☝#AntiGravity Part 6: Objects in Rotation Defy ‘Mainstream’ Physics + MES Duality Concept (Notes 1)

in antigravity •  5 months ago  (edited)

Video 1

Video 2

In #AntiGravity Part 6, I present the many findings and discoveries made during this past year and a half regarding gyroscopes and all things rotation in general. The discoveries made are on the face of them so simple yet shatter the most overly complicated notions of conventional mainstream physics and science in general. The simple act of rotation defies the very bedrock underneath all of conventional (public) physics. The concept of ‘inertia’ and how it is defined underlies both conventional Newtonian mechanics and Einsteinian Relativity. But the simple act of rotation allows objects to have the magical ability to ‘inertially’ lift upwards, forwards, and even downwards, all without losing additional spin speed and while generating incredible torque over unity yet also behaving ‘massless’. Objects in rotation prove ‘spin angular momentum’, ‘precessional angular momentum’, ‘mass’, ‘inertia’, and hence ‘gravity’ as separate entities are merely illusions; puppets in a puppet show where the puppet master always lay underneath: the Aether.

Understanding the true nature of such simple motions as ‘rotation’, which is nothing more than curved linear motion, requires exploring and firmly grasping the true nature of reality itself. From inertia and magnetism to even psychology, technology, and consciousness itself. This video and document, which I am self-appointing as my ‘Doctorate in Philosophy’ or PhD sets the precedent for true scientific exploration and the start of an investigation into the true nature of reality, which has been covered up both by those that rule this world and those that choose to be ruled. Hope you enjoy this epic journey!

Due to YouTube video length restrictions, Part 6 is split into two videos. The sections in the first video are shown below with their accompanying times in the video.

(1) @ 1:34 - Important Links and Notes
(2) @ 5:45 - Introduction
(3) @ 8:37 - Table of Contents
(4) @ 55:56 - #MESExperiments Science Experiments Video Series
(5) @ 58:08 - General Notes on Scientific Exploration
(6) @ 1:06:01 - Clearing Eric Laithwaite’s Name
(7) @ 2:25:11 - Eric Laithwaite’s Unconventional Interpretation of Newtonian Mechanics
(8) @ 3:06:30 - Cambridge University’s Bogus Fake Science and Coverup of Gyro Magic
(9) @ 4:04:00 - TOP SECRET: The Movie Inception and Spinning Tops
(10) @ 4:07:06 - Overview of Conventional Physics Regarding Spinning Tops, Gyroscopes, and Objects in Rotation
(11) @ 4:52:03 - Overview of Newton’s Laws and Einstein’s Relativity
(12) @ 5:28:39 - Owen Liang’s Gyro Space Top Proves Spin Angular Momentum is an Illusion
(13) @ 7:06:33 - INCEPTION IS REAL: Are We Living in a Dream?
(14) @ 7:07:36 - Exploring Owen Liang’s Many Unnecessary Accounts
(15) @ 9:00:10 - Owen Liang’s Battle with Wikipedia
(16) @ 9:19:47 - Francis McCabe and Gyro 1000X+ Torque Over Unity!

The following sections are shown in the second video.

(17) @ 0:00 - Inertial Propulsion and Inertial Lift are Facts of Life
(18) @ 52:58 - Tippy Tops and Phi Tops Demonstrate Rising with Spin Axis Change
(19) @ 1:54:32 - The Amazing and Underappreciated Gyrocompass
(20) @ 2:50:48 - The Concept of Inertia and Coherency
(21) @ 3:03:39 - Overview of Mainstream Clueless Science Regarding Gyroscopes and Objects in Rotation
(22) @ 3:45:51 - SUMMARY OF MY SELF-APPOINTED PHD
(23) @ 5:10:57 - MES DUALITY BREAKTHROUGH CONCEPT
(24) @ 5:53:35 - AREAS OF FURTHER RESEARCH
(25) @ 7:37:52 - Exploring the True Nature of Gravity, Mass, Magnetism, Electricity, Light, and Reality
(26) @ 7:48:05 - David LaPoint’s Primer Fields, the Ferrocell, and Ken Wheeler’s Magnetism
(27) @ 10:29:19 - THE TO KEY GYROSCOPIC MAGIC IS ‘COUNTERSPACE’
(28) @ 11:05:58- True Magnetism and the Interconnectedness of All Things

Stay tuned for #AntiGravity Part 7!


Watch Video On:

Download my PhD:

Full #AntiGravity Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


View PhD Below

View All Parts

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept
Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2
Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3
Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4
Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5
Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7


☝#ANTIGRAVITY PART 6: OBJECTS IN ROTATION DEFY 'MAINSTREAM' PHYSICS

My Self-Appointed PhD & The Cheat Code to Life: MES Duality

May 23, 2019

MATH EASY SOLUTIONS (MES)

https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


Self-Appointed PhD Thesis in the Physics of Reality

Mathiew Estepho

Bachelor of Applied Science in Civil Engineering at the University of British Columbia, 2011

Master of Applied Science in Mining Engineering at the University of British Columbia, 2014


Important Links, Notes, and Recap of Previous Video Parts

Reuse of My Videos and Documents

  • Feel free to make use of, re-upload, monetize my videos and/or documents as long as you provide a link to the original video and/or document.

Tips and Faster Playback Speed

As per usual in all my recent videos, take note of the following tips when viewing this or any other video, especially if you don’t have time to watch the whole video.

Recap on Previous Parts

The early parts of this video series are listed below, as well as my deep dive into the world of real info.

  • MUST WATCH: 10,000+ Subscribers Recap: My Dive into the Rabbit Hole and #FreeEnergy: https://mes.fm/milestones-playlist
  • Part 1: Introduction to Gyroscopes, Eric Laithwaite, and "Anti-Gravity" + Random Saturn Symbolism + My Rant Trashing Mainstream Science
  • Part 2: Eric Laithwaite Lifts a 40 lb Gyro-Wheel Like a Feather!
  • Part 3: Eric Laithwaite's Reality-Defying "Controversial" Gyro Lecture
  • Part 4: Spinning Wheels Precess with ZERO Angular Momentum, ZERO Centripetal Force, and near Instantaneous Reactionless acceleration.
  • Part 5: Spinning Wheels Balance UPSIDE DOWN!

Video Notes Download and Viewing Links

Download Link for this Document: (updated after completion of this video.)

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept
Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2
Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3
Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4
Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5
Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7

Full Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist
YouTube Playlist: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist
View or Download All Notes: https://mes.fm/antigravity

Relevant Video Series

Here are links to my other relevant video series.

These video series are all intertwined. #911Truth is the motivation to research #FreeEnergy which inevitably leads to #AntiGravity, and all of which require to rethink everything we think we know about science, life, and reality in general. And #MESExperiments is my effort in doing just that! Make sure to watch them all! The DRAFT #MESExperiments are the nearly 800 experiments (as of today) which I film in bulk whenever I am analyzing any physical phenomena; i.e. the MES certified real scientific method.


Introduction

The making of this video broke me. The write up of this document straightened me out. The discoveries made required a journey of self-reflection which led to the inevitable revealing of the face of the LORD.

The people I used to look up to now seem like a distant image in my rear view. Heroes such as Judy Wood and Eric Laithwaite have demonstrated their purpose in life, even if they had not yet fully realized it. What they did was do and say what must be said because it must be said. It must be said not because it is “important” since no thing is important on its own. It must be said because others are not saying it. It must be said because life itself has no meaning if it is not said. It must be said because no one else will say it. It must be said because, well just because, it is wanted to be said.

Is there anything more meaningful than saying what is wanted to be said?

I have appointed this research document and video as my “Doctor of Philosophy” or PhD in the “Physics of Reality”, because I want to.

Alright enough speaking in parables. This PhD documents many of my findings, as well as those of other free-thinking researchers and inventors, that are on the face of them so simple but the implications so grand. The greatest implication is how the entire world has been blind to the “mainstream” physics-defying properties of simple spinning tops and gyroscopes. Yes, simple rotating objects.

So simple, yet in every textbook and university in the world you will not find that they magically rise all on their own.

Simple experiments demonstrate “mass” transferring, disappearing, reappearing, and generating focused over-unity force. Simple experiments that require conventional terms of “conservation of energy”, “angular momentum”, and “momentum” to come with an asterisk (*): *pseudo-science.

Simple easy to replicate experiments demonstrate that something else is being interacted with. We have been consciously unaware of its presence, but subconsciously we have breathed it on Earth since the dawn of this theatre we call ‘reality’. Even in death we can’t escape its presence.

The Aether.

This video sets a precedent for true scientific exploration, one which lets reality do the talking instead of imposing unproven (and disproven) theory upon unproven (and disproven) theory. I will be referencing this document in all of my later works, so make sure to fully comprehend what is presented.

Hope you enjoy!

Mathiew Estepho
CEO and Founder of Math Easy Solutions (MES)


