You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bitcoin Unlimited looses 13.2 BTC due to bug Forking Network and STEEM/BTS TPS comparison to BTC
And yet BU is still gaining miner support against Segwit /r/bitcoin is lying and censoring people to push there agenda in an attempt to centralize Bitcoin using the company Blockstream. Look up who are Blockstream's largest financial backers. Then look up the CEO's of those company's other ventures.
Could you please cite some sources here directly? It would make it much easier for the rest of us to look things up.
(I upvoted just so your comment is visible on Steemit)
Here you go. Ty for the upvote friend.
I am going to post this on Steemit when my post limit is up.
The too-big-to-fail insurance giant AXA is one of the main owners of Blockstream - and they're throwing around millions of dollars to any dev / troll / censor who opposes Satoshi's simple and safe roadmap for on-chain scaling (ie: bigger blocks via hard forking).
But fortunately, we can "route around" Blockstream's censorship and centralization: Once >51% of the network uninstalls Blockstream's crippled Bitcoin client, and installs a Bitcoin client from Unlimited or Classic that accepts bigger blocks, then the market (and not some clueless devs at Blockstream, paid by central bankers) will again be fully in control of the Bitcoin blocksize (and volume and price).
Blockstream is now controlled by the Bilderberg Group - seriously! AXA Strategic Ventures, co-lead investor for Blockstream's $55 million financing round, is the investment arm of French insurance giant AXA Group - whose CEO Henri de Castries has been chairman of the Bilderberg Group since 2012.
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/47zfzt/blockstream_is_now_controlled_by_the_bilderberg/
If Bitcoin becomes a major currency, then tens of trillions of dollars on the "legacy ledger of fantasy fiat" will evaporate, destroying AXA, whose CEO is head of the Bilderbergers. This is the real reason why AXA bought Blockstream: to artificially suppress Bitcoin volume and price with 1MB blocks.
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4r2pw5/if_bitcoin_becomes_a_major_currency_then_tens_of/
The insurance company with the biggest exposure to the 1.2 quadrillion dollar (ie, 1200 TRILLION dollar) derivatives casino is AXA. Yeah, that AXA, the company whose CEO is head of the Bilderberg Group, and whose "venture capital" arm bought out Bitcoin development by "investing" in Blockstream.
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4k1r7v/the_insurance_company_with_the_biggest_exposure/
Greg Maxwell used to have intelligent, nuanced opinions about "max blocksize", until he started getting paid by AXA, whose CEO is head of the Bilderberg Group - the legacy financial elite which Bitcoin aims to disintermediate. Greg always refuses to address this massive conflict of interest. Why?
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4mlo0z/greg_maxwell_used_to_have_intelligent_nuanced/
Who owns the world? (1) Barclays, (2) AXA, (3) State Street Bank. (Infographic in German - but you can understand it without knowing much German: "Wem gehört die Welt?" = "Who owns the world?") AXA is the #2 company with the most economic power/connections in the world. And AXA owns Blockstream.
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5btu02/who_owns_the_world_1_barclays_2_axa_3_state/
Bitcoin can go to 10,000 USD with 4 MB blocks, so it will go to 10,000 USD with 4 MB blocks. All the censorship & shilling on r\bitcoin & fantasy fiat from AXA can't stop that. BitcoinCORE might STALL at 1,000 USD and 1 MB blocks, but BITCOIN will SCALE to 10,000 USD and 4 MB blocks - and beyond
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5jgkxv/bitcoin_can_go_to_10000_usd_with_4_mb_blocks_so/
I think the Berlin Wall Principle will end up applying to Blockstream as well: (1) The Berlin Wall took longer than everyone expected to come tumbling down. (2) When it did finally come tumbling down, it happened faster than anyone expected (ie, in a matter of days) - and everyone was shocked.
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4kxtq4/i_think_the_berlin_wall_principle_will_end_up/
I'm not even close to being through with that, but I have to admit at least; That's a lot better sourced than I expected. Goes to show what some of these "pizza investigators" don't get.
I have been a aware of what Segwit has been trying to do for a while now. My thinking is that I am not against SW and I do think it will get implemented any time soon on the BTC BC. At the moment it is not needed as you can't really buy stuff with BTC because of the price volatility. At the moment it is a store of value and a speculative vehicle. They need to test SW on Lightcoin or any other alt coin to prove proof-of-concept. At the same time we need to fix the temporary fix of a 2010 problem that is the block limit. Bitcoin has to scale to meet the global need and SW and larger blocks are the solution to this. Follow me or if you want I will tag you when I put the post up on Steemit. I have followed you.
You look like a solid follow, but don't be shy to tag me. You seem to have a potential frenemy/ally of the dark force in @lordvader btw. =)