RE: Not so @smartsteem: Transparency and adherence to rules required?
I paid for my bought vote internally
Where can the community see this? How much did you pay?
There was no time to send it as transfer because blocks were not synced due to node-problems.
Bullshit. You did not wait 30 minutes and so cannot say 'there was no time' or predict 28 minutes into the future that the nodes would not be synced.
That is YOUR reason why we introduced the curation limit - not mine or smartsteems!
Wrong. I said it was a feature. You exploited a rule stated on your website which has cost your friends and auto-voters curation rewards.
Which means: delegators received even more money from the manual vote.
The focus is not on your delegator customers, I'm sure they are very happy with your maximisation of reward pool rape, sending this bid to 'promote' your post to the few actually accessing the Blockchain at this time.
We seek transparency and clarity, not the opposite. We as witnesses, must try to do as honest a job as possible, and what you did yesterday is not even close.