burnt again? I have stuck it out since very early on and in the longterm view dan has not in any way burned those who stuck with him.

The difference is that in AGS you could not trade the token. As far as I undestand it you can claim them and TRADE them. This will create artificial shortage like GNOSIS and Dan is well aware of it.

This will definitely be interesting but at the same time i'm not worried about it....because the team should get some benefit just like satoshi did with his(?) genesis block giving 10% of all bitcoin to him. It is kind of odd to me how in this space people have an expectation for devs to not engineer in a way to get a strong cut. I want my dev to be so stacked with my token that I know buying his loyalty is gonna be mighty expensive. I guess it is just two different persectives though :)