☝#AntiGravity Part 6: Objects in Rotation Defy ‘Mainstream’ Physics + MES Duality Concept (Notes 4)

in antigravity •  5 months ago  (edited)

Video 1

Video 2

Due to YouTube video length restrictions, Part 6 is split into two videos. The sections in the first video are shown below with their accompanying times in the video.

(1) @ 1:34 - Important Links and Notes
(2) @ 5:45 - Introduction
(3) @ 8:37 - Table of Contents
(4) @ 55:56 - #MESExperiments Science Experiments Video Series
(5) @ 58:08 - General Notes on Scientific Exploration
(6) @ 1:06:01 - Clearing Eric Laithwaite’s Name
(7) @ 2:25:11 - Eric Laithwaite’s Unconventional Interpretation of Newtonian Mechanics
(8) @ 3:06:30 - Cambridge University’s Bogus Fake Science and Coverup of Gyro Magic
(9) @ 4:04:00 - TOP SECRET: The Movie Inception and Spinning Tops
(10) @ 4:07:06 - Overview of Conventional Physics Regarding Spinning Tops, Gyroscopes, and Objects in Rotation
(11) @ 4:52:03 - Overview of Newton’s Laws and Einstein’s Relativity
(12) @ 5:28:39 - Owen Liang’s Gyro Space Top Proves Spin Angular Momentum is an Illusion
(13) @ 7:06:33 - INCEPTION IS REAL: Are We Living in a Dream?
(14) @ 7:07:36 - Exploring Owen Liang’s Many Unnecessary Accounts
(15) @ 9:00:10 - Owen Liang’s Battle with Wikipedia
(16) @ 9:19:47 - Francis McCabe and Gyro 1000X+ Torque Over Unity!

The following sections are shown in the second video.

(17) @ 0:00 - Inertial Propulsion and Inertial Lift are Facts of Life
(18) @ 52:58 - Tippy Tops and Phi Tops Demonstrate Rising with Spin Axis Change
(19) @ 1:54:32 - The Amazing and Underappreciated Gyrocompass
(20) @ 2:50:48 - The Concept of Inertia and Coherency
(21) @ 3:03:39 - Overview of Mainstream Clueless Science Regarding Gyroscopes and Objects in Rotation
(22) @ 3:45:51 - SUMMARY OF MY SELF-APPOINTED PHD
(23) @ 5:10:57 - MES DUALITY BREAKTHROUGH CONCEPT
(24) @ 5:53:35 - AREAS OF FURTHER RESEARCH
(25) @ 7:37:52 - Exploring the True Nature of Gravity, Mass, Magnetism, Electricity, Light, and Reality
(26) @ 7:48:05 - David LaPoint’s Primer Fields, the Ferrocell, and Ken Wheeler’s Magnetism
(27) @ 10:29:19 - THE TO KEY GYROSCOPIC MAGIC IS ‘COUNTERSPACE’
(28) @ 11:05:58- True Magnetism and the Interconnectedness of All Things

Stay tuned for #AntiGravity Part 7!


Watch Video On:

Download my PhD:

Full #AntiGravity Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


View PhD Below

View All Parts

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept
Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2

Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3

Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4
Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5
Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7


#AntiGravity Part 6 Objects in Rotation Defy Physics Zoomed 2.jpeg

Francis McCabe 1000X+ Torque Over-Unity Large Gyro Wheel!

The earlier sections showcased simple experiments by Eric Laithwaite, Owen Liang, and MES (i.e. me) that demonstrate “angular momentum” is just an illusion, and ironically much like the “pseudo” concept that Wikipedia defines it as. Another brilliant inventor that demonstrates this finding is the late great Francis McCabe. He lived from 3 May 1936 to 15 March 2014 and was a former Rocket Scientist that worked for both NASA and Boeing before moving to the much more difficult Gyro Science. Francis takes gyroscopes to a level that even I had not imagined would be possible.

Francis demonstrates the illusion of “angular momentum” in his famous Large Gyro Wheel experiment while simultaneously showing that a small motor can generate over 1000 times its rated torque output but only when it is precessing! Take some time to truly ponder this:

A 1000X+ Torque Over-Unity

https://steemit.com/mesexperiments/@mes/mesexperiments-8-large-gyro-wheel-precesses-at-1000x-torque-over-unity-freeenergy

Retrieved: 31 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/dOQdN

image.png

image.png

Over-unity, Free Energy, and Anti-Gravity is screaming right in front of our faces!