Table of Contents

  • IMPORTANT LINKS, NOTES, AND RECAP OF PREVIOUS VIDEO PARTS
  • INTRODUCTION
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • #MESEXPERIMENTS: MES SCIENCE EXPERIMENTS VIDEO SERIES
  • IMPORTANT NOTES ON PHYSICS AND SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION
  • MES DISCLAIMER ON “MAINSTREAM” ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING
  • AN “EXPLANATION” IS NOT THE ONLY POSSIBLE EXPLANATION, AND CERTAINLY NOT NECESSARILY A CAUSATION
  • MES AXIOM: ALL “EXPLANATIONS” ARE JUST APPROXIMATIONS TO EXACT NATURAL PHENOMENA
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF ENTERTAINING DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA
  • THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX
  • CLEARING ERIC LAITHWAITE’S NAME FROM SLANDER AND IGNORANCE
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE'S OBITUARY BY IMPERIAL COLLEGE IS "COINCIDENTALLY" MISSING SOMETHING…
  • THE “ROYAL” FAMILY’S PRINCE CHARLES WAS A BIG FAN OF ERIC’S GYROS!
  • Eric Laithwaite Lifting Heavy Gyros with his Pinky Finger!
  • Harvey Fiala’s Inertial Propulsion Device
  • VERITASIUM’S DISGRACEFUL AND BLATANT COVERUP OF ERIC LAITHWAITE’S IRREFUTABLE ANTI-GRAVITY WHEEL
  • Veritasium Literally Suggests that Eric Laithwaite is a Con-man Using a “Trick” to Purposely Mislead People
  • Gyroscopes Rise When the Precession is Hurried and Drops When it is Slowed
  • How Can the Center of Mass Rise Without Changing the Weight?!
  • MES POST FILMING REALIZATION: Veritasium Showed Clips of the Weight Changing
  • Conventional Physics Requires Weight Scale Reading to Change as Center of Mass Increases
  • MES BOMBSHELL REALIZATION: Simple Forced Precession Has Always Demonstrated Reactionless Inertial Propulsion!
  • Veritasium Suggests that Eric Laithwaite is Lying About the Gyro Wheel Feeling as Light as a Feather
  • The Gradual Evolution of My Awareness and Mindset
  • Veritasium Making a Mockery of Physics, Science, and Humanity
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: GYROSCOPES CAN RISE UPWARDS ALL ON THEIR OWN!
  • Mainstream Sources and Even Mainstream Alternative Sources Didn’t Think This Was Possible
  • Eric Laithwaite’s Missing 1966 First Ever Televised Christmas Lecture
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: GYROSCOPES CAN ALSO RISE “DOWNWARDS”!
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: REMOVING ROTATIONAL OR PRECESSIONAL FRICTION IS KEY TO MAGICAL GYRO-RISING
  • MAINSTREAM WIKIPEDIA OVERVIEW OF ERIC LAITHWAITE’S LIFE
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE ATTEMPTS TO EXPLAIN GYROSCOPIC INERTIAL PROPULSION IN TERMS OF UNCONVENTIONAL NEWTONIAN MECHANICS
  • “MASS TRANSFER” OR REACTIONLESS INERTIAL PROPULSION EXPERIMENT
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: GYROSCOPES CAN PRECESS UPWARDS ON ICE WITH ZERO CENTRIPETAL FORCE
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE’S MASS TRANSFER PAPER AND UNIVERSAL EQUATION FOR GYROSCOPES
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE DEMONSTRATES THAT FORCED PRECESSION CAN GENERATE LIFT!
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE’S INITIAL ANTI-GRAVITY WHEEL WEIGHED 50 POUNDS!
  • CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY’S BOGUS "REPETITION OF LAITHWAITE'S EXPERIMENTS, WITH EXPLANATIONS"
  • RECAP OF ERIC LAITHWAITE’S DEMONSTRATION OF A GYROSCOPE PRECESSING WITH ZERO CENTRIPETAL FORCE
  • 3000 Pound Gyro-Car Precessing About a 10 Pound Ladder?
  • EMMA WILSON’S ATTEMPT TO DEBUNK THE UNDEBUNKABLE: GYROSCOPES PRECESS WITH ZERO CENTRIPETAL FORCE
  • EMMA WILSON’S CARTOON FAKE PHYSICS
  • EMMA WILSON DOESN’T ADDRESS THE MANY FACTORS THAT AFFECT PRECESSION
  • MY ICE EXPERIMENTS VALIDATE ERIC LAITHWAITE AND DEBUNK EMMA WILSON
  • SHOUT OUT TO “WOOPYJUMP” AND “JOGGLEVISION” YOUTUBE CHANNELS FOR ALSO SEEING THROUGH BOGUS CAMBRIDGE FAKE SCIENCE!
  • FAMOUS PRECESSING BICYCLE WHEEL EXPERIMENT HAS ALWAYS DEMONSTRATED ZERO CENTRIPETAL/CENTRIFUGAL FORCE
  • GYROSCOPES PRECESS WITH ZERO “ANGULAR MOMENTUM”
  • THE DISCOVERY THAT PUT MY ENTIRE LIFE ON HOLD
  • TOP SECRET: SPINNING TOPS PROVE WE LIVE IN A DREAM #INCEPTION
  • WHY WAS A SPINNING TOP CHOSEN FOR THE INCEPTION MOVIE?
  • WHY DOESN'T A SPINNING TOP FALL?
  • LITERALLY EVERY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE ARTICLE EVER WRITTEN IGNORES, DOWNPLAYS, OR DOESN’T EXPLAIN THE FACT THAT SPINNING TOPS AND PRECESSING GYROSCOPES RISE UPWARDS
  • “ROTATIONAL INERTIA", OR INERTIA IN GENERAL, IS THE LEAST UNDERSTOOD AND MOST MISUNDERSTOOD TOPIC IN PHYSICS
  • BRUCE YEANY’S BRILLIANT ILLUSTRATIONS OF MAINSTREAM ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND SPINNING FORCES
  • CENTRIPETAL REAL FORCE VS. CENTRIFUGAL FICTIONAL FORCE COMPARISON
  • THE AMAZING SPILLNOT
  • “ANGULAR MOMENTUM” IS THE ROTATIONAL EQUIVALENT OF LINEAR MOMENTUM
  • NO MENTION ON WIKIPEDIA THAT GYROSCOPES MAGICALLY RISE UPWARDS!
  • BRIEF OVERVIEW OF NEWTON’S LAWS OF MOTION AND EINSTEIN’S THEORIES OF RELATIVITY
  • Newton’s 3 Laws of Motion
  • Newton's 1st Law
  • Newton's 2nd Law
  • Newton's 3rd Law
  • Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Coulomb’s Law of Electric Force
  • Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
  • Special Relativity
  • Mainstream “Luminiferous” Aether vs MES True Aether
  • General Relativity
  • Equivalence Principle
  • Equivalence Principle and Electromagnetism Paradox
  • Mainstream Attempt to Unify Relativity with Quantum Mechanics
  • MAINSTREAM WIKIPEDIA PHYSICS WAS LACKING SO I LOOKED FOR ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS
  • THE MYSTERIOUS AND BRILLIANT OWEN LIANG
  • Owen Liang Held the Top Secret Spinning Top Secret Since At Least 2008
  • Fast forward to Owen’s More Recent Videos and Websites
  • OWEN LIANG’S 4 CATEGORY OF SPINNING TOPS
  • Category 1: Gravity Spinning Top
  • Category 2: Inverting Spinning Top
  • Category 3: Asymmetrical Spinning Top
  • Category 4: Hybrid Spinning Tip
  • MES Category 5: Hybrid Asymmetrical Spinning Top
  • Gyro Space Top Can Jump Back and Forth from Different Categories
  • OWEN LIANG’S “GLOBE TOP” ALLUDES TO THE SECRET BEHIND UFO TECHNOLOGY
  • OWEN LIANG’S AMAZON GRYO SPACE TOP PRODUCT LISTING IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE!
  • Great Insights from Owen’s Product Listing
  • Owen Liang Owes Me Money!
  • LIANG DISTANCES HIMSELF FROM "ANGULAR MOMENTUM" AND SO DO I
  • Owen Liang Also Distances Himself from "Friction" and So Do I
  • OWEN LAING’S INVERSE LAW OR THEORY OF OPPOSITION
  • The Illusion of “Angular Momentum”
  • The Subtle Difference Between Spinning Tops and Typical Gyroscopes
  • The Profound Implications of Owen Liang’s Discovery: Gravity = Magnetism = Any Opposing Force?!
  • Rotation = Automatic Balancing!
  • OWEN LIANG EXPLAINS WHY THE GYRO SPACE TOP WAS INVENTED CENTURIES LATE
  • INCEPTION IS REAL
  • IS REALITY JUST A DREAM?
  • FURTHER EXPLORERING THE GENIUS MIND OF OWEN LIANG
  • SUMMARY OF OWEN LIANG’S MANY RANDOM WEBSITES AND ONLINE ACCOUNTS I COVERED EARLIER
  • NEW OWEN LIANG ONLINE ACCOUNTS I RECENTLY DISCOVERED!
  • Owen Liang's Kickstarter and the Man Behind the Legend
  • Owen Liang Has Written Two Top Secret E-Books!
  • Owen's New and Improved Website!
  • OWEN LIANG’S PATENT FINALLY GOT APPROVED!
  • Patent Application
  • Patent Granted
  • HIGHLIGHTS FROM HIS NEWLY DISCOVERED CHANNELS
  • Spinning Top Based Self-Balancing One-Wheeled Robot
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Spinning Tops Can Rise and Lift Much Greater Than Their Own Weight and at an Increased Rising Rate!
  • Bogus YouTube Comment Section “Critics” Not Thinking Clearly
  • Precessing Gyroscopes Rise Even When Hung on a String
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Replicating the Rising Gyro on String Experiment with a Counterweight Makes it Drop!
  • Bogus “Critic” Returns
  • Owen Liang Still Won’t Respond to Me About Purchasing a Billion Gyro Space Tops!
  • Automated Electric Gyro Space Top
  • HIGHLIGHTS FROM OWEN’S KICKSTARTER CAMPAIGNS
  • Highschool Teacher Baffled by the Anti-Gravity Space Top
  • Kickstarter “Critics” Repeating Typical Unthinking Appeal-to-Authority Talking Points
  • HIGHLIGHTS FROM HIS NEW GOOGLE SITE
  • Owen Liang References My #MESExperiments Part 1 Video of Rising Gyros!
  • Owen’s Updated Theory of Opposition and the Liang Force
  • More Highlights from his New Site
  • HIGHLIGHTS FROM HIS PATENT
  • HIGHLIGHTS FROM HIS TOP SECRET BOOKS
  • New Theoretical Top: Flying Tops
  • New Theoretical Top: Astroid Turning Top
  • Spiral Precession is True Precession, NOT Circular Precession
  • “Angular Momentum” Can’t Explain the Gyro Space Top
  • No Upwards Force Can Be Found to Explain How a Spinning Top Rises
  • Theoretical “Liang Forces” or Horizontal Centrifugal Forces that Create Upwards Torque
  • Owen Liang Mistakenly Assumes That Faster Spinning Speeds Equate to Faster Rising
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Faster Gyro Spin Speed Does Not Necessarily Mean Faster Rising
  • Gravity as a “Soft Anchor” and Theoretical Liang Axis
  • Multiple or Distributed Theoretical Liang Axis and Force
  • MES Gyroscope Experiments Appear to Contradict Owen’s Theoretical “Liang Forces”
  • Owen’s First Gyro Space Top Prototype
  • Inspirational and Heart Felt Top Secret Poem
  • OWEN LIANG’S BATTLE WITH WIKIPEDIA TO GET THE GYRO SPACE TOP PUBLISHED
  • WIKIPEDIA “ORPHAN” ARTICLES WITH NO LINKS FROM OTHER PAGES
  • OWEN LIANG’S COMMUNICATIONS WITH WIKIPEDIA FROM AUGUST 2015 TO JUNE 2016
  • Owen’s Orphan Articles Considered “Spam” and a “Hoax”
  • Wikipedia is Not a Place for Original or Non-Mainstream Research
  • Owen Liang Didn’t Help His Case…. LOL
  • Owen’s Further Communications with Oblivious Admins
  • PLEASE HELP BY POSTING ON WIKIPEDIA OR EMAILING MAINSTREAM OUTLETS ON MY BEHALF
  • FRANCIS MCCABE 1000X+ TORQUE OVER-UNITY LARGE GYRO WHEEL!
  • PRECESSION GIVES THE ILLUSION OF “ANGULAR MOMENTUM”
  • THE MAGICAL POTENTIAL OF GYRO OVER-UNITY POWER
  • Manually Powered Gyro Precession Over-Unity Power Generator?!
  • FRANCIS MCCABE’S 88X TORQUE OVER-UNITY OSCILLATING GYRO PISTON PROTOTYPE
  • Over Unity Gyro Piston Powered Car?
  • Over Unity Compact Gyro Piston Powered Bicycle?
  • Over Unity Giant Gyro Piston Power Plant?
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE DEMONSTRATED FORCED PRECESSION GYRO TORQUE OVER-UNITY IN 1974 LECTURE
  • MES BOMSHELL DISCOVERY: DOWNWARDS TORQUE INDUCES FORCED PRECESSION WHICH INDUCES RISING TORQUE?!
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Can Rise Upwards Faster When Weight is Added and Can Rise Even on a Needle
  • FRANCIS MCCABE DEMONSTRATES PRECESSION REQUIRES NO ADDITIONAL POWER INPUT EVEN AT TORQUE OVER-UNITY
  • Clueless “Critics” Need to Remove the Blindfold Covering Their Minds
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Exert “Inertial Forces” With Zero Loss in Spin Speed
  • WIKIPEDIA DELETES FRANCIS MCCABE’S WIKIPEDIA PAGE A FEW DAYS AGO…
  • Fortunately, I Archived His Wikipedia Page
  • INERTIAL PROPULSION AND INERTIAL LIFT ARE FACTS OF LIFE
  • IMPORTANCE OF GYROSCOPES FORCED PRECESSION CAUSING RISING OR DROPPING
  • MES EXPERIMENTS DEMONSTRATING INERTIAL PROPULSION AND INERTIAL LIFT
  • PRECESSION DIRECTION AND GYRO SPIN DIRECTION TEND TO LINE UP OPPOSITE OF VERTICAL FORCE
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE DEMONSTRATION GYRO INERTIAL LIFT THROUGH FORCED PRECESSION
  • MES BOMBSHELL REALIZTION: VERY LITTLE FORCED PRECESSION IS REQUIRED TO GENERATE LIFT
  • THE INERTIAL PROPULSION INVENTION BY ALEX JONES THAT THRUST ERIC LAITHWAITE INTO THE MAGICAL WORLD OF GYROSCOPES
  • THE FAMOUS SANDY KIDD INVENTION THAT GENERATES LIFT THROUGH FORCED PRECESSION
  • Important Note on Sandy Kidd’s Invention
  • YOUTUBE EXPERIMENTER “WOOPYJUMP" DEMONSTRATES HORIZONTAL INERTIAL PROPULSION
  • Disappearing Mass During Natural Precession and Reappearing During Forced Precession Causes “Action Without Reaction”?
  • HARVEY FIALA’S INERTIAL PROPULSION DEVICE
  • TIPPY TOP AND THE PHI TOP DEMONSTRATE GYRO MAGICAL RISING WHILE CHANGING SPIN AXIS
  • MAINSTREAM (BOGUS) REVIEW OF PHI TOPS AND TIPPY TOPS
  • PBS YouTube Channel “Physics Girl” Enters “Veritasium” and Cambridge University Level of Mockery of Physics
  • MES REAL SCIENCE LOW FRICTION ICE EXPERIMENTS
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Frozen Phi Top and Tippy Top Rise on Ice!
  • MES Semi-BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Phi Tops and Tippy Tops Have Difficulty Maintaining Risen Position After Rising
  • Tippy Top in Slow Motion Shows Amazing Spin Axis Change, Reverse Spinning, and Upwards Launch
  • MES Semi-BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Tippy Tops Require Adequate Friction to Maximize Spin Speed After Rising Upwards
