Why are you lecturing me on ethics when you think that language or code is ethical by its own? You had an analogy of fishermen competing/working to catch fish, implying clearly the same rhetoric from your steem ethics philosophy post about 2000 words not earning as much as 5 words and then from that analogy consistent and reflective of how the reward pool functions you asserted without missing a beat or any kind of logic that "you can kill whomever you want because your bigger". I'm not the only one that pointed out all you have is a dilemma about equity, another person was Surprised that you denied what was obvious.

You can keep repeating that ethics are based on property rights as if there was anything in anything I said that was counter to that. You can also keep saying that you never "mentioned" equity and deny the obvious implications of whining about 2000 words not earning as much as 5 or that "it's not free market" as if catching fish from the ocean does not give you ownership over the catch.

Which property rights are violated or who's consent is violated for it to be an ethical issue? Again, you refuse to answer the basic question regarding your nonsensical absurdity of "nobody owns the ocean therefore it's not ethical to own the catch", but you're not fooling me and those who are keen on what ethics are. Code is not any more moral or ethical than any other tool. Only action is moral or ethical, and all action has an author, not only do you not have anything to point to as who's consent or property rights were violated, you don't have anyone to point the finger at for your alleged ethical issue to blame for it.

Posted using Partiko Android