Precession Gives the Illusion of “Angular Momentum”

This image is self-explanatory and illustrates Francis’ experiment.

image.png

A motor with a maximum torque rating of 1 inch-pounds essentially means that it can maintain sustained spin speed of a 1 lb wheel at a horizontal distance of 1 inch from the rotor. But when the wheel is allowed to precess freely on a low friction surface, a rotating platform, or hung up by a wire, then the precession appears to magically remove the torque, allowing the motor to maintain and even increase in spin speed but at absurd amounts of weight, even a 1000 lb wheel!

Thus, the pseudo-concept of “angular momentum” is not what maintains a gyroscope in precession since it can’t even maintain spin speed when it is physically supported. It appears that “precession” itself may be the main candidate that is holding up the gyroscope.

The Magical Potential of Gyro Over-Unity Power

Let’s think about what the great Francis McCabe has demonstrated. A motor capable of only spinning a 1 pound bicycle wheel, can nonetheless power a 1000 pound motorcycle but only if its “precessing”!

image.png

Absolute ludicrous magic!

Manually Powered Gyro Precession Over-Unity Power Generator?!

Now the question that must be asked: how (not if) can we turn gyro-precession over-unity into usable energy?

image.png

Is the secret to free energy installing a large manually powered precessing gyroscope in the home of everyone in the world? #IThinkSo

Francis McCabe’s 88X Torque Over-Unity Oscillating Gyro Piston Prototype

Francis demonstrates the practical applications of gyro torque over unity by creating a prototype of a piston generated from the back and forth oscillations during forced precession of gyro wheels.

https://youtu.be/-TEzFBQoKJk

Retrieved: 2 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/38gkv

image.png

image.png

This is absolutely amazing!

Here is a simple illustration of a compressed air cylinder piston:

http://blog.parker.com/know-your-pneumatics-single-or-double-acting-choosing-the-right-cylinder

Retrieved: 7 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/Xn4OO

image.png

Essentially the compression of air builds up in pressure and can generate force on the piston.

image.png

Here are the stats that McCabe describes regarding his Gyro Piston/Dynamo:

  • The piston exerts upwards 210 pounds of force at about 10 inches from the fulcrum, thus 210*10 = 2,100 inch-pounds of torque is required to compress the piston.
  • The precession rotor is capable of 21 inch-pounds.
  • The gyro-wheels rotor is capable of about 3 inch-pounds.
  • Total output torque / total input torque = 2,100 in-lb / 24 in-lb = 87.5 Torque over-unity!

When the gyro-wheels aren’t spinning, the piston barely moves but shakes a bit mainly from the imbalance of the overall setup. When the gyro-wheels are rotating, forced precession from the precession rotor cause the gyroscopes to exert massive amounts of torque far greater than the combined input of the two rotors are capable of. This torque is manifested through the oscillating back and forth motion of the gyro-setup as it acts upon the piston. This oscillation motion is due to the forced precession constantly switching directions as the gyro-wheels twist.

Over Unity Gyro Piston Powered Car?

Imagine this simple gyro torque over-unity piston mechanism being used to power cars with extremely low amounts of electrical input power.

image.png

Over Unity Compact Gyro Piston Powered Bicycle?

What about a manually self-charging small gyro-piston bike?!

image.png

Over Unity Giant Gyro Piston Power Plant?

The possibilities are endless!

image.png

#AGreenNewDeal

Eric Laithwaite Demonstrated Forced Precession Gyro Torque Over-Unity in 1974 Lecture

This is actually the same “over-unity” or gyro super torque power generation that Eric Laithwaite demonstrated in his 1974 lecture, and which I have shown in #AntiGravity Part 1.

http://www.rigb.org/christmas-lectures/watch/1974/the-engineer-through-the-looking-glass/the-time-has-come-the-walrus-said

Retrieved: 27 January 2018
Archive: https://archive.is/nXpE7

image.png

image.png

Notice how the gyroscope wants to rise upwards while chaotically shaking the entire table back and forth! Gyros have the ability to demonstrate zero mass or creating a ripple in the aether.

image.png

In this case, the rate of precession is increased, hence “forced precession”, from the spinning shaft rolling forward on the enclosed roof, hence like a rolling wheel.

image.png

Eric Laithwaite stated that the rolling of the shaft on the roof was the cause of the forced precession, but I believe another big factor is the actual pushing downwards by the roof on the shaft.

