disrespected their fans.
Alison Littlewood and N.K. Jemisin withdrew their novels from the Dragon Awards nomination. John Scalzi, who initially withdrew, decided to withdraw his withdrawal. The former two claimed they were being used as proxies in the culture war. Scalzi came back because the organizers asked him to reconsider.
This isn't obvious to outsiders, but these are classic social justice entryist tactics.
The Dragon Awards was conceived of as an award by the fandom. No gatekeepers, no entry fees, no backdoor politicking. Just fans nominating their favourite works.
None of the major SFF blocs -- PulpRev, Superversive, Puppies -- had any intention to destroy the Awards or drag personal politics into it. The recommendations they made were in good faith. None of them recommended Littlewood, Jemisin and Scalzi; those works do not meet their tastes -- but they didn't go out of their way to actively discourage people from nominating the trio either.
The fans of these authors nominated them in good faith. By withdrawing their stories, the writers spat on their own fans.
Littlewood and Jemisin demonstrated that they didn't have faith in their audience. In Littlewood's case, she believed that she was nominated because Vox Day, the most controversial blogger in SFF, recommended her work. Jemisin claimed there was "no way to know if [her] book’s presence on the list was legitimately earned through individual, freely-chosen votes by a representative sampling of DragonCon members."
Littlewood is saying that she didn't want fans with the wrong politics to read her works. Jemisin's rationale is utter nonsense: there is no way to enforce block voting over the Net, and Dragoncon had measures in place to prevent repeat votes. Jemisin was simply posturing to her loyal fanbase, allowing her to win the Hugo Award.
It seems odd that a writer would accept the Hugo Award for her latest novel, but refuse any chance of winning a second award for the same novel. But that's because the Hugo Awards have been converged.
The Hugos used to be about recognising the finest SFF works. But for three decades and counting, it's been about recognising the most propaganda-heavy message fiction produced by the most superficially diverse group of creators. The Hugo Awards is where SJWs in SFF go to congratulate themselves and shut out everybody else -- it's little wonder that the number of nominating ballots and final ballots dropped by 50% from last year.
Social Justice Warriors aren't going to fight fair. They want the rules to be changed in their favor, and in so doing change the nature of the organization they are targeting.
By pushing for the right to withdraw their nominations, these entryists want to change the Dragon Awards from a fan-centric award to a talent-centric award -- an award dictated by the whims of the people involved.
As for Scalzi's case, when he first tried to withdraw, the Awards' organisers refused. Then they changed their minds and allowed the withdrawal. Then they asked Scalzi to reconsider. This flip-flopping signals that the organisers lack spine, and aren't willing to enforce their own rules and standards. Organisations that cannot stand fast will bend to suit the whims of the outrage-mongers.
In my last post, I stated that while you may not care about the culture war, the culture war cares about you. This is what the opening shots look like: an attempt to influence the targeted organisation to abandon its mission and serve the whims of those who will not respect their fans.
I don't want the Dragon Awards to go the way of the Hugos. Nobody from the fandom does. We must roll back the entryists before they can gain a foothold.
John Scalzi cannot be allowed to win an award. If he wins, it will galvanise his fellow social justice warriors, giving them incentive to put even more pressure on the Dragon Awards next year. I would urge you to vote instead for Brian Niemeier's The Secret Kings. Nemeier is one of the leading indie SFF authors of this generation, and should he win the award, he will cede it to L Jagi Lamplighter, whose work catalyzed the Superversive movement.
The Dragon Awards' organisers must enforce their mission through a clear and unbendable withdrawals policy. Either they prevent authors from withdrawing once nominated, or they allow withdrawals on the understanding that it will irrevocably bar those authors from ever being nominated for the Dragon Awards again. I am personally in favour of the latter: any author who withdraws his work from a fan award has betrayed the trust of everyone who deemed his work worthy of the award.
The Dragon Awards is for the fans. Anything that compromises that cannot be tolerated. It's time to kick out the entryists, enforce the core mission, and get back to celebrating the best of SFF. Life is too short for drama like this.
I am grateful to my fans for nominating NO GODS, ONLY DAIMONS for the Dragon Awards under the Alternate History category. If you'd like to check it out before voting, you can find it on Amazon here. When you're ready to vote, click here to sign up.