RE: Daily Dose of Sultnpapper 03/03/18> Maybe we need to ban groups not guns…
What about banning the FBI?
stefan molyneux did a good explanation how the FBI has failed to prevent it from happening, it seems they observed the shooter since 2014, yet they let it happen anyway... To damn busy with constructing lies and bullshit for the Clintons.
If anyone is to blame for 17 dead people then it is the FBI.
And when you allow people to own guns then a good education about guns also wouldn'd harm. I'm not sure how that is done in the USA.
I'm glad that there are less guns in europe, still I see the advantage of actually owning a gun. The gun policy in the USA is a bit alien to me though.
Also the news coverage of the shooting i find a bit unrealistic, news people exaggerate and act like they care, but switch so fast to the next item that you can see they actually don't give a shit. dead people is just another day at the office and good material to get more viewers.
... That's my perspective as seen from a distance.
The gun policy in the USA goes all the way back to before the country was founded. People had guns and the founding fathers of the USA knew that they were creating a form of government that had the potential to be corrupted and oppressive to it's citizens if the wrong people got elected, so they made sure to include the protection of the right to bear arms so that if the citizens ever needed to defend their freedoms they would be able too, plus be able to protect themselves from any other danger.
The FBI in just a rogue agency of thugs who work for the president or work against him in some cases, like this president.