Forced precession induces rising torque, but downwards torque induces forced precession… #ForceMultiplier

This may be why the small gyro wheel can shake the entire table and enclosure.

MES BOMSHELL DISCOVERY: Downwards Torque Induces Forced Precession Which Induces Rising Torque?!

As I alluded to above regarding Eric Laithwaite’s forced precession powerful torque generation experiment, the downwards push by the roof itself is causing forced precession which thus creates a cycle of multiplicative rising torque generation.

I had demonstrated earlier for a spinning top which rises instantly when weight is added! Without the weight that particular spinning top takes minutes to rise.

image.png

This is also true for a gyroscope; on a needle just for magical fun.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Can Rise Upwards Faster When Weight is Added and Can Rise Even on a Needle

These needle-gyro-weight-added experiments may be some of the most amazing, yet simple experiments ever performed!

https://youtu.be/2tkkiGtsnpI

Retrieved: 15 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/Nltem

image.png

Without any added putty this toy gyroscope rises in about 27 seconds.

image.png

https://youtu.be/YwRxOVQAKYw

Retrieved: 15 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/SyMhP

image.png

With a 30% by weight added putty, the gyroscope rises in about 12 seconds, albeit unevenly since the overall weight of the putty is too much for the gyro. Adding weight can double the speed of gyro rising?! What kind of upside down world do we live in?

image.png

Let’s increase the putty weight and increase the rotor speed to see what happens.

https://youtu.be/q7tcwjMKM7g

Retrieved: 15 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/fGiDl

image.png

image.png

The gyroscope rises instantly and then chaotically breaks the needle!!

image.png

image.png

Precessing wheels are the definition of magic.

Francis McCabe Demonstrates Precession Requires No Additional Power Input Even at Torque Over-Unity

As Francis demonstrated in his earlier over-unity demonstrations, the gyro wheel requires no additional electrical power to power the wheel during precession, be it forced or “natural”. In fact, he states that the electrical input is less than is required to simply spin the wheel without any applied torque!

MES Note: “Natural” precession is nonetheless still “forced” as my earlier demonstrations showed that adding weight increases the rate precession. Thus, the very weight of the gyro-wheel can be considered as a form of “forced precession”.

The following demonstration involves Francis “forcing the precession” by simply applying a spin that is counter to the gyro spin direction, which makes it rise magically upwards but with no change to the input power; thus torque over-unity, magical gyro rising, massless gyro behavior, inertial lift, and all while no extra input power is required or even could do with less! #MagicMagicMagic

https://youtu.be/OPTlhIY-swc

Retrieved: 28 May 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/ji3hf

image.png

image.png

Note that from his statements in the video compared with his video title and description, the torque over-unity is either 240/16 = 15X or 280/6.38 = 43.89X; either way, it is impressive! Also note that the applied forced precession as well as the input power to turn the gyro wheels require no extra input all while generating over-unity torque and inertial magical lift.

Clueless “Critics” Need to Remove the Blindfold Covering Their Minds

Once again, reactionary delusional comments and the illusion of “angular momentum” rear its presence downplaying and covering up gyro free energy torque over unity magic with the most dangerous mindset of all:

Arrogant and/or overly confident ignorance.

Note the following commenter is more on the overly confident side and less on the arrogant side as compared with previous commenters covered earlier.

image.png

Literally, these clowns need to stop posting unthinking comments towards people that go through the effort of actually building and experimenting. Instead of posting the first thought that comes to mind, why doesn’t Tim consider for a second that maybe this retired rocket scientist has already entertained possible conventional explanations which is why he spent the countless hours required in developing the device?!

Seriously, is it too much to ask to put oneself in another person’s shoes?

