Let's not confuse marxism with business....
With the recent purge and deplatforming - and downright draconain actions from enematube, fuckbuk, and twatter, it's time for people to realize this has nothing to do with anything except the marxist push.
What this highlights is that these mega companies are nothing to with business, but political ideology.
It makes no commercial sense to execute the actions the y have, over this last week, and the past months..
It make TOTAL sense if you see these companies as part of the Marxist plot and NWO strategy.
It won't work of course. While alt tech will not let it succeed, the lack of action or words from the Trump government is worrying.
I put that down to him being a little busy with other things at the moment.
Another reason they won't win this battle of course, is that they are stupid, and made up on the worlds natural losers.
They win at everything until they have competition. Then they're royally screwed.
It's not in their make up to compete - They hate it.
And the sane are now competing. The marxists don't have a chance, but will continue double down - because they have nothing .
They have no imagination... ( one of the traits of psychopaths, interestingly...).
All they can do is to carry on what they know already. Lies, spin, and subterfuge.
The land of imagination, flexibility, and thinking on our feet, belongs to us..
I'd almost feel sorry for them, if only they weren't such scum...
And lets not think it's just social media companies that are part of the Marxist push...NOOOooooo
They are everywhere...
Marxism only works with total control of a population...
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call
Ways you can help the @informationwar
I see this as these companies destroying themselves, any of them can be the next myspace. It's not really a free speech issue. No one really needs any of these companies and they are free to kick anyone they like off their platforms. And we are free to create new and better forums if that is what consumers demand.
See how that's sort of a stupid question?
gun company and drug company comparison are not working, sorry. Because of the product they promote:
Gun company: "Here, buy this gun for protection"
If the gun does not work, you can turn it back in and get a refund.
If you use the gun as a shovel in your backyard and you complain that it doesn't work because you were using it for something except its intended purpose, you are an idiot and won't get a refund.
Drug company: "Here, buy this medicine it's going to cure you"
If the drug doesn't work you or even hurt you, it is extremely hard to get compensation.
If you for example overdose etc, that is on you so you are not owed compensation if you disregard instructions.
wrong, you can sue for overdoses and it is easy.
https://www.painkilleroverdoselawyer.com/opioid-painkiller-lawsuits/opioid-painkiller-litigation/
anyhow you missed the point of the analogy, drugs was not even a part of it, the comparison was guns and vaccines because both have special legal protections from being sued.
Ok, I didn't know that - thanks for the information. Here in Scandinavia, it's virtually unheard of for pharma to be sued due to overdosing. Do stupid things and you are responsible kind of deal.
Maybe I misunderstood you, but you wrote: "If guns work then why aren't gun companies held liable for shootings?"
Which isn't the same thing the OP put forth which was: "If vaccinations work, why are drug companies not legally liable for causing any health problem?"
Guns are tools to shoot with, ie gun companies shouldn't reasonably be held responsible if their customers use the tool as intended (or unintended even). What is the objective of a vaccine/drug?
the answer to both questions is the same: If they were they would go out of business from defending frivolous lawsuits and then we would not have any makers of guns or vaccines, we need guns and vaccines, so the makers are given protections from liability by law. However in the case of vaccines although the makers are shielded from certain claims those claims are adjudicated in their own process and damages are paid for out of a fund, recently a little girl was awarded over $100,000,000.
....the difference being that you can't be both a unbiased open forum and a publishers, with bias - they conflict...
there will only be unbiased open forums if that is what people want, if they are what people want then that is what the market will favor. One possible response, besides the obvious choice of using a decentralized network like STEEM, would be for right wingers to create their own alternative forums and social media platforms and for all the forums to be biased and for everyone to insulate themselves in ideological bubbles.
I suddenly want a bogdanoff mask
@lucylin Thank you for not using bidbots on this post and also using the #nobidbot tag!