Sort:  

I think I know him a lot better than you.

I doesn't seem so. So far you have shown zero evidence that Michael has done anything good for Bitshares.

By keeping up the association between Michael and Cryptonomex you indicate that Cryptonomex is scam organization that shouldn't be trusted. It's really hard to understand what motivates you to do that.

Maybe being controversial is Stan's conception of marketing? If you apply to the letter the saying that "there is no such thing as bad publicity", then Bitshares has received a lot of such "publicity" and Stan obviously appears to be thrilled about it. What's next? Is Cryptonomex in touch with Josh Garza, Mark Karpeles, Bruce Wagner, CoinHunter/RealSolid and ButterflyLabs folks? Imagine the buzz to have them around as trusted Steem ambassadors!

Actually, when you have been in this arena as long as I have you learn that everything is controversial. So you get good at ignoring folks who mean well but just don't have all the facts.

As a wise mentor once told me:
"Play the game for where things will end up when the dust settles."

:o)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.12
JST 0.028
BTC 64024.15
ETH 3515.24
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.55