Fixing your own mental illness....A perspective from someone who was mentally ill. SESSION 1.

in #blog6 years ago

Have you ever noticed that in life - the answers to seemingly massively complex problems, often have their solutions in simplicity?
This is how I discovered my own mental illness, and my own 'recovery'...

temp.jpg

I grew up in a very capitalistic/free market family. Farmers. Generally, the effort and labor you put in, you reaped the rewards later.
I was always a self motivator, and I lived that lifestyle.
At 12 years old I had to have an IQ test to win a scholarship to a private school, which doesn't matter too much, but it comes to bear later..
I was employing people at 15yrs old ( before I left school , my weekend business that I started) and then went on to employing lots of people over the years.

In conflict with this life, I was also educated in the marxist school indoctrination system, and as such had conflicting thoughts. That's not actually true, thinking about it - I had no conflicting thoughts.
I 'believed' in socialistic principles.
The conflict came from my actions, and how I lived my life. But there was no conscious conflict ...not for a while anyways..
I was somehow living a capitalistic life, while 'somehow' also believing in socialism. ( I first took a look at marx's 'Das Kapitial', when I was 16yrs old ).

This continued for years. Far too many in hindsight, but hey, I'm not apologizing for being mentally ill...
As long as we keep learning...and healing...

I think a little background into who I was, and where I was mentally- helps to explain the process I am going to explain, and hopefully help people.

It will look very simple on it's face - AND THAT'S BECAUSE IT IS - but is a synthesis of decades of experience, and thinking very deeply about these issues.

You get the shortcuts!

I truly believe that around 90% of people in this world are essentially - fundamentally - good. A default setting, if you will.
That can be altered through manipulation. They BECOME the 'useful idiots' of this world - of which I was one..

temp.jpg

4 % or so of the population, are just 'not wired' in the same way.
This is a fact.
(research stats and psychology of the sociopaths, psychopaths, and extreme narcissists, if you don't believe me..).

temp.jpg

So this post is forgetting the 4% section (and possibly growing) and just concentrating on the good people of this world...
(there are ways to turn the tables on the 4%, and manipulate them to serve, but that's a different post altogether).

temp.jpg

Back to cleaning your head,

(and my personal journey...)

Simplicity is the key. And not avoiding simplicity.

A...The problem..

The belief in your own intellect, when attached (unwittingly) to your ego and insecurities.
YOU can always find a better answer than simplicity offers - because YOU are way more intelligent, right?
....and this then proves your own intelligence to yourself, and at the same time, you can seek others to validate it. (validate yourself , in other words)
Karl Marx is a great example of this.

B...The solution...

Detach your intellect from your ego.

How to get from A to B...

Establishing basic, simple, principles clearly in your own head. Cast in granite principles. Just the basics( for now..).

1/ Is personal freedom a right?

That is a 'yes' or 'no' answer. Anything else is just your intellect and ego trying to muscle in. This is your very first 'stand your ground moment', if you are hearing them ganging up on you..

2/ If freedom is your right, then so - by extension of that freedom that is yours - is freedom of speech, freedom to associate and freedom to distribute the fruits of your labor as you see fit? Do you agree?

Anything except an answer of 'yes' or 'no' is your ally (your intellect), joining forces with your other ally (your ego), to then become your enemy.

temp.jpg

SO... ( agreeing on the personal freedom principle), anything else constructed must first pass this litmus test. There are no grey area's. If it fails it, well, that would be your ego, intellect and insecurity in this world, conspiring.
What else can it be? - if you know the truth of this most basic right of all men? (and women... I'm in a non triggering mood).

If they fail this test - but your intellect still insists on twisting things (with the backing of your ego), you then know that you are suffering from mental illness.
We have already established that the personal freedom principle is a fundamental right and this is a constant. Non negotiable.
Any inconsistency against this constant, developing in your own mind are symptoms of your illness, nothing more.

Insisting in your own mind that this is a basic truth, and fundamental principle for to all men (and women) and refusing to ever deviate from it, regardless what your intellect and ego are screaming at you - is the first step ( in many steps ) to fixing your own mental illness...

Simple uh?

If you do not believe in the inherent freedom of all peoples, that's your choice ... but like I said, I'm not addressing this post to the sociopaths, psychopaths, and extreme narcissists...
(Feel free to offer a reason as to why you don't think freedom is a right for all..).

temp.jpg

CLEAN YOUR HEAD....

