Let’s start with the definition of the word “fraud” from Google

And from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud

In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right.

It can mean only a person who has been convicted. A conviction can be a felony or a misdemeanor.

In some jurisditctions criminal record experises.

I can imagine a situation when someone spends 10 years in jail for fraud in one country, but in another country, the case was dropped, and suing in that another country just because.

You can even get a certificate from Bogota

Still frame from the CoinGeek video.

Horse is as everyone can see.

There was a book, the first edition was published in 1745–1746: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nowe_Ateny

Nowe Ateny is the source of a few memorable and amusing "definitions", often quoted in Poland to this day:

Horse is as everyone can see.

The humor was probably unintentional by the author. Rather, he did not see the benefit of defining for his intended audience the most common animals of the time and place.

Around that time horse was a common animal, especially among the guys who can read and can afford a book.

Craig Wright is a fraud as anyone can see.

At the same time, a potential rebuttal is simple and indisputable. Legal systems are complicated. Bitcoin is simple.

Therefore, the burden of proof is shifted - it is now Craig Wright's responsibility to prove that he is who he claims to be: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/05/03/bitcoin_craig_wright/

I'm from the reality where I invented the Craig Wright who invented Satoshi Nakamoto.

But how can you prove that the Craig Wright who wrote the article is Craig Wright?

Don't trust. Verify.

PS. "I remember reading about it" https://www.google.com/search?q=craig+wright+i+remember+reading+about+it