A strange case of Darwinist depression...part 1

I am a product of the cultural marxist education 'factory', and there is not a lot I can do to change that fact.

However, what I can do , is now look from a different perspective - one much different than from the one that was offered to me when I was just a young 'fact sponge' - absorbing all the information unquestioningly that was supplied to me by my so called 'teachers'.

Growing up in a non religious house, and it playing no part in my life to any extent, Darwinism was a theory easily taken on board, accepted piecemeal, and moved on from.
One of those 'proved science' things...
( and Darwin's explorations possibly being the very basis for the whole 'climate change theory'. More of that later...)

So while religion was never part of my life, I also knew my history, and was more than aware of how it shaped society, in terms or morals, ethical behavior, culture, countries, etc.
My take on things was very much a Darwinism is a fact, and religion (referring to Christianity) was a very good social construct to help keep society cohesive, peaceful, and 'civilized'.

But I now have some niggling questions abut Darwinism, that I just can't 'put to bed'....And I hate niggling questions...

I watched you tube last night ..(okay it's not a 3 year study of the subject, but this is the start of my 'niggle'...)

I can offer most arguments against religion (v's Darwins theories), and while the mathematical probabilities of cell formation, amino acids, chemical compounds all being in the right place at the right time... etc, etc.. are compelling arguments against Darwin - It still doesn't change the fact that wild probability outcomes can, and do, occur.
That's why probabilities exist in math...durr.

So that's not the niggle...

No, it's much worse than that. Because this one is about common sense...

While the theory of evolution still holds for me in terms of species (as in we are part of the ape family, and the wolves and your pet 'fido' are all part of the canine family, they have just evolved differently), I find a hole in the all encompassing theory.

A humongously big freakin' hole..

Time and crossover.
As in the evolving of one organism into another (fish to frog for example).

It isn't that I can't see the possibility of it, but it is that I cannot see any evidence for it. And herein lies the problem.. for me..

You see, IF Darwins theory of evolution was a fact, then we would see a 'forever evolutionizing ' of species, all in their various stages.
Time didn't start at point A, stop, then skip a few million years, and start again at point B.
No, the fish would be in various stages of evolving to amphibians, reptiles to mammals...(ok, I accept that the duck billed platypus may be an example of this evolutionary process...but one example in a whole evolutionary cycle of millions of life forms, 'forever morphing' organisms is just not enough.)

If this theory was correct, there would be millions of lifeforms in the intermediary processes of changing from one thing to another... And plenty of fossils to confirm this...
There are none.

Commons sense tells me that we have been seriously hoaxed - and victims to a propaganda psi op...

....This of course - logically - leads on to some very VERY big questions, doesn't it,?...the why's...and the who's...?

....I see a rabbit hole....

And so down I went...
...bugger...

Part 2
Darwin.....his associates...and a big picture...