Sort:  

Well written post. I'm glad about the way your personal journey worked out. Funny thing is that I myself published on a similar topic just about an hour ago: https://steemit.com/psychology/@vimukthi/a-deep-dive-into-the-link-between-social-movements-and-mental-health

Happy Steeming!

Cheers - Ill go check your post...10 minutes later...read it -followed!

1/ Is personal freedom a right?
That is a 'yes' or 'no' answer. Anything else is just your intellect and ego trying to muscle in.

I disagree with this for the simple reason that suggesting a question is a yes or no answer, when there are possible caveats, is in fact imposing your ego on the question.

What you are saying in essence is that I see it as a yes or no answer, therefore you should too.

For instance personal freedom is not a right if you assault or kill someone, or steal from them.

So I would say personal freedom is a right if you are being a fundamentally good person.

We have already established that the personal freedom principle is a fundamental right and this is a constant. Non negotiable.

Clearly it is not as stated above. This isn't ego it's just practical and common sense. Wouldn't you agree?

Cg

Loading...

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Well, this is really hard...

Why is Marxist reasoning so desirable, so pulling you in?
I mean, you hear it, and it all feels good.

You want to help out the working class, and the rulers, who they get you to believe are the "factory owners" are so easy to paint as the bad guys.

It is insidious.

Most factory workers have no clue how to run a factory. If the factory owners didn't exist, the product and the job wouldn't exist.

But, it is so easy to say that those rich people are keeping us down.


And, what i hate most, is that most of these little people do not want everything to be equal, and everyone to have a little bit more, they want their turn at being rich.


Further, we have half of the race who really doesn't want freedom.
Monkeynomics 101: Freedom is Death (for women)

Loading...

Errm, not "crazy idiots" but "these little people" from your superior-to-them intellect, obvs. /s

False consensus bias:

[...] Additionally, when confronted with evidence that a consensus does not exist, people often assume that those who do not agree with them are defective in some way.

Sound familiar?

Cg

it does...but not how you perceive it..

temp.jpg

Or from the viewpoint of trying address someone with ego/ intellectual issues...

Teacher - IS the sum of 2+2, 4? It's a yes or no question. It's very simple.

Pupil 1 = purple
pupil 2 = zebra's
Pupil 3 = Newton's law

Or another way of looking at it...

Teacher - Asking if everyone has the right to freedom is the same as asking if 2+2 = 4 or if a chess board only has black and white squares.

Pupil - Yes but it's not, because that is assuming that all people are the same. Even if you rule out the small percentage of psychopaths and sociopaths in society. There still might be a situation whereby that's not a black and white question. I mean my answer is yes, however there will always be a but not if situation..

Teacher - You do not agree with me, ergo you are mentally ill.

Pupil - [sigh] and you have no idea what the word teacher means.

Cg

lets finish with a 'yes' or 'no',shall we?

Can you do that, or do you not have the conviction? lol

What is very interesting, is that ALL the people who ever disagree with me, and then decide to unvote an upvote.. have

100% ....been on the left....

Quite fascinating - ...almost like temper tantrum or something...

Quite fascinating - ...almost like temper tantrum or something...

I removed my upvote because of the way you keep insisting that not believing in your premise makes me mentally ill. I also removed it because of your cartoon mocking me which I regarded as pretty childish.

When I don't agree with someone, I don't attempt to mock them because it doesn't move the debate anywhere. Plus of course it alienates the person you are debating with, and comes across as a 'temper tantrum'.

I voted for the article in the first place because I often vote for things I don't agree with. However it is your reaction to my disagreement which caused me to change my mind.

The fact that you call it a temper tantrum further illustrates the fact that you are completely unwilling to even give my counterargument a moment's thought. Choosing instead to ignore my points regarding the semantics of a yes/no question. Even though I've done my best to address your points.

100% ....been on the left....

You are obsessed with this whole left and right thing. To the point whereby you have come to the conclusion that anyone who is on the left is devoid of a sense of humour, and is mentally ill.

As I've stated before I do not consider myself to be on any side. I simply take each situation on its merits. I don't agree with most of what you say, however I still vote for you and attempt to engage you. I see his is healthy discourse as it shields me from only ever conversing with people that agree with me.

Like I say though, disagreeing with me is fine. Mocking, and ignoring the fact that I have answered you, well that's just pointless to me and is not something I want to endorse.

lets finish with a 'yes' or 'no',shall we?

As I've stated a few times now - Yes everyone who is behaving in a way deemed acceptable to society does have a right to freedom.

That's as simply as I care to put it. :-)

Cg

Loading...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63098.94
ETH 2621.87
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74