You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Jeff Berwick On The Bitcoin Vs. Bitcoin Cash Debacle
You know there are people who held their life saving in Bitcoin and that were furious on the development going nowhere except making things worse from their point of view as well right? For some of these people Bitcoin Cash as such was a life saver.
Maybe we should put those of you from both camps who like to yell and scream in the same room for a little while and then rest of us can go work on solutions together.
Is working on solutions together flagging comments without discussion or at least telling the reason for that behavior?
There is no requirement that everything we do is a collective action.
I downvote whenever I see something that paints with too broad a brush leading to great misdirection or harm for example and that's both my right as a stakeholder and also nothing anyone can stop. "Flags" is a Steemit specific concept that I don't think should be recognized just because we use the Steem blockchain.
Unlike on r/Bitcoin for example, here you won't be banned simply for expressing a positive opinion about BCH, or in fact for doing anything. But you are gonna have to deal with the votes of stakeholders with other opinions than you.
You didn't expressed a positive opinion about BCH and didn't do anything either. You just flagged instead of having a conversation with some arguments.
But whatever. I don't think it's worth talking to you furthermore....
I've expressed myself enough in comments here already. Also, downvotes are indeed a form of expression.
Edit: Ok, I've left a comment under your initial message here now just to explain some of my disagreements if they were not already known to you.
But that's enough for me currently. Leaving comments to explaining every action takes precious time out of my day, as I'm sure it does for you too.