Tim brings up the bogus non-existent “angular momentum” term which he doesn’t define what it is or how it is “storing kinetic energy” from “mechanical energy” which was converted from “electrical energy” which was “enough energy stored” in the battery to lift the precessing wheel (far in excess what it is rated to do).

What in the world does this nonsense mean?! And what world is Tim living in?!

Tim also makes a bogus irrelevant analogy to a pully system lifting a 10 lb weight with a small AAA battery that requires 2 hours (although his experiment does sounds pretty epic). Francis is lifting a heavy wheel in real time, in seconds not 2 hours, and with no extra power input required; again, lifting upwards as well as maintaining spin speed through just turning the top handle; i.e. “forced precession” counter to the gyro spin direction is causing inertial magical rising lift with no reaction or even shaking of the supports all while the spin speed and input power is not affected. This is as absolute magic as it gets, but just requires Tim to remove the blindfold covering his mind to see it.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes Exert “Inertial Forces” With Zero Loss in Spin Speed

In one of the most game-changing, yet simple, experiments of all time, my #MESExperiments Part 3 video demonstrated that gyroscopes exert “inertial” resistance to manually twisting or even magical upwards precession with zero additional loss of spin speed relative to a stationary gyroscope. This confirms Francis McCabe’s findings while further discrediting the mainstream “conservation of (non-existent) angular momentum”.

https://youtu.be/LzOf-jwO3BY

Retrieved: 17 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/BSvmp

image.png

image.png

Guess the “conservation” of the illusion of “angular momentum” is itself an illusion… #ConservationOfDelusion

Wikipedia Deletes Francis McCabe’s Wikipedia Page a Few Days Ago…

Literally a few days ago on April 8th, I noticed that Francis Joseph McCabe’s Wikipedia page was being listed for deletion, and then shortly later it gets deleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_J._McCabe

Retrieved: 12 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/M1YvR

image.png

Such an absolute disgrace.

Fortunately, I Archived His Wikipedia Page

It was a matter of fate that I archived his Wikipedia page just before it got deleted. Below are screenshots of the full webpage as well as the direct reference links.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_J._McCabe

Retrieved: 8 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/dbwIx

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

References

(1) ^ a b c d e "Francis J. McCabe, inventor and business owner". Chestnut Hill Local. March 26, 2014.
(2) ^ "Francis Joseph McCabe". Varcoe-Thomas Funeral Home of Doylestown.
(3) ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o "Global Solutions To End Pollution". Fran McCabe.com.
(4) ^ a b c d e f g Lou Mancinelli (January 8, 2013). "Mt. Airy Inventor finds new uses for the gyroscope". Chestnuthill Local.
(5) ^ "Patents by Inventor Francis J. McCabe". Justia Patents.
(6) ^ a b c d e f g h i "Francis McCabe Inducted into Worldwide Who's Who for Excellence in Mechanical Engineering and Aerodynamics". Worldwide Who's Who. July 27, 2013. Mr. McCabe holds more than 100 patents in various industries
(7) ^ "McCabe, Francis J." World Science Database.
(8) ^ "Thermal and Thermal Electric McCabe Resettable Fire Links" (PDF). PHL Links.
(9) ^ "McCabe Resettable Bi_Metal Fire Links". Brooks Equipment.
(10) ^ "PHL Links". PHL Links, Bay City, Michigan. For over 35 years, the McCabe® RESETTABLE Bi-metal Link has set the gold standard for both Thermal and Thermal Electric releasing devices in the fire and smoke protection industry.
(11) ^ "Innovation in Life Safety". Prefco.
(12) ^ "Report of Materials and Equipment Acceptance Division"(PDF). NYC Department of Buildings. November 2007.
(13) ^ "Prefco (USA) - Fire/Smoke Control System". Anyway Engineering.
(14) ^ "Air propulsion apparatus with windmill having multiple windmill blades to enhance performance". Justia Patents.
(15) ^ "United States Patent Application Publication" (PDF). Google Documents. Image of vehicle
(16) ^ Ed Kracz (May 26, 2008). "Power the wind". Philly Burbs. Archived from the original on September 24, 2008.
(17) ^ "Francis J. McCabe". Worldwide Branding Lifetime Achievement. October 15, 2013.

