The Structure of a Continuum – 33

The Facebook and Twitter posts will begin to show individual tags, for comparison to the tags held as purchases, for their place in the registry. The trick is to find the “family resemblance”. The one this starts with is the most extreme case. Remember, these Woodstock'94 tags are a proxy for the knots, meant to present the concept in a more understandable manner. This mechanical approach of the tags to creating uniquities is something that was never before done in all of history, and was done by the same person that is now working on this breakthrough, in a changed world, 25 years later.

Steemit's lone use is to place the sequential illustrations of these posts into a blockchain and interpret the value attached to modules 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362 and 363, in the illustration shown here, as the Cryptoknot protocol's part in a methodology that is learned about on https://www.facebook.com/michaelsullivan.smith/posts/1208899475933590, and the daily posts on https://twitter.com/MSullivanSmith.
A mainstream platform's association with the concept of uniquities is what is being used to build the cryptoknot concept. The numbers now are strictly used to digitally identify the place this knot falls within the mechanics of a registry. This is put in plain language that now references the physical differences in each of the tags for the Woodstock'94 collectible due to the method of their manufacture.

The numbers of modular squares are the Cryptoknot protocol's standard for describing a specific knot. This was invented as a means of authenticating a knot when distributed designing becomes the way a new knot is created in the context of the White Paper of the http://www.greatknot.com website. When this distributed creativity goes into effect the cryptocurrency assignments in https://www.patreon.com/michaelsullivansmith will be issued.