You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Proof of Stupidity | Revolutionary Consensus Algorithm
@blck0 you also have this: https://binded.com/
Personalty, didn't try it yet but seems the same.
And @briggsy habing something locked in the blockchain has nothing to do with copyright. Nevertheless, treating digital art as something unique (like cryptocurrency that can't be copied, which would go against it's purpose) may be one way to do it, who knows.
I know that locking something on the blockchain doesn't mean it is copyrighted, but rather in the case of someone arguing that you stole their work when it was your own, the blockchain allows a person to defend their right to ownership, and thus Steemit serves that purpose.
To be fair there is no way to prevent something digital from being copied. every time it's accessed on the internet it is copied. encryption does help solve this for 99% of users, but that doesn't require blockchain to do, you are correct.
If anything, Kodakcoin only helps to immortalize the Kodak brand name for an otherwise dinosaur brand. Kodak really did try to keep up with their Kodak share and series of printers and digital cameras.
Yea and they're bringing ektachrome back to life as trial sell this year. I wish they done that some years ago when I had time to shoot film :p