External links

  • McCabe on Lehigh Valley's PBS
  • Report On A Gyroscope Workshop Set Up To Survey Mechanical Gyro Properties Of Forces, Torques, Motions; And Inertia Mechanics by Francis J. McCabe
  • Natural Science Fundamentals In Orbits, Translations And Gyro Physics Francis J. McCabe (2005)

The works of a genius that discovered some of the most important and reality defying properties of physics, has been removed from the public mainstream consciousness. Looks like I was destined to keep alive the work of the many great people before me.

Inertial Propulsion and Inertial Lift are Facts of Life

Many inventors have developed “inertial propulsion” gyro-related machines and all of them appear to exploit the gyroscopes magical ability to exert torque perpendicular to the direction of forced precession. Some examples of this phenomena are shown below, but first an important note needs to be made about how forcing the precession in either direction affects gyroscopes.

Importance of Gyroscopes Forced Precession Causing Rising or Dropping

As the gyro magic cover-upper Veritasium stated, gyroscopes (magically) rise when precession is forced by drop when precession is countered. Note that as I stated earlier, Veritasium is not using a precise enough weigh scale to detect weight reading changes as the center of mass is rising. Veritasium also unnecessarily adds a counterweight which acts against precession and brings the center of mass closer to the fulcrum which together with the gyro setup and fulcrum being clamped prevent both inertial lift of the entire gyro setup and also minimizes any possible weight reading changes; i.e. Veritasium is insulting science as much as humanity in general.

https://youtu.be/tLMpdBjA2SU

image.png

image.png

This magical property of gyroscopes is essential in understanding inertial propulsion and inertial lift. And as stated earlier, even the weight of a gyroscope and slower spin speed can act as forced precession.

Combing this property of gyroscopes with the fact that they can exert massive torque over unity while still behaving massless in precession is the reason why many gyro inventions demonstrate inertial propulsion, or “action without reaction”.

MES Experiments Demonstrating Inertial Propulsion and Inertial Lift

My simple gyro ice experiments demonstrate both phenomena.

https://youtu.be/j82Z1KgfRtI

image.png

Note that just the weight of the gyroscope act can be considered as producing “forced precession” thus causing the gyroscope to rise upwards.

https://youtu.be/N6dSx05MpLs

image.png

My weighted spinning tops and gyro experiments demonstrated inertial heavy and quick lifting!

https://youtu.be/Ad7omOeeSaY

image.png

Here it is evident that the heavy added weights are “forcing the precession” and thus causing magical inertial rising.

https://youtu.be/q7tcwjMKM7g

image.png

And my counterweight experiments show that gyros can exhibit inertial lift downwards!

https://youtu.be/V8fEyoxfykk

Retrieved: 10 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/GEJlF

image.png

Here the counterweight acts to “force” the precession in the reverse direction and hence the gyroscope moves downwards.

Precession Direction and Gyro Spin Direction Tend to Line Up Opposite of Vertical Force

What’s very interesting is that the direction of precession is such the gyro spin direction wants to line up with it and in opposite direction to the vertical forced applied to it.

Thus, despite gravity and even a heavy weight added to it, a gyro can rise and align both spin and precession directions.

image.png

And likewise, a vertical upwards force causes a gyroscope spin and precession direction to line up but instead the gyro magically moves downwards.

image.png

This is another key factor in designing inertial propulsion systems, and in understanding inventions that claim to demonstrate this.

Eric Laithwaite Demonstration Gyro Inertial Lift Through Forced Precession

Recall from earlier in this video that Eric Laithwaite had demonstrated that forcing the precession can cause the gyro to spiral upwards, even generating lift of the entire gyro setup.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ya0y4

image.png

Note the difference in real science by Eric Laithwaite as compared with the fake science by Veritasium in which they clamped the gyroscope so that it wouldn’t demonstrate inertial lift at the fulcrum; hence lift the entire gyro setup upwards.

MES BOMBSHELL REALIZTION: Very Little Forced Precession is Required to Generate Lift

The earlier demonstrations of forced precession generating massive torque over unity even in the 1000X+ range also means that it is possible to generate lift of heavy gyroscopes with very little force during forced precession.

