You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How to Allocate the Worlds Resources Fairly
So it's all basically for a circle jerk? Or are people voting on these things expecting a reward but in turn getting axed because of the way it's run?
I bet you people are voting on these posts for perceived curation rewards.. And if what you've written above is true the rabbit hole just gets deeper and uglier. -_-
We can't really prove why people (and/or the bots they control) are voting in any particular instance, but I seriously doubt that to any significant degree significant stakeholders or bots run by significant stakeholders are still making such a costly error as to vote for these posts for the purpose of earning curation rewards. Seven months is long enough for people with real money at stake to figure out how the system actually operates. Dust votes may be, but that's not where the rewards are coming from.
It seems to fall somewhere between popularity votes, misplaced idea of getting rewardd for upvoting it or simply mindless upvoting for our fearless Dev.
Either way I'm sort of thinking it's a wee bit laughable at this point on both dan's and the communities behalf that we're just circle jerking some of the highest level account holders into positions where they can collect more money to dump on the market later after they announce news to stimulate buys.
I honestly hope I'm just looking into this all far to much and seeing things that perhaps are figments of my imagination.. Sadly I don't think this is the case though.