You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [pybitshares/uptick] How to add new on-chain features
class Committee_member_create(GrapheneObject):
Is there a specific reason why pybitshares break the python convention on class names? This should be CommitteeMemberCreate for example. :)
Yes, the reason is that I don't want the developer to manually provide the OperationID for that operation and instead obtain it automatically from the list of operation ids by using the operation name:
https://github.com/xeroc/python-graphenelib/blob/master/graphenebase/objects.py#L19-L38