  • MES BOMBSHELL REALIZATION: Spinning Tops Tend to Rise Faster Than Similar Precessing Gyroscopes Because Rolling Generates Forced Forward Precession!
  • MES BOMBSHELL POTENTIONAL DISCOVERY: Is a Non-Rolling Spinning Top Just a Gyroscope?
  • TIPPY TOP AND PHI TOP EXPERIMENTS WITH A MAGNETIC STIRRER
  • Frozen Tippy Top on Ice Drops its Stem at Low Spin Speeds on Magnetic Stirrer
  • Amazing Phi Top Rising Demonstration on Magnetic Stirrer!
  • “Physics Girl” Could’ve Saved Me Time by Just Using Wooden or Plastic Tops on Ice
  • THE GREAT OWEN LIANG ALSO SEES PAST THE BOGUS “FRICTION” EXCUSE FOR TIPPY TOPS AND PHI TOPS
  • THE GYROCOMPASS IS THE EMBODIMENT OF THE MAGICAL PROPERTIES OF GYROSCOPES
  • GYROSCOPE SPIN AND PRECESSION DIRECTION TEND TO ALIGN AND OPPOSITE OF VERTICAL FORCE
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes with a Tilted Stem Will Rise Until Spin and Precession Directions are Aligned
  • MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes with a Tilted Stem Hung by a String Can Rise from Negative Angles
  • Tippy Tops and Phi Tops Demonstrate Stable Spin and Precession Alignment at Higher Centers of Mass
  • THE AMAZING AND UNDERAPPRECIATED GYROCOMPASS
  • MES Gimbaled Gyroscope Demonstrates the Mechanism of a Gyrocompass
  • A Gyrocompass is Just a Gyroscope that is Forced to Precess with Earth’s Rotation
  • Super Precise and Durable Gyrocompasses are Used in Many Ships at Sea
  • FRANCIS MCCABE DEMONSTRATES FIRST EVER MECHANICAL DEMONSTRATION OF “INERTIA”
  • Balls Inside a Spinning Sphere Align with the Spin Direction
  • MES PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF “INERTIA” SHEDS LIGHT ON ITS MYSTERY
  • QUICK OVERVIEW OF MAINSTREAM “EXPLANATIONS” REGARDING GYROSCOPES AND OBJECTS IN ROTATION
  • BIG MAINSTREAM SCIENCE YOUTUBE CHANNELS CAN’T GET BASIC ROTATIONAL PHYSICS CORRECT
  • 14+ Million Subscribers “Vsauce” Doesn’t Know Gyroscopes Can Rise Upwards
  • 270+ Thousand Subscribers Steve Mould Doesn’t Know Gyroscopes Don’t Lose Spin Speed from Twisting
  • 455+ Thousand Subscribers “standupmaths” is Baffled by the Tippy Top
  • John Perry’s 1890 Book on Spinning Tops Understood Hurrying Precession is the Key to Rising of Spinning Tops
  • 199+ Thousand Subscribers Walter Lewin Cautions Students About the Most Difficult Concept of All: Gyroscopes and Torque
  • 5+ MILLION SUBSCRIBERS “VERITASIUM” CAN’T FIND A PHYSICIST THAT CAN EXPLAIN A SPINNING DISK
  • MAINSTREAM SCIENCE WEBSITES BAFFLED BY OBJECTS IN ROTATION
  • “American Scientist” Doesn’t Know how Gyroscopes Work or What Inertia Is
  • The Most Difficult Concept in Physics: Spinning Tops
  • HISTORICAL “SCIENTISTS” BAFFLED AT SIMPLE TOPS
  • BICYCLES ARE STILL A MYSTERY TO MAINSTREAM SCIENCE
  • SUMMARY OF MY SELF-APPOINTED PHD
  • OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND TOPICS COVERED
  • INTRODUCTION AND RELEVANT LINKS
  • IMPORTANT NOTES ON PHYSICS
  • CLEARING ERIC LAITHWAITE’S NAME FROM SLANDER AND IGNORANCE
  • REVIEW OF VERITASIUM’S DISGRACEFUL COVERUP OF ERIC LAITHWAITE’S ANTI-GRAVITY WHEEL
  • MAINSTREAM WIKIPEDIA NARRATIVE AND SLANDER OF ERIC LAITHWAITE
  • ERIC LAITHWAITE’S LATER “MASS TRANSFER” THEORY AND UNCONVENTIONAL INTERPRETATION OF NEWTONIAN MECHANICS
  • CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY INSULT TO SCIENCE AND BLATANT COVERUP OF ERIC’S REALITY DEFYING GYROSCOPE COMMON SENSE FINDINGS
  • MAINSTREAM WIKIPEDIA PHYSICS OF SPINNING TOPS AND GYROSCOPES
  • MAINSTREAM PHYSICS OF THE MYSTERY OF INERTIA
  • DEFINITION OF “INERTIA” IS BASIS FOR NEWTONIAN AND EINSTEINIAN PHYSICS
  • TOP SECRET: OWEN LIANG PROVES INCEPTION IS REAL
  • Further Information Regarding the Bizarrely Genius Owen Liang
  • Owen Liang’s Trouble Getting his Gyro Space Top Published on Wikipedia
  • FRANCIS MCCABE LARGE’S GYRO WHEEL DEMONSTRATES 1000X+ TORQUE OVER-UNITY AND THE ILLUSION OF “ANGULAR MOMENTUM”
  • INERTIAL PROPULSION AND INERTIAL LIFT ARE FACTS OF LIFE
  • TIPPY TOPS AND PHI TOPS ALSO MAGICALLY RISE BUT WHILE CHANGING SPIN AXIS
  • THE GYROCOMPASS EMBODIES MUCH OF THE MAGICAL PROPERTIES OF GYROSCOPES
  • OVERVIEW OF MAINSTREAM GYROSCOPIC PHYSICS
  • SUMMARY OF MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERIES AND REALIZATIONS
  • MES DUALITY BREAKTHROUGH CONCEPT
  • ELABORATION OF THIS REALIZATION
  • THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS CONCEPT
  • DISCOVERY OF #MESDUALITY
  • MES Duality is the Realization that the Apparent Duality in All Things is an Illusion
  • ALL IS ALL IN ALL AND THINKING OTHERWISE IS “SINFUL”
  • THE RIPPLE IN THE AETHER OF DUALITY
  • THE ALL SEEING AND ALL KNOWING I
  • AREAS OF FURTHER RESEARCH
  • THE REAL PHYSICS OF SPINNING OBJECTS REQUIRES RE-EXAMINING ALL OF SCIENCE
  • MULTIPLE SPINNING WHEELS, REVERSE SPINNING WHEELS, AND BICYCLES
  • Gyroscopic Stabilized Bike Wheel?!
  • Monowheel Lets You Ride Inside a Bike Wheel!
  • 1960s Gyro-X Prototype Car
  • Bicycles Can’t Balance When Steering is Locked?!
  • Bicycles Can Balance Even with a “Negative Caster Trail” or Counter Rotating Wheels to Cancel the “Gyroscopic Effect”
  • Bicycles (and Humans) Balance on a Treadmill Without Needing Forward “Momentum”
  • Eric Laithwaite’s “Most Remarkable” Gyroscope Experiment on a Pivot
  • Mainstream Science Can’t Get Curling Physics Right
  • MES INTERESTING DISCOVERY: Spinning Tops Can Precess in Reverse Direction and Likely Due to Rolling
  • MES INTERESTING DISCOVERY: Tippy Tops Rolling in Opposite Direction of Precession but Can Precess in Normal Direction Once Flipped
  • GYROSCOPIC EFFECTS WITHOUT CIRCULAR MOTION
  • Vibrating Gyroscopes in Electronics and Nature
  • Vibrating Inverted Pendulum Stabilizes Upside Down!
  • John Hartman’s Square Gyro
  • TADASHI TOKIEDA’S TOYS AND CHIRALITY
  • Rattlebacks Rattle Backwards and Forwards
  • First Ever Chiral Tippy Top?
  • “Physicists” Deny it Existence LOL
  • MES Possible Mechanism for Tippy Top Chirality
  • Mechanical Demonstration of Phase Transition
  • Euler’s Disk: Interaction Between Spinning, Rolling, Vibration, and Sound
  • Mainstream “Open Problem” of Magnetic Colliding “Abacus”
  • TIM ROWETT’S GRAND ILLUSIONS AND GRAND TOY COLLECTION
  • The Hooey Stick or (Whammy Diddle) Generates Rotation from Vibration
  • Amazing Magnetic Carousal Top
  • INTERMEDIATE AXIS THEOREM (OR TENNIS RACKET THEOREM)
  • MICRO-GRAVITY SPACE STATION FLUID FILLED SPINNING AND SYMPHONY OF SPHERES
  • Medium Thickness Fluid Filled Bottles Are Unstable When Spun on Small Axis
  • Thin Fluid Filled Bottles are Stable When Spun on Small Axis
  • Symphony of Spheres: Water Bubbles Inside Air Bubble Inside Water Bubble
  • THE MAGNUS EFFECT, COANDA EFFECT, AND LIFT
  • The Magnus Effect (and Long Exposure Photography)
  • The Coanda Effect
  • Schlieren Optics: Photography and Videography by Detecting Light Refraction
  • The Mainstream Science of Lift is Still Largely a Mystery
  • VIKTOR SCHAUBERGER, VORTICES IN NATURE, THE WEISSENBERG EFFECT
  • Stirring Water Creates a Vortex that Pushes Water Outwards and Inwards
  • Connected Vortices that Travel Forward Together in Water?!
  • Weissenberg Effect: Some Liquids Spiral Upwards When Stirred
  • ANTI-GRAVITY SLINKYS, BEADS, AND LIQUIDS
  • Toy Slinkys Levitate During Compression
  • Chain of Beads Falls by First Rising Upwards
  • Kaye Effect
  • CONTACTLESS ROTATION VIA THE EGELY WHEEL (OR PSI WHEEL)
  • PENDULUM INERTIAL PROPULSION
  • MAGNETS IN ROTATION, FREE ENERGY, AND THE LATE GREAT BRUCE DEPALMA
  • Drop Tests for Objects in Rotation and/or Magnetic Repulsion
  • Bruce DePalma’s Spinning Ball Drop Test Claims a Spinning Ball Moves Faster
  • Boyd Bushman’s Conjoined Magnets in Repulsion Drop Test Claims to Drop Slower
  • Dropping a Magnet Tends to Align itself with Earth’s Magnetic Field in Mid-Flight??
  • Rotating Alternating Magnetic Polarity Generates Rotation and Heat in Metal
  • Smashing Metal Spheres Generates Loud Sound and Heat
  • TRUE ANTI-GRAVITY DEMONSTRATIONS AND INVENTIONS
  • John Hutchison’s Electromagnetic Levitation and Transmutation of Many Types of Materials
  • Hurricanes and Tornados Use More Than Just “Wind” to Lift Heavy Trucks and Trailers
  • Russian Inventor Demonstrates High Voltage and Rotation Can Generate Anti-Gravity Lift?
  • Sound Levitation, Cymatics, and Amazing Field Geometry
  • Tesla Coil Can Generate Loud Sound and Even Modulated to Play Music?!
  • WHAT EXACTLY IS GRAVITY, MASS, MAGNETISM, ELECTRICITY, LIGHT, NATURE, OR REALITY?
  • Exploring the Concept of “Center of Mass”
  • Eric Laithwaite’s Table of Scientific Analogy
  • Fourth Law of Motion: Intractance?
  • John Duffield’s Theory of Everything and My Impetus to Study Gyroscopes
  • David LaPoint’s Game Changing Primer Fields
  • Bowl Shaped Magnetic Fields vs Typical Bar Magnet Model
  • Magnetic Bowls have a Flip Point and Ability to Eject Matter
  • Magnetic Bowls Can Repel Non-Magnetized Steel Balls
  • Fundamental Primer Field Model of a Photon and All Matter
  • Primer Field Magnetic Bowls Can Contain Rotating Plasma Ball of Energy and Create Energy Ejections
  • Primer Field Electromagnetic Model Can Replace Unnecessary “Black Holes, Dark Energy, & Dark Matter”
  • Saturn’s Hexagon is No Longer a Mystery!
  • Primer Fields View of Light
  • Primer Fields View of Constructive vs. Destructive Field Interference
  • Primer Fields View of Double Slit Experiment and “Particle-Wave Duality”
  • Primer Fields View of the Atomic and the Galactic
  • Walter Russell and His “Inverse Primer Field” Experiment
  • Hexagons Appear Everywhere!
  • WHAT IS THE TRUE MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL?
  • Permanent Magnets are Formed by Electrocuting Metal
  • Typical Mainstream Magnetic Field Model
  • Iron Filings Become Bar Magnets Themselves and In a Fixed Position Upon a Magnetic Field
  • Recap of David LaPoint’s Primer Field Bowl Shaped Magnetic Field Model
  • The Ferrocell Exhibits a Different Magnetic Field
  • Inventor of the Ferrocell Tim Vanderelli and Ferrocell USA
  • Comparison of a Ferrocell Field vs. Typical Iron Filings
  • Moving Nano-Particles in Ferrocell Showcase Path of “Magnetic Field”?
  • Magnets in Repulsion Under a Ferrocell Exhibit an Extra “Black Hole” or “Sink”
  • Magnets in Attraction Under a Ferrocell Demonstrate Field Lines Repelling
  • The Top View of Magnets Are Very Similar for Different Shapes Under a Ferrocell Even for the Center Empty Space of Ring Magnets!
  • Proper Magnetic Setup Can Exhibit Rotational Light Effects When Lasers are Directed to a Ferrocell
  • Brian Kerr’s Amazing BitChute Channel Demonstrating the Ferrocell
  • Purchase or Create Your Own Ferrocell!
  • Make Your Own Ferrocell with a Drop of Blood?!
  • Ken Wheeler’s True Magnetism Theory
  • MES Criticism of Ken Wheeler’s Incoherent Rants Both in his Videos and his Book on Magnetism
  • MES Quick Summary of Ken Wheeler’s Theory of Magnetism
  • Dielectricity: The Fundamental Counterspatial Field Modality
  • MES BOMBSHELL REALIZATION: Counterspace is Located in the Same Place as Thoughts and Abstractions
  • The Torus Ring Slinky Analogy of the Aether and 4 Main Aetheric Fields: Dielectricity, Magnetism, Electricity, and Gravity
  • One Counterspace and Infinite Space
  • Bismuth, Hypercube, and “Anti-Cube” as Examples of the Dielectric Counterspace
  • Nature’s Two Principles of Operation: Force and Motion & Inertia and Acceleration
  • Ken’s Genuine Model of a Permanent Magnet
  • Experiments with Magnets, Ferrocell, CRT Tube, and Even Gyroscopes Validate Ken’s Magnetism
  • Comparison Between Magnetic Models
  • The Sport of Basketball Matches with Ken’s Magnetism #MESDuality
  • Highlights from Ken Wheeler’s Magnetism
  • Water Drop Analogy of “Wave-Particle Duality” of Light
  • All Magnets Line Up with a “Gyromagnetic Precession” Angle of 21.246 Degrees?!
  • Black Holes are Giant Magnetic Poles
  • Charles Steinmetz Century Old Model of Electricity as Made Up of Magnetism and Dielectricity
  • Iron Filings Field Geometry Line Up with Steinmetz Dielectric Conjugate of Electricity
  • Wood Patterns Appear to Also Show Magneto Dielectric Field Lines?!
  • Large Magnet Can Attract “Like Pole” of Smaller Magnet at Centripetal Magnetic Vortex
  • “Like Poles” Can Attract If One Steel Barrier is Placed Between but Not Two
  • Golden Ratio Field Pressure Mediation, Magnetic Polarity Phase Shift, and Magnetic Exposure Seed Growth
  • Magnet Covered with Ferrofluid Glides on Glass Frictionlessly: Is Friction Magnetic?
  • Simple Moiré Patterns Demonstrate Amazing Magnetic Field Interference Patterns
  • Conservation of the Ether (or Aether) to Replace “Conservation of Energy”
  • Mini Gyroscopes Analogy of Magnetism and “Field Incommensurability”
  • Gyroscopic Coherency and Applied Counter Spin Causes “Force Cancellation”?
  • THE KEY TO GYROSCOPIC MAGIC IS COUNTERSPACE!
  • MAGNETISM AND SIMILAR FIELD GEOMETRY APPEARING IN ALL OF NATURE