This realization comes from revisiting Eric Laithwaite’s demonstration of pushing a heavy 24 pound precessing wheel with just a finger, yet it effortlessly rises upwards even generating lift at the attached base.

https://youtu.be/oPLCMSK9Syw

Retrieved: 22 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/Ksh3H

image.png

Torque over-unity and inertial lift propulsion was always hiding in plain sight!

Even Francis McCabe’s torque over-unity gyro demonstrates the incredibly low amounts of power input required, both in the electrical power to spin the gyro and the tiny amount of manual torque he applies to the lever as he force-precesses the gyro, to magically lift the gyro upwards in precession. Interestingly he states that hindering the precession demonstrates high torque reading as the lever becomes more rigid and the gyro drops magically downwards; as if it realized or regained its “mass”.

https://youtu.be/OPTlhIY-swc

image.png

My gyro on a string experiments show that simply twirling a gyro opposite to the gyro spin direction is enough for it to rise magically upwards.

https://youtu.be/HLGKe8Q2Tu8

image.png

Likewise, spinning counter to the gyro spin direction further enhances gyro stability since the spins are aligned.

image.png

In fact, even just the simple and extremely weak unwinding of the string is enough to cause the gyro to tilt upwards slightly.

image.png

And again, if the unwinding is in the same direction as the gyro spin direction, further stability is once again enhanced, and in this case more clearly demonstrated.

image.png

This realization is also evident with Eric’s anti-gravity gyro as Eric is inputting very little forced precession motion with his hand and not only is the heavy gyro-wheel magically lifting upwards but it appears not to push downwards anywhere near what its stationary mass equivalent would be expected too.

https://youtu.be/VUh6QXe4mMY

image.png

This is the demonstration that officially opened the doors to the magical true science that awaits us, if only we have eyes to see and mind to comprehend.

The Inertial Propulsion Invention by Alex Jones that Thrust Eric Laithwaite into the Magical World of Gyroscopes

The original invention that flipped Eric Laithwaite’s view of the sacred Newtonian mechanical world was a simple gyro propulsion device, and by non-other than a person named Alex Jones.

MES Note: Not to be confused with the controlled opposition punching bag by both mainstream and alternative media, Alex Jones of “Info Wars”.

Recall the demonstration from the BBC “Heretics” documentary I showed earlier, but I have also included a YouTube video of the specific clip, that also includes the patent number.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ya0y4

image.png

Applying the spin directions and forced precession direction due to gravity on the tilted gyroscope, it becomes clear just what is happening.

https://youtu.be/X5kkoiW3iaY

Retrieved: 9 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/mm6yZ

image.png

The forced precession is in the direction opposite to the natural precession, which is to align with spin direction, thus the gyroscope is forced to move or “inertially lift” in the opposite direction.

This is essentially like my gyroscope counterweight dropping experiments but in this case the gyroscope is attached at a tilted angle and the forced counter precession is from the sideways tilt due to gravity.

image.png

LOL Yup, something like that! #UseYourImaginationPeople

The Famous Sandy Kidd Invention that Generates Lift Through Forced Precession

Another inventor that looked up to Eric Laithwaite was Sandy Kidd whom said that he started tinkering with gyros after watching Eric Laithwaite’s angular momentum and centrifugal force defying Christmas lectures. His invention involves two spinning wheels on opposite sides that can move inwards if the gyros lift upwards. The setup is such that forced precession is in the direction that the gyros spin directions would want to rise upwards. Thus, forced precession should cause the gyros to rise upwards, and even carrying the whole platform upwards a few inches!

https://youtu.be/G5qlOahrQJ8

Retrieved: 9 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/CVLvy

image.png

A better demonstration is shown in the part 3 video, as well as a letter from Sandy Kidd to Professor Simon Holland regarding his latest invention that includes strain gauges to measure the loss of “angular momentum” as the gyros speed up.

https://youtu.be/HAckjYtdig0

Retrieved: 13 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/A3pbs

image.png

Although this is a fascinating device, the fact that the center of mass only moves up a very small distance and I assume for only a short time period means that any possible weight measurements will be difficult to detect since there is only a small window of opportunity for detecting the weight changes due to a changing center of mass. Eric Laithwaite’s forced precession gyro inertial lift demonstration is a much more clear example of inertial lift as the gyro literally launches itself upwards relatively high!

