You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Battle of Athens: A History Lesson on Guns
The ownership of an inanimate object cannot in any way compare to the "ownership" of another human being. This is quite possibly the most disingenuous, emotive, and frankly evil argument I have ever heard from the anti-gun side of things. So congrats on that. Way to completely shit on the struggles that former and current slaves have gone or are going through.
But if you want to talk about entitlement, what entitles you to tell innocent civilians in crime-ridden areas that they are not allowed to have efficient means to protect themselves and their loved ones from gangs, thieves, and murderers?
What is the end game after pushing people into mass graves? What other reason it's there to disarm a populace?
Or do these gun grabbers think they won't be buried as well?
The gun grabber response is purely emotive. They see a problem, and they want to fix it. It's coming from a good place, but because they aren't using their reason they just wind up screaming, "DO SOMETHING!!!" instead of actually coming up with workable solutions that would really help people. Like allowing teachers who are also CWP holders to carry on school grounds. That would protect students, cost the state no money, and wouldn't be forcing anybody who didn't want to, to carry a gun.
The people they're being useful idiots for, on the other hand, definitely have a plan, and it's just "more power," because that's always the way with tyrants. They just want more power for themselves and damn the consequences, and eventually you wind up at North Korea or Nazi Germany. Which is why an armed populace is so important to prevent things like that from happening. If you can stop Hitler before he takes over the Party and becomes Chancellor and has the full might of the military behind it, it counts just as much as stopping him at the height of his power while the gas chambers have been working for years.