Results of Quality

Categorizing the quality of a person's effort can be a simple task, simply judge the results according to parameters such as usefulness, functioning, details, and dedication, all these elements are denotable from those results, and their identification is simpler when there is the possibility of comparing different results with each other, or putting them in contrast with a frame of reference. However, obtaining "good results" is a task completely independent of each person, in that sense we are all different, having different levels of understanding, knowledge, and reasoning, we can stand out in areas that people like us can not. In this way, the obtaining of good results of people will depend on their capacity to attend them and develop them efficiently, thus being able to stand out much in certain areas, but to be very below the average in other areas.

The issue of the quality of results in specific areas, in addition to the different capabilities of each, is determined by the interest, dedication, and effort that is applied to achieve it, in a certain way we are all able to achieve what someone else has done and what we want to achieve, the difference in this is that each cost more or less time and resources depending on their capabilities. However, when we really want to achieve something the capabilities we have are not a major problem because we strive to the maximum to get it, thus being able to achieve things we did not know we were capable of, in these cases time is a great constraint, generally when we really want something we propose a medium or short term plan, because long-term ambitions are difficult to sustain and easy to alter over time. So the medium-term aspirations are those that have the greatest degree of impulse to achieve them, but this has a negative side and is that there is less time to develop a plan that gives us greater likelihood of achieving it, so we can only give our best efforts to make our results are of the highest possible quality.