Quite the analysis if I've ever read one, really appreciate the time here taken to explain the philosophical debate within art critcism, "Is it art or trash?", the layman contends with the ordinary and the struggle of some laguid desposition of escapsim trapped in a world of bad definitions. Artists serve their respective crafts and possess a duty to divulge the roots of interpretation through the artwork they create. I rate this a fair explanation, one even a layman can cite, art is ways and means for itself to exist and artists create art -"things" - into existence.

Thank you @godflesh for sharing this insight!