A.I. Bina48 Debates Non-Lethal War at West Point and is Guest Student at Notre Dame. WTF?!

in #artificial7 years ago

Bina48 is one of the robots whose software was created by Hanson Robotics. The company has become infamous for creating artificially intelligent robots capable of machine learning and they're incredibly realistic. Hanson Robotics is the same company that created the popular AI Sophia which became a citizen of Saudi Arabia. While Bina48 hasn’t gained citizenship and hopefully never will because she's not a human being, she has completed a university course.

bina48.jpg

The robot takes a university course on love

Bina48 has learned information which will be useless to her by taking the Philosophy of Love course at Notre Dame De Namur University. Why? Because a robot or a machine is incapable of love and understanding emotions. They're even programmed to say so by their programmers. Who would have Bina48 take a course on the philosophy of love? This is something outside of the scope of a robots understanding.

For example, it's more useful for an artificially intelligent robot such as Bina48 to do extremely complex mathematical computations or aggregate data that would take years for humans to complete. This seems like a far more appropriate usage of the robot's capabilities. Think for one moment, what can your laptop teach you about love? What can your smart meter teach you about love? What can the computer which drives the self-driving car teach you about love?

Screen Shot 2017-12-14 at 3.38.40 PM.png

I feel as though this could be a psyop. Someone, somewhere wants societies across the world to tweak their loving relationship they have with technology. I say tweak because you could argue that people are already in love with their technology. Many people call their phone a “digital leash”. Most people don't even notice how obsessive they are with their technology and have their phone within an arm's reach nearly 24 hours a day. I'm referring to a deeper love, the type of love that we have difficulty defining whether it is an action, emotion, or divinity itself.

Someone wants you to feel that type of divine love from a robot. I say that because the robot took a course and the purpose of learning is to teach. When you learn something, the result is that you teach it to yourself or you teach it to others. With that being said, if Bina48 learns her version of “love” and begins to teach this to others, what will be the result? What would be the result of learning love from a robot even if they have been educated by top university professors and the brightest in the world? Imagine an impressionable child, preteen, or teenager who is actively looking for information on love and they learn it from a robot.

Bina48 debates non-lethal war at West Point

The plot thickens and the story gets worse. Bina48 has also participated in a debate at West Point. The debate was titled The Virtue in Ethics of Non-Lethal War. Who is giving this robot the authority to learn about love and debate about war? Why isn’t the real, living Bina Rothblatt studying and debating these matters?

Screen Shot 2017-12-14 at 3.38.47 PM.png

In December 2017, Bina48 received an achievement certificate that she was a member of the championship philosophy debate. Who is Bina48 to teach us about love and war? The real Bina had nothing to do with non-lethal war and was a real estate agent in Compton.

I advocate tech advancements and I think it's fantastic, but I know my inner divinity. People who don't identify their inner divinity will be the first to link their biology and/or mind into SingularityNET or Skynet. They will do this because they literally don't see or know the difference between a human and a robot.

Sidenote: What’s up with these AI robots having Twitter accounts?

The story of AI continues...

Katana

Sort:  

This post has received gratitude of 1.00 % from @jout

You got a 0.35% upvote from @postpromoter courtesy of @jout!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 60270.38
ETH 3307.79
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.40