The American revolution?...what revolution..?

in #blog6 years ago

IMAG0033.JPG

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws"

I always saw the American revolution as a world changing event....I used to anyways.

The founding fathers were people of vision, intelligence, and integrity. Giants among men.

They were also naive, which I can see now.

Naivety is the curse of those with integrity -The failure to see the machinations of lesser more devious minds, and underestimating them.

While they wrote down truly mind blowing wisdom for the world so see ....The corrupt took no heed.
Regardless of their well intentioned vision, the wheels of the Rothschilds carried on turning..

It is both a glad and disappointing revelation, to where my research has led..
Disappointing for the obvious reasons, as you will read.

But glad also - for this shows a pattern of events we (pre internet), were never really privy to.

As such we had no reference points. As such we were kept naive by the lack of information.

But now is not then, and now we do have information.
We do not have excuses anymore...

IMAG0033.JPG

.... these failings by the founding fathers. (it pains me to even type that)....means we can see where their naivety led them.
We don't need the intelligence that they possessed (phew!), we need to see how their intelligence still blinded them to events.

And learn from that. And fight accordingly.

On the website of the Federal Reserve Bank, a document entitled

‘Documentary History of the Bank of the United States including the original Bank of North America’.

The document informs us the Bank of the United States opened in Philadelphia.
December 12, 1791, with a 20-year charter.

The Federal government had a 20% stake in the first Bank of the United States.
The Federal government sold 2,780 of its shares in 1796-97.

.......and later, the remaining 2,220 shares were sold to one Mr. Baring. (1802)

The document states the 1802 sale of shares “was sanctioned by a vote of the House of Representatives, .
.....although it was to a foreigner.
An Englishman.... one Mr. Baring

....U.S. Government archives ..... “Baring and Company of London and Hope and Company of Amsterdam” states that...
“Alexander Baring of Baring and Company was given powers of attorney for entering into negotiations with France and the United States.

An English banker was given the job of negotiating The Louisianan purchase!(1803-5)
On behalf of the USA.

After a $3 million down payment in gold, the remainder of the purchase was made in U.S. bonds - which Napoleon sold to Barings - through Hope & Co. of Amsterdam @ 87½ per $100

....back to the Rothschild’s,.....

The charter of the first Bank of the United States ended in 1811 and was not renewed.

This essentially cut off the Rothschild and Baring influence in the United Sates.

Nathan Rothschild of the Bank of England issued this statement to the United States in 1811.

He said, "“Either the application for the renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”

IMAG0033.JPG

A year later came the War of 1812 - between the U.S. and Great Britain.
It was, essentially a Rothschild family war against a specific country. The USA.

In 1815, the charter was renewed and the war ended, giving back to the Rothschild family control over a private central bank in the United States.

Revolution?........ What revolution?

Sort:  

Curated for #informationwar (by @stevescoins)
Relevance: Deep State - Banking background
Our Purpose

He said, "“Either the application for the renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”

This is a fascinating quote. This is a fascinating subject. I'd like to investigate further. Could you please reference the source of this quote? @ironshield

But what happened after 1815? The story did not end there. And it is important to remember the fight between them after 1815. How were the American Founding Fathers naive, as in compared to what, to third world countries or to what is happening in the EU right now similar to what happened to Europe centuries ago? And what happened in the USA in 1913 is a more important question than just 1815 because 1815 was not the end to that chapter of the whole story. And I don't know why you would end with 1815 and not talk about what happened between 1815 and 1913. And more importantly, what happened after 1913 is also crucial in understanding Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Bill Gates, Bilderberg, CFR, and more.

But what happened after 1815?

Gimme a chance -I can only post so much a day ! lolol

And more importantly, what happened after 1913 is also crucial in understanding Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Bill Gates, Bilderberg, CFR, and more.

In crucially understanding post 1913, you have to know more about the back ground -i.e. pre 1913.

That's why I'm writing the posts I am in the roughly historical order - oldest first...for people who don't know much about the subject, to get to see the bigger picture..

....the more solid you are in background material/knowledge, the better to clearly see what's 'in the now'.

Can't wait for the next segment that will feature the hero Andrew Jackson. The only successful stop of the money monopoly that didn't end in the death of the President. They tried, and he called them out on it as well.

I agree that 1776 was not the end of the ongoing saga between good and evil and also between patriots and elites. Reminds me of Assassin's Creed.

Soros and Rothschild.

I love your posts. Thanks.

Another commendable post. I came to this post through a link send by you to my comment on your post. Obviously, the Rothschild family is considered the wealthiest family in the world. Conspiracy theorists say that they sponsored Duke of Wellington in the battle of Waterloo and they were also involved in creation of Israel. They also say that the Federal Reserve is a private bank on which US government have no control. I don't know how far these stories are true but the most horrific tale they say about them that super rich persons have decided to reduce the world population so that this earth may be saved and for this they are instigating wars in which millions of people will expire, similarly they did in Syria and middle east. What do you think about this?

Thanks a lot.
...here are some post you might be interested in....
These are not conspiracy theories, these are record.
( I haven't done a wellington /Waterloo post, but again these not conjecture, but facts. Rothschild multiplied his wealth many time over on the knowledge of the result of the battle of waterloo, before anyone else knew this information.)

https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/the-american-revolution-what-revolution
https://steemit.com/blog/@lucylin/russian-revolution-s-and-the-rothchilds-part-1

All the wars since Napoleon have been instigated to either transfer wealth (destruction/ construction cycle), or to further centralize power toward one world government...(imo)

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."
Gutle Schnaper
Mayer Amschel Rothschild's wife

Money is the route cause of many problems humanity and this world face. Thanks for your response.

I disagree.
Money has no intent, good or bad. It is just a tool. It isn't the cause, it is the tool used that is caused by the evil intent of people.

All the problems come from man.

(to be honest, I think it's the 4% of sociopaths that are main culprits - and they are present in all societies all across the world)

I agree. I was pointing towards man's greed.

I think the 4% are greedy - the rest of us just want to improve our lives as we go along.

I think everyone is honest till he gets time to be dishonest. This is the real nature of us.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 59207.83
ETH 2464.61
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43