Top 3 cryptocurrencies conspiracy theory

When the Ethereum boom took place this year, I wasn’t too happy to see the list of Ethereum supporters in the “Ethereum Enterprise Alliance” (Entethalliance) as some of the companies listed there have taken part in the Bilderberg meeting this year or in other years or had some sort of links to Bilderberg.

Not to mention that while the cryptocurrencies really started booming as of March, I was frequently listening to Bloomberg radio, where they were presenting nothing about the boom of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, I only found out in June, from other sources. That is why I stopped listening to Bloomberg after finding out that this spring, there was a market skyrocketing and yet Bloomberg wasn’t saying anything about it. 

Satoshi Nakamoto’s  safe and relatively simple Bitcoin obviously didn’t get publicity from the Big Banks or other Bilderberg related companies, yet the useful but more vulnerable Ethereum, all of a sudden does. And not long after this alliance was created, proof that Ethereum was vulnerable surfaced, which caused it to go down. I was glad that Ethereum didn’t manage to surpass Bitcoin and that the simple and secure king was still Bitcoin. After reading what Segwit2x would be doing to the original Bitcoin, suddenly a scenario in which Bitcoin is about to be taken over as a result of Ethereum not managing to surpass it, became plausible. Segwit basically makes Bitcoin less secure than it was. 

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@modprobe/i-looked-into-segwit-and-here-s-what-i-saw

We don’t know who Satoshi Nakamoto is but we know that he might have access to around 1 million Bitcoins, and he seems to have been a well-intended individual or group, trying to decentralize and in a way privatize the banking system. Sure, there could be the complex conspiracy that Bilderberg could also be behind Satoshi Nakamoto, but I don’t see anything in support of that. 

Here we have an actually pretty plausible conspiracy theory, I had thought about it before but the author has also done pretty good research:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6ulaq8/bitcoin_bitcoin_cash_a_conspiracy_theory/

I now find out that Bitcoin Core’s development team actually does have ties to Bilderberg and that Bitcoin is dealing with a hard fork that could weaken it or that it was supposed to weaken it. The good part about Bitcoin Cash is that it doesn’t modify the original Bitcoin too much, however, we don’t know who is behind it, it could be anybody. One of the “recommended” wallets on the Bitcoin Cash website, Electron Cash, which had a logo that could be mistaken by some for Electrum Cash already proved that it was actually a vulnerable wallet and in fact no trustworthy software wallet with a history had been provided. 

https://squawker.org/analysis/secrets-of-bitcoin-cash-who-are-the-miners/

Even if the original Bitcoin was made by a probably well-intended Satoshi Nakamoto, what we have now with the highest market cap, Bitcoin with Segwit, Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash no longer look as decentralized, trustworthy and safe, particularly as of November.

 Let’s hope that I’m not right, in the end before the Bitcoin fork I had withdrawn everything from Bittrex and sold it for fiat just to be safe, in case manipulations were done in a vulnerable moment. It is obvious though that I had made the wrong decision in the end and that actually Bittrex proved to be very trustworthy, actually giving users Bitcoin Cash equal to the Bitcoin that they had, making Bittrex very popular in the process. A downside of what has happened was the closing of BTC-E with what I see as an abusive claiming of jurisdiction by USA and a dangerous precedent, now leading to Bitfinex giving up on US customers. Surely the death of Mt. Gox in 2014 led to the downfall of Bitcoin at the time, with all of these less than ideal forks and potential closing of trading websites, I don’t know if these aren’t actually blows to try and kill or take over a Bitcoin that was designed to resist being killed or taken over.  

Particularly as a holder of both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, I can only hope that I am wrong. I fear that the fork in November could cause new problems too. I fear that all of the top 3 cryptocurrencies that dominate the market will actually have Bilderbergers behind them in November, even without Quantum computers and I will be keeping a close eye on the situation. Knowing the US based centralized monopoly that the globalists want to have, am I really that wrong though? I personally would like to see Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash being managed in Asia and not in USA. Currently I will be holding Bitcoin Cash more than Bitcoin, even though I don’t know who’s behind Bitcoin Cash, simply because it’s the closest to what Satoshi Nakamoto wanted it to be and the furthest from what the Bilderbergers want it to be. Not to mention that the mining difficulty is much lower and it is now much more profitable to mine Bitcoin Cash than Bitcoin.

If anything will smell fishy, I’m pretty sure that eventually the community will realize it and switch to the most reliable truly decentralized system, because more than anything, cryptocurrencies must bring the power from the Big Banks back to the people.