#MESExperiments: MES Science Experiments Video Series

Earlier this year, and right in the middle of making this very video, I felt the need to upload my science experiments separately as a series of their own. The purpose of these experiments is to provide simple stand-alone experiments that demonstrate physical phenomena in as clear and irrefutable terms as possible; and without any theories. Thus, as Dr. Judy Wood would say:

“Let the evidence speak for itself.”

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLai3U8-WIK0HUHoank-Lj9q6RGAS51QRh

Date >Retrieved: 1 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/xvnUa
Short URL: https://mes.fm/experiments-playlist
Links to All Video and Documents: https://steemit.com/mesexperiments/@mes/list

DRAFT #MESExperiments Unlisted Video Series

In conjunction with my above #MESExperiments, I have also just uploaded hundreds of draft experiments which I have filmed and reviewed in order to get a hands-on feel for many physical phenomena. I have tested many gyro-related objects in many different conditions to rule out or validate any particular theory I have in mind. Although there are hundreds of videos, sifting through them may obtain some hidden gems!

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLai3U8-WIK0FfZ_7hUuyO7xN8lp5oaDiu

Retrieved: 10 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/xubaF
Short URL: https://mes.fm/experiments-draft

Important Notes on Physics and Scientific Exploration

It is important to always have an open mind to new ideas, both from mainstream and alternative sources, but ultimately it is important to have a logically thinking mind. Here are some notes to help.

MES Disclaimer on “Mainstream” Anything and Everything

As always, whenever I cover random topics or make references from "mainstream" sources such as the (Orwellian) Wikipedia, I do so to build (mainstream) context and also for finding different avenues to dig further into. Thus, if you find any references questionable, please let me know as I could always use further video material!

An “Explanation” is Not the Only Possible Explanation, and Certainly Not Necessarily a Causation

An “explanation” depends on the language used, the assumption of the validity of concepts used, and the assumption that the combination of the language and concepts are correct. For example, pushing an object forward causes it to move forward because a “force” is exerted in a forward direction. This simple “explanation” of an object moving forward when pushed depends on the terminology of “force”, “object”, “forward”, etc.; the concept and definition of “force” itself; and the assumption that applying a force will always yield a motion in the direction of it. What about different types of objects, directions, materials, interactions, or even definitions of force, motion, objects, etc.? What about other equivalent “explanations”, entirely different terminology, or even contradictory “explanations”?

For example, does a ball being dropped in a vacuum drop at the same rate or does it differ under different conditions?

Does a spinning ball drop faster than a non-spinning ball? Bruce DePalma claims it does.

Do two magnets attached together in opposing polarity fall slower? Boyd Bushman claims it does.

Do two magnets in opposing polarity but spinning fall upwards? MES thinks it’s worth trying!

What about different materials, elevations, drop speeds, electromagnetic setups, etc.?

Thus, any and all “explanations” should be viewed as attempts at grasping the actual causation or mechanism for any phenomena. Viewing otherwise, especially in regard to mainstream explanations from authority figures, is akin to religious faith in doctrines doctors or professors profess during seminars or seminaries.

MES AXIOM: All “Explanations” are Just Approximations to Exact Natural Phenomena

This axiom, or self-evident truth, is a statement which I view as inherently valid. All explanations are merely approximations to nature. The better the explanation, the more accurate it is. Note that all scenarios need to be accounted for to avoid being locally accurate but globally inaccurate, as shown in the figure below.

Explanation 1 is very accurate initially, but inaccurate globally.
Explanation 2 is very accurate in the last phase, but inaccurate globally.
Explanation 3 is globally accurate, but locally not as accurate as Explanations 1 and 2.

Thus, even globally very accurate explanations or theories, can still be relatively inaccurate locally. Fine-tuned or revamping the theory is required.

Note that even the experimental data collection of the natural phenomena needs to be accurate, and fully tested. Otherwise, perfectly valid theories and explanations can be made, but for non-existent phenomena.

The Importance of Entertaining Different Interpretations of Physical Phenomena

When describing physical phenomena, it is always important to first think for yourself as to the behavior of an experiment, then consult with as many different interpretations as you can.

For example, a simple ball that is dropped from a height will always bounce less than its initial height until it is stationary at the bottom. The mainstream "Conservation of Energy" assumption states that the total potential energy is transformed to kinetic energy, and vice versa, but due to "friction" and "air resistance" the ball always reaches a shorter height than its previous.

But another way to look at this is that manually lifting the ball to its initial maximum height requires less energy than the combined energy required to manually lift the ball to the later shorter heights. Is this then #FreeEnergy?

Now this is some epic outside-the-box thinking!

Think Outside the Box

Is a matchstick burning itself to create the flame? Or, as Bruce DePlama viewed, is the matchstick acting as an antenna receiver releasing energy from the surrounding aetheric energy underlying all of life; like a phone interacting with a Wi-Fi internet field?

Clearing Eric Laithwaite’s Name from Slander and Ignorance

When Eric Laithwaite first stated that a gyroscope precesses with no centripetal, centrifugal, or angular momentum, that was enough for me. This was equivalent to coming across the front cover of Dr. Judy Wood’s book “Where Did the Towers Go?”. In both cases, I knew instantly that an adventure would ensue for me because what they demonstrated was the impossible.

The impossible became possible.

Both cases, I realized that I knew and could easily prove that they were right, and hence the entirety of the world was wrong. But in the case of Eric Laithwaite, although he was ridiculed and smeared by “Royal” fake science institutions such as the “Royal Society”, it became apparent that even Eric tried to stray away from his initial enthusiastic discoveries that Newton needed correction; and yes, Newton needs correction indeed.

In this section, I go over the mainstream narrative of Eric Laithwaite’s “controversial” life and clear up much of the slander, lies, and ignorance that is thrown at him.

