You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Very Disappointed in Bitcoin
I am very very careful about what I write on r/bitcoin. I remember a post on r/btc explaining that the main resources are controlled by the same person, hence the censorship.
I generally think that bigger block would have made less issue altogether but the proposals are getting more and more complex.
This is a sad state of affair for Bitcoin.
It looks like a total Bankstercoin.
yeah. I am NOT looking forward to the 1st of August.
*Edit: the most important word!
I am not, I don't really like how UASF could give even more power to the estblishment.
The establishment are Jihan Wu with a marketshare of 70% (!) of the mining equipment and Roger ver controlling the most important domain name bitcoin.com. Acting as his BUllshit is the real bitcoin.
just realized I forgot the most important word on my sentence. I am surely not looking forward at all. I have a feeling the users in UASF haven't grasp the propositions enough. What we want and need is scalability and that bitcoin stay true to its core value!
Well either way it's out of our hands, I am not a node so I have no authority.
Well the last frontier is the nodes, there is still some democracy there, but if the information is supressed, then that is no good.
A democracy is worthless if the information to make rational decisions by nodes is censored, I have to write a post about this because it's so important.
Free speech is the foundation of true freedom always. Also keep in mind the idea of 'two wolves and a sheep voting for what to have for dinner.'
Pure democracy can be just as bad without solid principles behind it that must never be violated.