You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Real foods for baby, especially your allergic baby! Part 2 – first solids.
These are all wonderfully information, my friend! I didn't know pureed meats are okay for 6-month olds. Here, it's mostly pureed veggies fed to babies until they get their teeth in. Nice to know that alternatives are available. I wish I have a baby right now just so I could contribute more to the discussion.
They really aren't okay for them, it's just unless you're feeding them a spicy pepper or literal battery acid you can eat it.
Meats been proven to have tons of contaminants and cause cancer, constipation in kids, and far worse things such as early puberty, which takes off years of their life.
Raw-meat and eggs is downright dangerous in every single way yet they recommended it. Stop reading articles with zero science or studies linked. These are just that persons opinion and what they do. I could tell you you can have sex with your baby when they're 6 months old and it's healthy to do so, but that doesn't mean you should do it. Where's the science?
The only thing that's safe for children long-term to eat that comes from an animal is gelatin, honey, and vitamin E. All the big "whole" forms of regular animal-foods fuck kids up, and really do adults too.
I'll happily provide citations of how and why, or comparison studies between out population and, say, the Okinawans, which traditionally ate only 1-3% of their calories from animal foods and lived the longest of any society, easily reaching into the 90s and often 100s, perfectly functional and able to walk with no cane and bend over and the whole shabang!
Yeah, so, no offense but there are tons of other ways to get your point across without being a dick. No matter how a person takes in information, it's really still up to them which they choose to do. Compassion is key, man, so if you really want to win over people, you could about things through a better approach. You make good points, but it's all overshadowed by your abrasive approach. If you have a contrary opinion, express it in a more diplomatic matter. I won't even dignify the other things you said with a response.
Being nice and skirting around the issue just encourages complacency and people pushing it off as if it doesn't matter. If someone is deeply wrong and told it their entire life simply telling them nicely isn't going to do anything.
Think, if I asked someone who genuinely believes it's okay to have sex-slaves and rape them "hey, that's really not nice those are people too and should be free to choose what they do" they'll just brush it off.
The same applies here. Unless you explicitly say it how it is and say how dead animals aren't good for health they'll almost always brush it off.
Funny thing, you do the other option, which is when you say it how it is, rather than addressing you piss off and refuse to acknowledge the truth or talk about it as a way to escape. An excuse.