Eric Laithwaite's Obituary by Imperial College is "Coincidentally" Missing Something…

For over 50 years Eric Laithwaite was obsessed with gyroscopes and for 20 of those years he was a professor at Imperial College. Yet in one of the most pathetic displays of history re-writing, Imperial College does not even include the word “gyroscopes” in his obituary, or post-death article regarding his life.

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/publications/reporterarchive/0055/feat03.htm

Retrieved: 25 March 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/CmYb6

You literally can't make this up!

The “Royal” Family’s Prince Charles was a Big Fan of Eric’s Gyros!

In a 1980 interview, Eric mentions how even the “Royal” family’s Prince Charles was interested in Eric’s gyroscopes, and in particular handling the 50-lb gyro wheel himself.

https://youtu.be/4-rQUS3ghkA?t=18m8s

Retrieved: 26 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/VwwK3

Eric even mentions that he could almost lift the gyro wheel with just one finger?!

A rowing boat with oars that don’t touch the water; paddling on the waters of the aether.

Also, interesting to see Eric’s mindset in updating the “laws” of motion.

So, Prince Charles snuck into Eric's lab to play with his Gyroscopes and 50 pound spinning wheel, but Imperial College won't mention the word "gyro" in his obituary.

Eric Laithwaite Lifting Heavy Gyros with his Pinky Finger!

Eric has showcased lifting a 40 lb and 50 lb large gyro wheel as if it was as light as a feather, and then even made the remark that he could almost lift it with one finger. And it just so happens that I have found a photo of him doing just that, although with a smaller gyro wheel, and he is lifting it with just his pinky finger!

http://swissenschaft.ch/tesla/content/T_Library/L_Theory/Gravity/AntiGravity%20and%20Gravity%201.pdf

Retrieved: 21 April 2019
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20190422001349/http://swissenschaft.ch/tesla/content/T_Library/L_Theory/Gravity/AntiGravity%20and%20Gravity%201.pdf
Local PDF Download Link: https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIh78ZJTLz1k-ae0b9ag

Gravity and Antigravity (Part 1 of 2) by David Pratt

(Page 19)


Fig. 2.7 One of Eric Laithwaite’s gyroscope demonstrations. The top is spinning at 2000 revolutions per minute and is rising quite rapidly up a helical path.3

I couldn’t find the exact figure for the weight of this gyro wheel, but I believe it is similar or the same as the one he used in his 1974 lecture so it should weigh about 24 pounds (or 10.88 kg) including the shaft. Eric Laithwaite is an absolute magician!

Harvey Fiala’s Inertial Propulsion Device

Furthermore, a patent on an inertial propulsion device by the Harvey Fiala and family mentions that Eric Laithwaite lifted a 40 lb wheel over his head with his little finger?!

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090183951A1/en

Retrieved: 8 May 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/e4FV4
PDF Download Link: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/14/48/67/bdf0c935f646c1/US20090183951A1.pdf

Inertial Propulsion Device Patent by Harvey, John, and John-Arthur Fiala

Page 17 (PDF Page 64)

Consider the demonstration that Dr. Eric Laithwaite once gave. At the end of a three foot rod he raised a 40 lb rotor over his head with the little finger on his right hand. How was this done? The answer is by applying a small horizontal torque to its axis. During the time that the torque was applied the weight essentially disappeared and all the weight Dr. Laithwaite had to lift with his little finger was the rod that weighed about 3 lbs. If the rod itself were spinning (and precessing with the rotor) with only the hand-grip not spinning, then Dr. Laithwaite would have had to lift only the weight of the hand-grip, which would be only a few ounces. Suppose the forcing torque could be sustained such that the weight remained at essentially zero, then it would take only a small rocket to lift the 3 lb rod with its 40 lb spinning rotor attached to it. This would still require a small “brute force” rocket, but the weight needing to be lifted is reduced by a factor of more than ten. Of course it would require an additional mechanism to implement the application of a continuous torque on such a rotor.

Note that Harvey Fiala is a retired rocket scientist and also worked for NASA; yet like many other scientists, he realized the world of gyroscopes was being overlooked. Here is a great documentary of his life as well as the inertial propulsion device from his patent.

https://youtu.be/sy8znYK8EXg

Retrieved: 8 May 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/nTFce

Note the mechanics in the above inertial propulsion system, which are very real and which I will cover further in this video. Hindering precession by the raised curved platform as the gyroscope precesses about it while an extra wheel is clipped onto the gyroscope and rolls on the platform causes the gyroscope to magically move forward; essentially utilizing the ability of a gyroscope to magically disappear “mass” in precession and reappear without reaction when precession is hindered.

Veritasium’s Disgraceful and Blatant Coverup of Eric Laithwaite’s Irrefutable Anti-Gravity Wheel

This video was what catapulted me into the gyroscope research field. How can such a huge YouTube channel give such a bogus misrepresentation of gyroscopes’ irrefutable anti-gravity properties?

https://youtu.be/tLMpdBjA2SU

Retrieved: 23 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/EpjmP

Is this a sick joke?! This is as clear as the coverup gets. Veritasium literally cuts out the part in which Eric Laithwaite could barely lift a non-spinning wheel with two hands directly above the center of mass! Why is Veritasium discussing this bogus irrelevant "harder to lift when torqued" nonsense?

Veritasium Literally Suggests that Eric Laithwaite is a Con-man Using a “Trick” to Purposely Mislead People

Veritasium literally is claiming Eric Laithwaite performed a “trick” in magically lifting the heavy gyro wheel over his head… This makes me sick…

Veritasium is actually suggesting that Eric Laithwaite spent his entire life obsessed with gyroscopes and at the ridicule and detriment of his career all because of a “trick”? A trick to do what?!

Gyroscopes Rise When the Precession is Hurried and Drops When it is Slowed

The only accurate thing covered by Veritasium is the (magical) property of gyroscopes rising when precession is forced and dropping when it is hindered or stopped. But even this property is casually downplayed without any explanation, while making bogus statements that the “weight doesn’t change” when a gyroscope rises.

Am I the only the person that finds this amazing?!

How Can the Center of Mass Rise Without Changing the Weight?!

During the making of this video, I had a realization that even Veritasium’s statement that forced precession makes the gyroscope rise but “without losing weight” is highly flawed and entirely misleading.

Think about what he is saying here. What does the gyroscope itself rising have to do weight? In (mainstream) physics, if the weight of the gyroscope were to increase, there must be a “force” exerted upwards to lift it up.

Firstly, it is not clear where the center of mass in Veritasium’s gimbal set up is, but it is the same as the gimbled gyroscope setup I think it should be somewhere as shown below.

The center of mass is close to the fulcrum thus it is not rising as fast as it would be without the counterweight. An increase in the center of mass should be associated with measured weight changes and depends on the precision of the weigh scale and rate of rising. The weigh scale used by Veritasium is not even precise enough to detect imbalance in the horizontal force applied, which explains why no weight change was measured; i.e. Veritasium is literally tipping the scales in favor of misleading bogus fake science.

As for Veritasium’s large gyro wheel weight measurements, the weight fluctuations were too large to gather any coherent understanding of what is going on.

Why can’t he just use a similar controlled small gyroscope set up and at various forced precession speeds using a precise weigh scale to actually understand what is happening?! Is real science too much to ask for a 5+ million subscribers (fake) science YouTube channel?

If he is arguing that the weight doesn’t change, then how is the center of mass rising without any change to the weight measurements?! Has the world gone mad?!

MES POST FILMING REALIZATION: Veritasium Showed Clips of the Weight Changing

After I was done recording #AntiGravity Part 6, I started reviewing over the video and then realized that in Veritasium’s video, there were two segments that showed weight changed due to forced precession of the gyroscope.

The following clip shows the weight change from 431.9 g to 431.0 g.

image.png

And this clip shows the weight change from 431.9 g to 442.2 g, presumably the bigger weight increase from the gyro losing spin speed.

image.png

Now which is it? Does the weight change or not? Why is Veritasium rushing to provide bogus cherry-picked statements with no context regarding spin speed, location of center of mass, amount of applied load, etc.? Also, interesting, why do they speak over and cut out the part where Eric Laithwaite state the gyro demonstrates zero centrifugal force? Why are using a gimbal setup that restricts the gyro setup from moving vertical upwards at the fulcrum?

What are these clowns hiding?

Conventional Physics Requires Weight Scale Reading to Change as Center of Mass Increases

Consider the weight scale reading of jumping.

Jumping off the ground requires exerting a force on the ground that is greater than the weight of the person, thus jumping is due to the reaction of applied force from pushing off by straightening knees and feet, etc. Thus, in the process of applying the force to the ground, the weight scale reading will increase. Then as lift is being generated the weight reading will decrease with upwards motion until reading zero when air born.

NBA players such as Zach Lavine and LeBron James can have a jump force of over 1000 pounds!

https://youtu.be/KlkqvVJKIIQ

Retrieved: 22 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/nVT2R

This is an example of “action has equal reaction”. The jump force is so high that it allows NBA players to jump ridiculously high!

This is more clearly demonstrated by a simple balancing toy rocking back and forth.

https://youtu.be/xk_wlOEejWg

Retrieved: 22 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/vOdNk

The weight fluctuates by about 5 grams and ultimately stabilizes at 63.36 g once the center of mass is stationary.

The balancing toy man rocks back and forth because the center of mass is actually below the feet and whenever it swings, it rises higher and thus wants to move back down to the lower center of mass position; essentially like a pendulum or swing.

A weight scale reading should measure the highest weight as the swingers swing downwards at the lowest center of mass and have the lowest weight reading as they swing higher upwards. In this case it is the mass or “inertia” of the swingers themselves causing upwards movement thus countering their own weight.

MES BOMBSHELL REALIZATION: Simple Forced Precession Has Always Demonstrated Reactionless Inertial Propulsion!

As will be shown later throughout this video, forced precession can indeed generate lift, and hence a weigh scale would measure less weight as it rises upwards off the ground. Whether lift is generated, or the gyro “just” magically rises as in the demonstration by the clueless clowns at Veritasium, forced precession by a horizonal force is generating vertical upwards rising motion, but without an expected increase in weight as would be expected from simply standing up quickly on a weigh scale. “Lift” is analogous to jumping off the ground, and “magically rising” is analogous to simply standing up from a crouched position; but unlike their counterparts, in both cases the gyroscope is rising upwards without any reaction to any downwards weigh-scale-reading-increasing force.

Reactionless propulsion has always been demonstrated right in front of our very eyes.

What good are eyes if the mind can’t comprehend?

Veritasium Suggests that Eric Laithwaite is Lying About the Gyro Wheel Feeling as Light as a Feather

Veritasium is taking his slander of Eric Laithwaite further by alluding that Eric was exaggerating / misleading / lying when he said it felt as light as a feather…

As Eric mentioned earlier that he can lift the gyro wheel almost with one finger, and given Veritasium’s horrible "explanation" video, frankly I believe Veritasium is straight up lying to our faces.

The Gradual Evolution of My Awareness and Mindset

Also, as I mentioned earlier in this video, the making of this video involved a gradual evolution of my mindset, knowledge, and awareness, which is none-more evident that in my earlier scorching comments towards Veritasium.

These were some scorching comments, but my mindset has shifted in trying to explain how “scientists” could push such bogus coverup of gyro magic, either intentionally or not; although I am confident this particular video was as clear as a coverup as it gets.

Now regardless of such a blatant coverup by Veritasium, the question that rises is:

*Why don’t people see through this bogus non-explanation?! *

Literally “anti-gravity” is demonstrated right before our very eyes, even if some “authority” figure says otherwise. I don’t care what anyone’s definition of “anti-gravity” is, lifting a spinning gyro like a feather passes my definition.

