The Ultimate Visual Guide To Bitcoin's Dirty Secret

in #bitcoin3 years ago

Bitcoin Coal

Bitcoin has a dirty little secret. An enormous 'inconvenient truth'.

It was reported today that Al Gore's 20-room, 10,070 square-foot mansion in Nashville consumes 21 times more power than the average USA household.

In other words, Al Gore uses a plenty of energy. And yet, his entire mansion could be run, for a full day, using the power that it takes to perform a measly 3.3 Bitcoin transactions!

Bitcoin Electricity

Note: I have nothing against Al Gore. It's not as if he's got a coal plant in his backyard for God's sake! Shrill media alarmism as opposed to smart big picture thinking. But this is more a story of Bitcoin's much more significant environmental sins.

Bitcoin may be heralding the dawn of a new financial age, but it's the cryptocurrencies equivalent of Dirty Coal.

In fact, a single Bitcoin transaction uses the equivalent energy of burning 0.02 tons of coal. Yuck. Think of that next time you whip out some Bitcoin to pay for your Cappuccino

There better not be any environmentalists using this thing!

I'm a big fan of Bitcoin (or rather, what it has started), but I do think it has more than a few significant problems. I'll be unpacking these in future posts - along with good things about Bitcoin too, of course.

For now, I wanted to illustrate a simple picture of Bitcoins energy problem with one or two simple infographics. It should soon become clear why it's already gobbling up 0.07% of the worlds energy consumption.

Perhaps Bitcoin has more in common with an Oil Rush, than a Gold Rush.

Let's look at 3 simple infographics to give you a sense of the problem:

Using 1 Bitcoin Transaction's worth of energy, you could drive a Tesla 64 miles (103 km). That's 38 times back-and-forth over San Francisco's Golden Gate bridge!


Golden Gate Bridge

Using 1 Bitcoin Transaction's worth of energy, you could binge watch James Cameron's epic 3h 15min Titanic on your TV a whopping 594 times:



1 Bitcoin Transaction produces as much energy as 1.4 lightening strikes



If Bitcoin is going to lead the way into the future, it has to address it's horrible environmental problem. If it doesn't, it could be at serious risk of being overtaken by more promising Crypto's like EOS and Steem. Which are far more efficient alternatives.

About the Author: Hello there! I'm CMO of a high growth tech company, with investments in gold, silver and cryptocurrencies. Let's rip the face off the future together (science, money, tech, design). The more I'm followed, the more time I can spend on articles like this :)


BTC may take a lot of energy to complete transactions, but IMO no one really cares...(but the miners that are using and paying for the energy). The mining farms can invest in solar panels. Most investors in BTC could care less about the energy that it takes to execute transactions.

Congratulations @butlerbuzz! You have received a personal award!

2 Years on Steemit
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.

Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @butlerbuzz! You received a personal award!

Happy Birthday! - You are on the Steem blockchain for 3 years!

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!