You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Do Blockchain communities have a "Critical-Group" ?
Interesting. I anxiously await the simpler article that @dantheman referred to to make these concepts clearer.
Out of curiosity have you encountered the work of Robert (Bob) Podolski? He also has some interesting ideas on how to organize groups to achieve goals I think you might find interesting.
Thanks a lot for reading and commenting
For now, I only have the numbers related to Dunbar's cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships is around 150.
Others like Bernard–Killworth studies have estimated the number of ties in 290 in a person's social network.
That's why the polarization of alike equalitarian groups and guilds on steemit is so positive and help to preserve the initial spirit of the concept of Freedom Cells, networks sharing a common understanding of all the solutions to build a free society.
The alternative is to turn into a total hierarchical society (that normally breaks its functionality after 900 ties) or totally loose the speed of reaction and growth.
So the way the community is reacting seems the most important sign that we are on the right track for now.
Thanks a lot for the tip of Robert (Bob) Podolski, that I think is related to the movement of Free Cells, that brings me more light to this subject investigation( I have to buy the book, the introduction was stimulating).