Veritasium Making a Mockery of Physics, Science, and Humanity

Veritasium “coincidentally” left out the part of Eric Laithwaite’s 40 pound wheel demonstration that showed he couldn’t lift the wheel vertically with two hands, as opposed to Veritasium holding the wheel sideways for some bizarre reason. Note also that Veritasium cuts out the part where Eric states the gyro wheel is displaying zero centrifugal force as it is not pulling his arm outwards; which further alludes to this being a blatant coverup job by Veritasium.

https://youtu.be/VUh6QXe4mMY

Retrieved: 23 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/HWJNN

Can you see the coverup? Do I need to state any further?

Disgraceful.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Can Rise Upwards All on Their Own!

Veritasium accused of Eric Laithwaite of “pushing” the gyroscope which makes it magically rise upwards whereas without this magical “push”, Eric couldn’t lift the same but non-spinning gyro with two hands. But even without this non-existent “trick”, gyroscopes can rise upwards, even at extremely steep angles.

https://youtu.be/I87jgq4-WB4

Retrieved: 23 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/uI2dJ

Are you seeing what I am seeing?! The gyroscope is magically rising. Literal sorcery right before our eyes.

Mainstream Sources and Even Mainstream Alternative Sources Didn’t Think This Was Possible

This discovery was entirely accidental! I had no reason to even consider gyroscopes magically rising because there was virtually no source online that even made mention of this. From Wikipedia and every University in the entire world, to even the great Eric Laithwaite, this simple property of gyroscopes was hidden in plain sight.

Imagine if Eric Laithwaite demonstrated just this experiment during his Christmas lectures. How would the world have been changed?

A giant gyro wheel that lifts itself?! Now that is some real science!

MES Note: This photo appears eerily made for this exact photoshop…

Eric Laithwaite’s Missing 1966 First Ever Televised Christmas Lecture

Interestingly, the above image is actually from Eric Laithwaite’s 1966 Christmas Lecture, which just so happens to be the first ever televised episode. It is also part of 31 episodes that are now missing.

https://www.rigb.org/christmas-lectures/missing-lectures

Retrieved: 10 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/oxckT

We are in the process of making the entire BBC archive of these broadcasts available on our website for the first time. However 31 episodes broadcast between 1966 and 1973 are missing. Included in the missing episodes is footage of Sir David Attenborough not seen since it was first broadcast live nearly 50 years ago.

The CHRISTMAS LECTURES have been delivered every year since 1825, making them the longest running series of scientific lectures in the world. They were the first science programme broadcast on the BBC, in 1936, and having featured on TV every year since 1966 they are also the second-longest running continuously broadcast science TV show. The CHRISTMAS LECTURES aim has always been to present an accessible and entertaining way to engage with science.

The 31 missing CHRISTMAS LECTURES are made up of 5 complete series of 6 lectures each, plus a single episode of Sir David Attenborough’s much loved 1973 series on ‘The language of animals’:

1966 – Engineer in wonderland – Eric Laithwaite
1967 – The intelligent eye – Richard Gregory
1969 – Time machines – George Porter
1970 – Monkeys without tails: a giraffe’s eye view of man – John Napier
1971 – Sounds of music: The science of tones and tunes – Charles Taylor
1973 – The language of animals (1 episode) – Sir David Attenborough

How can I help?

You can help our missing lectures campaign in several ways:

  • Have a search through your attics, basements, and rarely used cupboards to see if you have a recorded copy of any of the missing lectures
  • Ask your older relatives if they might have copies
  • Spead the word about the campaign on social media using #missingxmaslectures

And if you find a missing lecture or any other related material? Get in touch with us at [email protected] or call us on 0207 409 2992.

If you can find any of these episodes, please contact me as well at [email protected]

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Can Also Rise “Downwards”!

My first major discovery was that gyroscopes rise magically upwards. But much later on and in the making of this very document, I came across another discovery that literally flipped even my own already flipped view of gyroscopes. The above experiment showed that gyroscopes rise upwards when they should instead fall, but the following experiment does the opposite and drops when it should rise.

https://youtu.be/V8fEyoxfykk

Retrieved: 10 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/GEJlF

Note that the counterweight setup is such that the gyroscope hung by a string should remain level horizontally, but instead it magically drops as it (also magically) precesses.

What in the world is happening here!? Adding a counterweight or counter-torque to act against gravity has a reverse effect on gyros; in other words, welcome to the wonderful upside-down world of gyroscopes!

Gyroscopes have the ability to appear lighter… and heavier!

Note that the gyroscope with counterweight precesses in reverse direction relative to precession without the counterweight. But in both cases, the gyro appears to want to align spin and precession directions. This is essentially like a “gyro-compass”, which I will cover later in this video.

Mainstream Wikipedia Overview of Eric Laithwaite’s Life

Here is a quick overview of the caricature of Eric Laithwaite’s life by the oblivious editors at Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Laithwaite

Retrieved: 26 March 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/e7Rjq

Eric Laithwaite

Eric Roberts Laithwaite (14 June 1921 – 27 November 1997) was an English electrical engineer, known as the "Father of Maglev" for his development of the linear induction motor and maglev rail system.

MES Note: Maglev is derived from “Magnetic Levitation”.

He also worked at applying linear motors on the Tracked Hovercraft until its cancellation. In the 1980s, he was involved in creating a device to extract energy from sea waves (see patent GB2062114);[2] although the technology was successful in trials, it could not be made storm proof, hence it never became a commercial success.

Laithwaite was an able communicator who made many television appearances. Memorable among these were his Royal Institution Christmas Lectures to young people in 1966 and 1974. The latter of these made much of the surprising phenomena of gyroscopes.

In 1974, Laithwaite was invited by the Royal Institution to give a talk on a subject of his own choosing. He decided to lecture about gyroscopes, a subject in which he had only recently become interested. His interest had been aroused by an amateur inventor named Alex Jones, who contacted Laithwaite about a reactionless propulsion drive he (Jones) had invented.

MES Note: The name “Alex Jones” just has to pop up… LOL

Also note the disgraceful downplaying and unreferenced assumption of his experience with gyroscopes; and even to insinuating that Alex Jones is merely an “amateur”.

After seeing a demonstration of Jones's small prototype (a small wagon with a swinging pendulum which advanced intermittently along a table top), Laithwaite became convinced that "he had seen something impossible". In his lecture before the Royal Institution he claimed that gyroscopes weigh less when spinning and, to demonstrate this, he showed that he could lift a spinning gyroscope mounted on the end of a rod easily with one hand but could not do so when the gyroscope was not spinning. This was part subject of the BBC science series 'Horizon - 2015-2016: 2. Project Greenglow - The Quest for Gravity Control'.

At this time, Laithwaite suggested that Newton's laws of motion could not account for the behaviour of gyroscopes and that they could be used as a means of reactionless propulsion. The members of the Royal Institution rejected his ideas and his lecture was not published. (This was the first and only time an invited lecture to the Royal Institution has not been published.) They were subsequently published independently as Engineer Through The Looking-Glass.

MES Note: The “Royal” Institution is a disgrace to humanity.

Despite this rejection and the fact that Laithwaite later acknowledged that gyroscopes behave fully in accord with Newtonian mechanics,[3] he continued to explore gyroscopic behaviour, maintaining the belief that some form of reactionless propulsion could be derived from them. Laithwaite set up Gyron Ltd with William Dawson and, in 1993, applied for a patent entitled "Propulsion System". See US5860317,[4] [5][6] for the US, UK and PCT application for patents respectively. A United States Patent, Number 5860317, was granted in 1999.

MES Note: This is one of the most disgusting piles of garbage ever written. As I will demonstrate further below, Eric Laithwaite developed his own theory of “Mass Transfer” to explain the fact, not “belief”, of reactionless propulsion. Eric claimed this concept was still in accordance with Newton’s sacred “Laws”, but nonetheless against mainstream physics, and because he assumed the notion of “conservation of angular momentum”. But even this “conservation” principle is as non-existent as “angular momentum”, as I will demonstrate later in this video.

Although Laithwaite is best known for his ideas concerning gyroscopes, he also held an idea concerning moths. It was that they communicate via ultra short wave electromagnetic phenomena (Inventor in the Garden of Eden, E R Laithwaite 1994 page 199). He persisted in this belief even after the pheromone which they actually use had been isolated[7] and could even be bought "over-the-counter" — seemingly contradicting his account. However, he had argued in 1960[8] that there must be two different mechanisms for detecting pheromones: (i) The orthodox account of chemical-gradients (effective only at short-range), and (ii) some method for long-distance detection (> "100 yards") even when the wind was in an unfavourable direction — and the only credible solution then had to be electromagnetic (probably infrared). This explanation did not account for where the necessary energy might come from — a matter later taken up by P. S. Callahan, though he too suffered considerable controversy (largely due to all contestants overlooking Laithwaite's "(i)/(ii)" distinction).[citation needed]

MES Note: Everything is electromagnetism.

Laithwaite also had a habit of championing the ideas of amateurs over those of experts. Such ideas included the ones that there are three types of magnetism and that the "196 problem" is not a problem: terminating after relatively few iterations (in fact, the current count runs to millions of iterations – with no sign of termination).

MES Note: When “experts” are referenced, bogus fake science usually follows.

Laithwaite retired from Imperial College in 1986, but was offered no other research post until 1990, when he became Visiting Professor at the University of Sussex. He was persuaded by George Scelzo of PRT Maglev Systems in Chicago to submit a proposal to NASA for an electromagnetic launch assist track originally inspired by John Mankins of NASA. He died within weeks of the contract being awarded.

The initial stage has been successfully continued by William Dawson and the contract with PRT for this development is still active. The track uses both levitation coils and linear induction motors and it can be seen in the "Magnets" episode of Modern Marvels on the History channel.


Magnetic Launch Assist System

Published works

Articles

  • A Radiation Theory of the Assembling of Moths The Entomologist, June–July 1960, vol.93(1166–1167), pp. 113–117, 133–137 +plate(III)
  • Eric Laithwaite, "Linear motors for high-speed vehicles", New Scientist, 28 June 1973, p. 802-805
  • "Eric Laithwaite defies Newton", New Scientist, 14 November 1974, p470
  • The multiplication of bananas by umbrellas Electrical Review, 20–27 December 1974, pp. 822–824
  • The bigger they are, the harder they fall Electrical Review, 14 February 1975, pp. 40–42
  • 1975 – A space odyssey Electrical Review, 28 March – 4 April 1975, pp. 398–400
  • Roll Isaac, roll – Part I Electrical Review, Vol. 204, No. 7, 16 February 1979, pp. 38–41
  • Roll Isaac, roll – Part II Electrical Review, Vol. 204, No. 11, 16 March 1979, pp. 31–33
  • Give us a sign Electrical Review, Vol. 207, No. 3, 18 July 1980, pp. 40–42
  • "Gaze in wonder: an engineer looks at biology", (1988), Speculations in Science and Technology, vol.11(4), 341–345.
  • The influence of Michael Faraday on power engineering. Power engineering journal, Vol.5, No. 5, September 1991, pp. 209–219

Books

  • Propulsion without wheels (1965)
  • Induction machines for special purposes (1966)
  • The engineer in wonderland (1967) — The Royal Institution of Great Britain Christmas lectures, 1966/67. With illustrations, including a portrait.
  • The linear motor and its application to tracked hovercraft (1971)
  • Linear electric motors (1971) Mills & Boon Monographs and Technical Library
  • Experiments with a linear induction motor (1971)
  • Exciting electrical machines (1974)
  • All things are possible: an engineer looks at research and development (1976)
  • Transport without wheels ed. (1977)
  • How to invent (1977) co-written by Meredith Thring
  • Why does a glow-worm glow? (1977) illustrated by Mike Jackson
  • Electric energy: its generation, transmission and use (1980) co-written by L.L. Freris
  • Engineer through the looking glass (1980)— a revised and expanded version of his Royal Institution of Great Britain Christmas lectures, 1974/75. With illustrations, including a portrait.
  • Invitation to engineering (1984)
  • Shape is important (1986)
  • Force: a basic ingredient (1986)
  • A history of linear electric motors (1986)
  • Using materials (1987)
  • Size is vital (1987)
  • An inventor in the Garden of Eden (1994)

References

(1) Jump up^ Laithwaite, E.R. "The Goodness of a machine" PROC IEE March 1965 Vol. 112 pp 328-541
(2) Jump up^ [1][permanent dead link]
(3) Jump up^ Interview in Heretics programme BBC TV 1994 (24 mins in)
(4) Jump up^ "Propulsion system".
(5) Jump up^ GB2289757 [permanent dead link]
(6) Jump up^ WO9530832[permanent dead link]
(7) Jump up^ "Isolation of the sex pheromone of the moth Argyroploce leucotreta". Journal of Insect Physiology. 20: 441–450. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(74)90152-8.
(8) Jump up^ http://www.ondwelle.com/Laithw.pdf

External links

  • Obituary at Keelynet
  • Obituary of Professor Eric Laithwaite in the Independent
  • NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project: COMMON ERRORS: Gyroscopic Antigravity a NASA page discussing Laithwaite's demonstration.
  • The Foster-Miller Maglifter project, which has a picture of their linear motor subscale system.
  • The Royal Institution’s 1974-75 Christmas Lecture video
  • This is the Heretic program about Eric Laithewaite towards the end of his career. It explains the battle he had trying to get the scientific community to accept or even investigate his ideas.
  • Repetition of Laithwaite's experiments, with explanations

MES Note: These "explanations" are on par with Veritasium’s bogus fake science.

