You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Psychotherapist Doesn't Understand Self Awareness
Mate, you making yourself look stupid. You don't need to know "gender roles", because gender roles are assumed by the gender and might be wrong. You need to know their roles, which needs to be determined on a case by case basis.
You're shit at this bud.
Their roles? Outside the context of gender? are you listening to yourself, you just argued that gender roles don't need to be know, because they are assumed by the gender, and you need to know their roles, which needs to be determined on a case by case basis, just not gender roles, because those have the evil word gender there, just "their" roles, outside the context of gender, right? Give us some roles that are outside the context of gender that are determined on a case by case basis.
The role of being an engineer can be held by either gender, lol. If you don't know what the patients role is, you can ask and they will tell you, "oh I'm an engineer".haha
Burned again
And those roles are important to doctors because? Why would a doctor need to determine if someone is an engineer? Clearly you don't understand that removing the word gender from gender roles, breaks the concept, you're a dumbass and think that you hit some nail on the head with "gender roles don't need to be determined, they [gender roles] should be determined on a case by case basis".
Clearly, you don't know or have any relation to the issue you're writing about, this is akin to the sex talk topic which you thought blaming the progressives for was so astute, too bad you hardly recognize the impotence of a statement centered around progressives as a jab at specific people, but this isn't for your benefit, this is simply so a sensible human being can rejoice in truth.
you didn't read the thread.
You accuse me of not reading the thread because I pointed out a contradictory thought and your evasiveness, trying to hide the issue that you either resolve to determine gender roles, or you do not, performative contradiction much?
No because your question indicates that you didnt read the thread. I don't know what you're talkin about in the above comment.
Ok, my question directly related with your contradictory thought indicates that I didn't read the thread, without a why or how. Clearly my question indicates that you didn't consider the thought that you were writing down in the post that I didn't read, (why) because you think that gender roles don't need to be determined, but then argue that they should be determined, dumb ass.
If you had read it you wouldn't need to ask this:
The above is a strawman; I argued that their "roles" can be determined on a case by case basis, as the example given was regarding their occupations.