Why Does SVET Movement Exist?
We have to build a city's sustainable governance system based on algorithms - not leaders or representatives. At the same time we, of course, can't enforce this system. We only can make it more competitive than the alternatives.
There are always be people with charisma and extraordinary abilities which will stand out from the rest of us and will try to grab political power one way or another.
Some of them might start a successful business or social organizations which become so big and influential that citizens might want to delegate them a governance authority. That is fine unless the cities main algorithmic governance protocols are not breached.
There are three major levels of city's political governance - global (changes in protocols, UBI, external relations, public health, environment, city's expansion and defense), municipal (infrastructure maintenance, courts) and local (policing, education, science, business etc). Our prime objective is to prevent a creation of hackable 'power silos' on any of those levels.
We can achieve that by distributing decision making process among all citizens and across all three governance levels using algorithmic consensus mechanisms as much as it is financially affordable and technologically possible at the present level of the computer science development.
That leaves us with the question what if we face the situation when such type of 'algorithmic consensus' governance becomes economically unaffordable, socially unpractical or politically impossible and we can't make them work better.
Imho, it means that this part of city's population which sees it that way (because everything is a matter of public consensus or an absence of such) must either return to their home countries or to join (or to form) an another city-state with different (might be authoritarian) governance models.
We only have to ensure the absence of violence during the intermediary (exodus) period and continuing peaceful and economically viable relationships between new city-state and the old one. That is, basically, the rule number 6 - political forking.
That is the future.
Today, however, we face more urgent questions among which are:
what is this proposed system main design and what types of consensus we shall use on each of the three levels of governance and how to make them work together most efficient way within the limitations imposed by the known trilemma of decentralization, scalability or security?;
how to build and implement such an algorithmic system on the politically independent territory;
and, of course, 3) how to obtain this territory and gain its political recognition from one of the existing three main nuclear power states (or at least from one of them)?
To solve those three questions SVET movement was created.