  • "How Popperian positivism killed a good-but-poorly-presented theory — Insect Communication by Infrared". Ondwelle: Melbourne. (Dec.2005) — a critique of a "debate" over insects and infrared, in which Laithwaite was cited, and yet partly ignored!
  • "Critique of the 1977 debate on infra-red 'olfaction' in insects — (Diesendorf v. P.S.Callahan)"; Conference of the Australian Entomological Society; at Orange, NSW, (30 September 2008).
  • Imperial college 1984 video of Laithwaite's magnetic river in operation

Eric Laithwaite Attempts to Explain Gyroscopic Inertial Propulsion in Terms of Unconventional Newtonian Mechanics

If you had just read the Wikipedia article, you may have the impression that Eric Laithwaite “retracted” his views on gyroscopes and Newtonian mechanics, but nothing could be further from the truth. Eric’s demonstrations that gyroscope precess with zero centripetal force or angular momentum, thus effectively behaving massless, are irrefutable and right in front of your faces; however, you just may need to remove the mainstream fake science indoctrination from your eyes to see it. In later years Eric claims that Newtonian mechanics still could apply to gyroscopes by assuming that momentum can interchange between linear and angular momentum so long as the total “momentum” is “conserved”.

Here is the Wikipedia reference that claims Eric “retracted” his views on gyroscopes. Note that the video is not available on YouTube because the $5 billion USD+ taxpayer funded BBC has a copyright claim on knowledge. #DefundBBC

Wikipedia Reference 3: Interview in Heretics programme BBC TV 1994 (24 mins in)

URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy6hLZ02naM
Retrieved: 26 March 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/8WuyQ

Luckily it is available on Dailymotion.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ya0y4

Retrieved: 26 March 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/cPPsv
Backup Video Download Link: https://1drv.ms/v/s!As32ynv0LoaIh5sxvfDT9KkkVF1Hog

There are some amazing insights and experiments demonstrated in this video. But as usual, clueless mainstream BBC commentary and bogus “critics” shown throughout the video taint what otherwise is a must-see video.

“Mass Transfer” or Reactionless Inertial Propulsion Experiment

Here is the experiment that Eric Laithwaite performed to show that precessing gyroscopes can displace mass. In the experiment he has two gyro wheels hanging by wires and connected with a lightweight support. Initially the spinning wheels are pushed outwards by a compressed spring thus giving a small boost in the direction of precession. The center of mass of is near the relatively heavy wheels themselves. As can be seen, the center of mass, shown by the white line moves forward in the direction of precession, even though there was no horizontal force given.

This experiment was way more complex than it is needed to be, and the wires/support setup may affect how the center of mass is positioned; but nonetheless the result is as expected, the center of mass magically moves due to precession and not any linear forward force.

Essentially, Eric was trying to create a low friction environment to show that there is no “reaction” to the movement of the center of mass. But a better way to demonstrate this is just any basic gyroscope and placed on a block of ice, as the next section shows.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Can Precess Upwards on Ice with Zero Centripetal Force

Eric Laithwaite’s “mass transfer” experiment is just an overly complicated low friction environment with an unnecessary second gyroscope and an unnecessary initial lateral spring force. All you need is a gyroscope precessing on your finger to notice the gyroscope behaves massless. But for the “skeptics”, an ice block will do.

In this particular experiment the gyroscope is placed horizontally to better showcase the “mass transfer”, but the angle was too steep to rise for this particular gyroscope.

https://youtu.be/j82Z1KgfRtI

Retrieved: 19 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/fNvIk

Notice how the ice-block doesn’t move, while the center of mass, which is located near the center of the gyroscope is moving freely around the ice-block.

For this particular gyroscope setup, at a higher angle the gyroscope can magically rise upwards!

https://youtu.be/N6dSx05MpLs

Retrieved: 11 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/EnQ5B

What sorcery is this?!

In both cases, as the gyroscope speed slows down there is no more “mass transfer” as the gyroscope now precesses directly about its center of mass and demonstrated by the ice block moving around.

This is essentially what Eric Laithwaite was trying to demonstrate. Had his gyro wheels not spun, the lateral spring force would simply push the wheels outwards and then back to center as the supporting base moves around 180 degrees to the other side.

Eric Laithwaite’s Mass Transfer Paper and Universal Equation for Gyroscopes

Eric Laithwaite wrote an “Introduction” to his mass transfer concept and argued that the Newtonian “conservation of momentum” principle was enough to comply with the mainstream scientific clergy; which Eric learned that even this wasn’t enough. Using this new concept, he also formulated a formula to try to explain both the precession of gyroscopes due to applied torques, and the generation of torque due to applied or forced precession.

http://www.gyroscopes.org/masstran.asp

Retrieved: 6 April 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/WEPD7

The work we have been doing at the University of Sussex with gyroscopes, or, in the general sense, flywheels, enables mass to be moved linearly without reaction with the surrounding medium, or ether, and without projection or loss of mass from the total. Where there is an existing medium, i.e. on land, sea or air, the rate of generation of momentum appears to be unexciting. However, in the absence of a medium, in space, out of easy reach and requiring extended ability to manoeuvre, this system does not merely come into its own, it is unique. For the first time, it offers a means of imparting linear movement by the delivery of small “parcels” of instantaneous momentum to a vehicle in a manner not too dissimilar from the current way in which space vehicles are re-oriented by the application of the principle of the conservation of angular momentum. Now we can offer a device that will enable a vehicle metaphorically to “Swim through Space”.

MES Note: The ether, or aether, exists.

EXPLANATORY INTRODUCTION TO MASS DISPLACEMENT

MOVING AN OBJECT WITHOUT PUSHING IT.

When we wish to move an object that appears to be stationary with respect to us, it is our common experience that it is necessary to apply a force to cause it to do so. This is because the object possesses mass which gives to the object that characteristic of resisting having its velocity changed, known as inertia. The relationship between these properties was discerned by Newton and is usually written (Force) = (Mass) x (Acceleration).

What Newton actually stated was:- "The force is proportional to the rate of change of Momentum"

So what is momentum, why bother with it?

MES Note: What exactly is “momentum”? What is “mass”? These questions are as big as life itself.

image.png

MES Note: If the masses are not spinning, what should happen is the masses move outwards linearly and the base moves horizontally to the other side as the masses come back to the original position.

image.png

MES Note: If the masses are instead spinning, the entire setup moves linearly, thus the center of mass has changed.

To get an impressive reduction in centrifugal force you need a large heavy wheel with a very thin rim, virtually no spokes or middle, running very fast and being precessed slowly round a small radius.

Experimentally, with a high quality wheel, precessing on a radius about twice that of the wheel, with a spin in excess of 100 times the rate of precession, we have recorded centrifugal forces of less than one tenth of that anticipated from calculation.

MES Note: Amazing results! Now the question to ask is, where is this mystical “centrifugal force” disappearing to?

Toy gyroscopes, made to precess round models of the Eiffel Tower, do so as a result of the torque MgR (see figure 9) derived from the mass of the gyroscope, and the thrust upward exerted by the support on the tower. Experience with gyroscopes of this type gives rise to the idea that torque is the cause of a precession.

In the same way, a gyroscope can be forced to precess in a predetermined path. If the torque so generated is resisted by the framework (or even another gyroscope) and is measured, it will be found that the gyroscope will have demanded just the torque required to make it so precess and that the precession is, in this case the cause of the torque.

If the spin momentum of the wheel is in direction X, (see figure 10), then the torque applied about an axis in Y, at right angles to the plane of the drawing, will produce precession about an axis such as Z, perpendicular to the plane of the drawing.

Interestingly, the gyroscope appears to be unconcerned about the precise location of the axis in Y0, which may be at Y1 or Y2 or etc. . . Yn, so long as they are parallel. Likewise the resulting precession can take place about Z0, or Z1 or Z2 or etc. . . Zn. No particular axis in Y is related to any particular axis of Z.

The following equation is universal.

Torque (about any axis in the Y plane) = Angular-Momentum (of the gyro) x Precessional Angular-Velocity (about any axis in the Z plane)

This is a very interesting paper! I believe he is on the right track regarding his “universal equation” which links together important (but not all) aspects of gyroscopes; which I have also noticed in my experiments:

  • “Torque” either applied to or produced by the gyroscope.
    • Application of torque induces precession.
    • Application of precession induces torque.
  • Gyro mass and spin speed (i.e. “spin angular momentum”).
  • Precessional spin speed.

The concept of generating torque from precession, instead of the more common precession from torque, is one of the most magical and under-investigated aspects of gyroscopes! In fact, as I will go over later in this video, another inventor, the late great Francis McCabe, shows that forced precession can generate even upwards of 1000 times torque over-unity! Thus, I think Eric Laithwaite may have to retract his catering of the assumption of “conservation of momentum”. In fact, I will demonstrate later that “angular momentum” and thus “momentum” in general are just illusions, as is the “conservation” of these illusions itself an illusion.

Also, another aspect that Eric Laithwaite, as well as the entire world, has not accounted for is my bombshell gyroscope rising upwards (and downwards) experiments. Minimizing “rotational friction” causes gyroscopes to magically rise, but even the smallest amount would prevent this. I think a more complete picture of the magical behavior of gyroscopes may require answering the most fundamental question in all of physics: what exactly is “mass”?

Eric Laithwaite Demonstrates That Forced Precession Can Generate Lift!

As Eric Laithwaite formulated in his mass transfer theory, forced precession can induce torque on the gyroscope, even lift the entire gyroscope upwards.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ya0y4

Note that he uses the outer casing to push the gyroscope rod that extends behind it, thus “hurrying the precession”.

Precession = Lift.

Here is an illustration of the spin and precession directions, and the accompanying lift.

Fascinating stuff!

Eric Laithwaite’s Initial Anti-Gravity Wheel Weighed 50 Pounds!

I had thought that Eric only performed his anti-gravity wheel with a 40 lb wheel as shown in #AntiGravity Part 2, but in fact he had done it first with a 50 lb wheel!

Now the question that even Eric would have to ask himself: How can forced precession with one or even two hands generate enough magical “torque” to lift a 50 lb wheel as if it was a feather?

