RE: Psychotherapist Doesn't Understand Self Awareness
I will never consider this person to be what they identify as, I will only ever consider this person to be a man, likely with a mental illness or trying a publicity stunt. Probably the former.
Armchair psychologist, better commit him right?
I will disagree on one point and that is the need to know gender roles (in the west). Because in the west at least, a person is free to choose what ever they want to do regardless of gender, and an assumption on their role, based on gender should not be made (and cannot be accurate). Their roles can be determined on a case by case basis. Gender is no longer required.
So you disagree that roles don't need to be known, but then tell us that they can be determined on a case by case basis, but why would you determine something that doesn't need to be known.
No thats not what I said. I said gender roles does not need to be known. The roles can be determined on a case by case basis, not assumed because of ones gender.
You're way off, but keep trying.
No its my opinion.
Cherry picking my comment again? Trying to elude that I am suggesting he be committed? The only thing suggested is that he needs professional help. You are wrong once again @baah, who is hanging themselves with their own logic?
I understand that you think that you are doing the world a favour but now you are just trolling.
I didn't cherry pick your comment, I remarked on your opinion. An opinion which was in line with the rest of the nonsense commentary as well, you opinion is that he needs professional help, should that be involuntary or voluntary is what I said.
The only thing suggested? How is only one thing suggested by "likely mental illness" in that context and what ever did you mean by me eluding that you're suggesting he be committed? Are you not aware of what mental illness entails and that it's not elusive but EXPLICIT what I said?
You resolved "no, that's not what I said" with repeating the same fallacious reasoning which I hanged you with in the first place.
Haha bud you hanged yourself. Youndid cherry pick the last line. You lost this one.
Yes that ridicule dismisses all arguments and questions, you clearly win with your impeccable "you cherry picked the last line, that means your conclusions are false" logic.
omg you think it's about winning, lol.
Regardless of what you think this is about, I will say this (about me), you can "ridicule" me if you like, I have thick skin. It is useful (right or wrong) to me, to understand that when I identify with an illusion, I am getting an emotional pay off from it, whatever it might be. It is useful to understand because I can avoid identifying with illusions. However that is just me. JK didn't come up with it and never claimed to. Also if you were including, illusions by TV networks and magicians and the like, you're being immature. It is to do with the self and self identification, but I think you knew that. I don't mind your questioning but don't be a troll, you end up looking like a knobgobbler (I use terms like this in a friendly way, if you are offended by them, ...well too bad).
I am glad you posted so people can go find out for themselves whether JK is a liar and a hypocrite. To me that is irrelevant, but people need to find out for themselves, thanks. That is why I didn't flag your posts, someone is using your name and cut and pasting comments, which I will flag (unless they are funny).
You can continue harrasing me if you like, but as I said I have thick skin. no probs, I have your number now , I know what you are.
is contrary to
If the roles don't need to be known, why would they be determined?
If you wanted to say that gender roles shouldn't be assumed by the gender alone, you wouldn't have said gender roles don't need to be known, then contradicted that a second later.
Mate, you making yourself look stupid. You don't need to know "gender roles", because gender roles are assumed by the gender and might be wrong. You need to know their roles, which needs to be determined on a case by case basis.
You're shit at this bud.
Their roles? Outside the context of gender? are you listening to yourself, you just argued that gender roles don't need to be know, because they are assumed by the gender, and you need to know their roles, which needs to be determined on a case by case basis, just not gender roles, because those have the evil word gender there, just "their" roles, outside the context of gender, right? Give us some roles that are outside the context of gender that are determined on a case by case basis.
The role of being an engineer can be held by either gender, lol. If you don't know what the patients role is, you can ask and they will tell you, "oh I'm an engineer".haha
Burned again
And those roles are important to doctors because? Why would a doctor need to determine if someone is an engineer? Clearly you don't understand that removing the word gender from gender roles, breaks the concept, you're a dumbass and think that you hit some nail on the head with "gender roles don't need to be determined, they [gender roles] should be determined on a case by case basis".
Clearly, you don't know or have any relation to the issue you're writing about, this is akin to the sex talk topic which you thought blaming the progressives for was so astute, too bad you hardly recognize the impotence of a statement centered around progressives as a jab at specific people, but this isn't for your benefit, this is simply so a sensible human being can rejoice in truth.
you didn't read the thread.
You accuse me of not reading the thread because I pointed out a contradictory thought and your evasiveness, trying to hide the issue that you either resolve to determine gender roles, or you do not, performative contradiction much?