Completely agree. That's the only reaction any human decent being can have to pointless murder.

We need to install benevolent systems that supplant the malevolent systems. There's always a deeper level that we can escalate to. Call that TV show back, and let them know you want to make a show about "real freedom." If they can finance it, it wouldn't be hard to keep it interesting. ..Just effective counter-systems.

You might want to watch Berwick's interview with "Assassination Politics" author Jim Bell, and order a copy of the books by Daniel Suarez "Daemon" and "Freedom."

The term "anarchy" is unnecessary, and ineffective at getting people to vote "not guilty" in jury trials.

The only part I disagree with you on is that there is a heavy genetic component to sociopathy, and a heavy follower component to empath conformists.

I also highly recommend "The Law" -also about 100 pages, also free, here: https://books.google.com/books?id=DZKE3-pV1AYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Law&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi3iMaiqMvOAhXMQSYKHWHvCn0Q6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

When the abolitionists successfully made slavery unenforceable in Massachusetts and New York, via jury independence, that was functional governance. The entire system should be Jury-centric; nothing else is as relevant to pressuring the government toward freedom. Via initiative and referenda, there are many pro-freedom systems that we can write into the law.