UASF Revisited: Will Bitcoin's User Revolt Leave a Lasting Legacy?

in #bitcoin7 years ago

From Coindesk

Attention this week has so far focused on a group of bitcoin users that successfully split off the blockchain to form their own cryptocurrency.

But fascinating as the real-time market creation of Bitcoin Cash has been, for those who have closely watched developments, August 1 marked another lesser-acknowledged milestone – the passing of the deadline for a controversial scaling proposal Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 148.

That's when a vocal group of users had scheduled a so-called "Independence Day." The goal was to push through a long-stalled coding optimization called Segregated Witness (SegWit), designed to increase and redefine the network's capacity. The software upgrade would find node operators (users who store transaction history) initiating the move, hoping to lead the way for miners and startups.

And while it's faded a bit into the background, you could argue that, even amidst a busy season for scaling proposals, BIP 148 was perhaps the most influential.

The scaling "agreement" Segwit2x followed soon after, proposing to add a feature that BIP 148 wouldn't have provided: a boost to the block size parameter. Bitcoin Cash was even more explicitly a response to BIP 148 – hence, why both were scheduled for the same day.

But those two proposals had one other thing in common, and that was giving some degree of power over the software transition to the miners that secure the blockchain.

Before its introduction, for example, SegWit had stalled for months due to its reliance on the idea miners would signal support to activate the change. However, only about 25 to 50% of mining pools did so from November to June.

Then, suddenly, two weeks before the scheduled UASF, and with little time to spare, mining pools rallied around either Segwit2x or BIP 91 on its own, to activate SegWit.

UASF supporters don't see this as a coincidence.

Blockchain startup founder Ragnar Lifthrasir, a public UASF proponent, told CoinDesk:

"UASF worked as designed and predicted, it is activating SegWit."

Read more here: https://www.coindesk.com/uasf-revisited-will-bitcoins-user-revolt-leave-lasting-legacy/
Follow @contentjunkie to stay up to date on more great posts like this one.

Sort:  

well this just shows that bitcoin is not compatible for scalable use, this is also one of the reasons why i think ripple will succeed when this market has a lot more volume in the future

This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Aug 03. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $7.70 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Aug 03 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.13
JST 0.029
BTC 57068.68
ETH 2988.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.27