Cambridge University’s Bogus "Repetition of Laithwaite's experiments, with explanations"

From the Wikipedia article’s “External Links” is a link to writings by Emma Wilson from Cambridge University, and just as with the disgraceful, and quite frankly pure evil, coverup of the irrefutable Anti-Gravity Wheel by Veritasium, she looks to continue the theme of blatant gyro magic coverup.

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh1/gyroscopes/htmlgyroscopes.html

Retrieved: 18 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/8hRFT

Virtual Gyroscopes

A gyroscope consists of a spinning mass, mounted so its axis of rotation can change. Examples include toys such as spinning tops and powerballs. Gyroscopic effects are also key to things like yo-yo's and frisbees. We are not regularly exposed to the gyroscopic effect and its motion so gyroscopes can seem strange and weird. There are many myths surrounding their motion such as they are anti-gravity devices, but if we let go of a gyroscope whilst holding one it will of course obey the laws of gravity and fall to the floor.

In 1974 Eric Laithwaite was invited to give a Royal Institution lecture. In this he performed a series of demonstrations involving gyroscopes. He claimed that the outcome of these demonstrations showed that Newton's laws of motion are restricted to motion in straight lines where there is no rate of change of acceleration, and that circular motion has some force all of its own.

Gyroscopic motion does however follow Newton's laws of motion this is shown through the repetition of Laithwaite's demonstrations and explanation of the subsequent motion using Newtonian Mechanics.

MES Note: No, they don’t.

(On this website some formulas, diagrams and explanations taken from Cambridge Engineering 3C5 notes)

Acknowledgement: This page, and all those linked to it, were created by Emma Wilson in 2007 as part of her MEng Thesis at Cambridge University.

MES Note: I have looked online but could not find her thesis. Please let me know if you can find it!

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh1/gyroscopes/laithwaite.html

Retrieved: 18 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/WiPQl

Videos

Laithwaite (1921 - 1997)

Whilst Professor of Electrical Engineering at Imperial College, London, Laithwaite was invited to give a Royal Institution lecture. He chose to demonstrate his >observations on gyroscopic force, coming to a series of false conclusions on gyroscopic motion. As a result proceedings of the lecture were never published.

MES Note: What is wrong this arrogant and ignorant clown?!

The videos of the 1974 lecture can be viewed at http://www.gyroscopes.org/

Repetition of Laithwaite's Demonstrations

The demonstrations in Laithwaite's videos have each been repeated and the observed motion explained using Newtonian Mechanics. The repeated experiments and explanations of the motion can be found via the links below.

It is clear from these that contrary to Laithwaite's claims, circular motion does not have some force all of its own.

MES Note: You mean spiraling upwards movement!

Repeated demonstrations with explanations

The numbering of the videos coincides with the numbering of videos of Laithwaite's original demonstration, seen at http://www.gyroscopes.org/

Videos 1-4: Precession of a Victorian gyroscope.
Video 5: A toy gyroscope precesses on ice.
Video 6: A Gyroscope precesses on a long arm
Video 7: A Gyroscope hangs off the top of a table
Video 8: Precession of a gyroscope on an arm with a double pivot point
Video 9: A gyroscope hangs from the ceiling on a long string
Video 10: A small boy lift a gyroscope, and precesses on a rotating platform as he does so

The two main arguments that Eric Laithwaite made, and are irrefutable, are that Gyroscopes precess with zero angular momentum and zero centripetal force. Emma Wilson ignores the first, likely because it is too difficult to spin, no pun intended. The second, she makes a complete mockery of science. The rest of her “explanations”, I don’t have the time nor will-power to go over such arrogantly “wrong conclusions” since they all depend on the first two arguments.

Recap of Eric Laithwaite’s Demonstration of a Gyroscope Precessing With Zero Centripetal Force

Eric Laithwaite demonstrated that a simple toy gyroscope had always defied mainstream physics, but if only we had the eyes to see.

https://youtu.be/0L2YAU-jmcE

Retrieved: 18 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/Nzwg9

A 312 gram gyroscope precessing about a less than 1 gram pedestal is absolutely irrefutable proof that a gyroscope precesses with zero or near zero “centripetal force”; even without the ice.

3000 Pound Gyro-Car Precessing About a 10 Pound Ladder?

Just think about it for a second. Or maybe scale it up. Can you imagine a 3000 POUND CAR rotating about a 10 pound metal ladder?!

Obviously, this would cause extreme mayhem. But what if the car was spinning like a gyroscope?

It doesn’t take a Cambridge “Educated” Scientician to realize that a gyroscope is pure magic!

Emma Wilson’s Attempt to Debunk the Undebunkable: Gyroscopes Precess with Zero Centripetal Force

The following article by Emma Wilson may very well be the single most pathetic excuse for academic research that has ever been written.

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh1/gyroscopes/icegyro.html

Retrieved: 18 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/Nl5B5

Video 5

Precession of a toy gyroscope on ice

In his video Laithwaite places a toy gyroscope on a tower on ice, it is intended that the ice will provide a frictionless surface. It can be seen that precession occurs as before with the gyroscope precessing around the tower. Laithwaite claims this shows that the gyroscope appears to exhibit no centrifugal force.

It can be seen that the tower has legs which dig into the ice meaning the assumption of a frictionless surface is not valid. Therefore Laithwaite's claim that the gyroscope appears to exhibit no centrifugal force is also invalid.

MES Note: She has a minor point that Eric’s experiment wasn’t truly “frictionless” but doesn’t change the fact that the tower is 1/300 times the weight of the gyro!

This experiment was repeated using an air table to provide a frictionless surface.

MES Note: A quality scientific air table is pretty expensive, but I will look to buy one in the near future when I get enough funds.


Gyroscopic precession on an air table

MES Note: Is this a sick joke? A 1-second video of a gyroscope setup that is nothing like Eric Laithwaite’s and with no accompanying context regarding spin speed, mass, non-spinning mass, etc. Even the center of mass/gravity is hard to pin-point. What is she trying to prove?

Unlike in Laithwaite's demonstration in this case the center of mass of the assembly is seen to remain above a fixed point whilst everything rotates around it. An animation of this demonstration along with animations of other demonstrations can be seen on the flash page.

Explanation of what is happening

The air table provides a flat frictionless surface, therefore there are can be no net lateral force acting upon the assembly.

It can be seen from the diagram that the only forces acting are vertical. Newton's first law tells us that a particle remains at rest so long as there is no unbalanced force acting upon it, when applied to a body this is true of the center of mass. Since the gyroscope and stand have no lateral force acting upon them there is no horizontal unbalanced force, this means that the center of mass of the system must stay above the fixed point that it started out at.

The videos show that the overall center of mass of the gyroscope and stand stay in one place whilst the rest of the assembly precesses around it.

This fake scientific garbage makes me sick to my stomach.

Emma Wilson’s Cartoon Fake Physics

Essentially, Emma is stating that on a frictionless surface, the center of mass will not move unless acted upon by a force.

Here are some of Emma’s cartoons illustrating this cartoonish concept.

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh1/gyroscopes/flash.html

Retrieved: 18 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/V6QQl

Emma purposely chose a gyro-setup that is nothing like Eric’s that makes a proper comparison not feasible.

This is a better illustration of the (non-existent) concept she is trying to demonstrate.

Why doesn’t Emma just replicate this exact experiment instead of making a bogus cartoon?!

Emma Wilson Doesn’t Address the Many Factors That Affect Precession

First of all, where is the center of mass of Emma’s gyroscope? Why is she placing the gyroscope so far away? And most importantly why is she posting a muted 1 second video with no context or explanation?

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~hemh1/gyroscopes/video6.html

Retrieved: 19 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/gtvGY

Why doesn’t she just use a better gyro-setup that has the center of mass further out from the center?!

Some of the many factors that affect precession and gyroscopes overall, which Emma ignores, are listed below:

  • Spin speed.
  • Rotor spinning mass.
  • Overall weight of the non-spinning mass such as the gyro casing, lever arm, and extended counterweight arm.
  • Distance of the spinning mass vs the non-spinning mass to the fulcrum or center.
  • Friction of the bearings, both for horizontal and vertical rotation.
  • Counterweight counters precession and can make gyros appear heavier as demonstrated by my earlier counterweight gyro experiments.

The rotor is small relative to the overall gyro-setup so even if the rotating mass were to lose 100% of its “centrifugal force”, how would she even know? And how would we know she knows since she is literally just showing a bogus 1-second video that demonstrates nothing?

How can Emma get a degree for displaying such a mockery of physics?

My Ice Experiments Validate Eric Laithwaite and Debunk Emma Wilson

My earlier ice experiments already demonstrated gyroscopes precessing with zero centrifugal force, while even having the ability to rise magically upwards!

Interestingly enough, as the gyro loses spin speed it behaves much like her cartoon physics as the center of mass is now moved back near the center of the gyro-wheel.

So yes, even cartoon physics are valid when proper context is given.

Shout Out to “woopyjump” and “jogglevision” YouTube Channels for Also Seeing Through Bogus Cambridge Fake Science!

Many inventors and free thinkers have seen the obvious anti-centrifugal ability of gyroscopes, and a couple of these great people even called out the fake physics of Emma Wilson!

https://youtu.be/qyqyX7jgjZU

Retrieved: 21 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/ntN2Z

woopyjump’s experiment involved a precessing gyroscope on a free to rotate (in one direction) platform.

“jogglevision” also debunks Emma’s debunking of the undebunkable.

https://youtu.be/zi2KyoUIHAM

Retrieved: 21 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/gCnP7

jogglevision’s experiment involves hanging a gyroscope via a string to see it precess about the non-center of mass.

This is essentially the same as the famous “precessing tire on a string” experiment.

Famous Precessing Bicycle Wheel Experiment Has Always Demonstrated Zero Centripetal/Centrifugal Force

Everyone has seen a bicycle wheel directly defy gravity (you just have to remove the “angular momentum” blindfolds) when hanging by a string, but few have ever noticed that it is also not exhibiting any “centrifugal” or “centripetal” force!

Even the world famous Walter Lewin, throughout his entire lecture, does not see the blatant anti-centripetal/anti-centrifugal force magic being displayed by gyroscopes.

https://youtu.be/XPUuF_dECVI

Retrieved: 21 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/tueq8

Note the very little horizontal movement of the rope support as the bicycle wheel magically precesses. Reversing the spin direction reverses the precession direction.

Note that as Walter adds an extra weight to the bicycle wheel it precesses faster. But with a keen eye, you can notice the rope support moves horizontally outwards in precession since the non-spinning mass has what the spinning wheel doesn’t: “angular momentum”. Neither Walter nor the “torque” equations accounts, or even notice it.

Furthermore, simply stating “spin angular momentum” does not account for how a rolling wheel automatically adjusts any imbalance thus constantly rising or precessing upwards, much like my gyro rising experiments.

Similarly, this mystical and soon to be revealed non-existent illusion known as “spin angular momentum” does not and never did explain how spinning tops magically auto-balance and the universally ignored ability of rising upwards against gravity.

But even without the “elaborate” hanging gyroscope demonstration (or my ice experiments or even Eric’s toy pedestal experiment), just a gyroscope precessing around your finger instead of throwing itself outwards is enough proof that “centripetal force” is modifiable.

#Magic

Gyroscopes Precess with Zero “Angular Momentum”

Conveniently, the other irrefutable bombshell finding of Eric Laithwaite, that gyroscopes precess with zero angular momentum as if they were massless, is nowhere to be found in Emma Wilson’s coverup writings.

Lack of centrifugal force and lack of angular momentum go hand-in-hand as both suggest “mass” is disappearing somewhere “else”. #Counterspace

https://youtu.be/0zGCXrUFiSM

Retrieved: 17 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/Ezhwv

Gyroscopes in precession literally behave massless! #Magic

Let’s use the same car example to illustrate the implications of this means:

Anyone can be stronger than a moving a car, but only if it were precessing.


View All Parts

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept

Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2

Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3
Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4
Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5
Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7

Full #AntiGravity Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!