You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Debian/Ubuntu: apt versus apt-get

in #blog7 years ago

I used to use aptitude more than apt-get because it automatically cleans obsolete packages for you and it combines a number of apt-* commands.

But apt-get was always the recommended tool by Debian, especially when doing a dist-upgrade.

I think apt was introduced in Debian Stretch and I've been using that for a while now. I like its ouput more than the other tools, but unfortunately it doesn't jave all the commands and options yet.

So I keep switching between apt and apt-*, but no aptitude anymore. I've been using Debian for 15 years now, so it's no problem for me but I can imagine it can scare new users.

Sort:  

When I first tried linux, it was thanks to Caldera Linux (if memory serves right) in 2002. To be honest, I was so afraid of it, that I didn't touch linux again until 2007 with Ubuntu 6.10!

aptitude is scary to be honest, I've had to reinstall Ubuntu 5 times in a week, because I didn't know what I was doing xD

But thankfully, I picked up a book and a lot of tutorials over the net, and 10 years later I can say "thanks for apt" and "thanks for apt-get"!

Thanks for taking part :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.26
JST 0.039
BTC 94961.12
ETH 3386.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.36