Important Note on Sandy Kidd’s Invention

I have read online from Sandy Kidd that he mentioned he tested out different speeds and alternating speeds of the gyros and said these were maybe necessary to generate lift. But I also read, from him as well, that he could make the gyros lift even at the same uniform speeds. I couldn’t find much documentation on his invention, but if you can get in contact with him (or you are Sandy himself), please tell him to elaborate further on exactly the inner workings of his invention. Nonetheless, I believe my description of how it behaves and the similarities with the other experiments shown in this video provide an accurate view of how his invention generates lift.

YouTube Experimenter “woopyjump" Demonstrates Horizontal Inertial Propulsion

Recall that Laurent from the YouTube channel “woopyjump” and his debunking of the bogus fake physics of Cambridge University’s Emma Wilson regarding her coverup of gyroscopes precessing without “centrifugal force”. Laurent goes further and demonstrates that this lack of “centrifugal force” is also the key to generating horizontal inertial propulsion.

Just like in the previous inertial propulsion and inertial lift inventions, it appears that forced precession is the main cause of the inertial propulsion. Laurent takes it further by using the property of gyroscopes to precess with disappearing mass to make a semi-continuously inertially propelling (or paddling) gyro-setup; much like the gyro-rowing boat that Eric Laithwaite promised “Prince” Charles he would make. The setup includes two precessing gyros that precess in one direction with zero “angular momentum” (and thus no “reaction”) and then get forced to precess in the opposite direction thus causing semi-downwards / horizontal thrust.

https://youtu.be/rKUrKHQDO4c

Retrieved: 10 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/OXySp

image.png

On smooth bearings and a slightly tilted table, the gyros can still push forward a relatively heavy TV remote controller! Amazing stuff.

Disappearing Mass During Natural Precession and Reappearing During Forced Precession Causes “Action Without Reaction”?

In the above experiment, it also appears that as the gyro naturally precess “massless”, the forced precession “brings back” this disappearing/reappearing mass thus causing a horizontal thrust before disappearing (back into the “aether”?) as it wants to naturally precess again thus avoiding any “reaction”.

This is more evident in Laurent’s simple tilted gyroscope experiment where the precession just hits a barrier, thus propelling the whole platform forward but without “reaction” since the mass disappears again as it resets its natural precession.

https://youtu.be/1Grv5B7AqkE

Retrieved: 8 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/oArSR

image.png

The gyroscope is literally paddling a gyro boat on the shores of the aether!

Harvey Fiala’s Inertial Propulsion Device

Recall also the earlier invention by Harvey Fiala about a precessing gyroscope that propels forward when precession is hindered through a sloped upwards ramp.

https://youtu.be/sy8znYK8EXg

image.png

Here is his patent for reference: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090183951A1/en

Tippy Top and the Phi Top Demonstrate Gyro Magical Rising While Changing Spin Axis

My earlier experiments with gyroscopes and spinning tops showcased their magical abilities of torque over-unity rising against the direction of the sum of gravity, magnetic forces, applied torque, counterweight torque, or combinations of these, and with zero loss in spin speed or extra input power required to spin the wheel or in the applied torque for forced precession. In other words, pure magic was demonstrated. But another branch of rotational mechanics that adds another piece to this magical puzzle involves spinning tops that can change spin axis, while still magically rising. Two particular tops are the Tippy Top (or tippe top) and the Phi Top.

Mainstream (Bogus) Review of Phi Tops and Tippy Tops

Let’s first review what another big bogus mainstream (fake) science 1.2 million+ subscribers YouTube channel, “Physics Girl” funded by the United States Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and even Lockheed Martin military arms research, weapons, and endless war dealer, has to say about these magical toys.

https://youtu.be/1Tx7FgZuV3U

Retrieved: 13 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/8Ls6B

image.png

Essentially spinning an egg shape or even most oblong disk shaped objects will magically want to raise its center of mass.

image.png

This is the same for the Tippy Top:

image.png

image.png

Interestingly enough Nobel Prize winners Wolfgang Pauli and Niels Bohr were fascinated by the tippy
top.

image.png

When the “mathematics” of basic spinning tops is extremely complex, maybe it’s a sign that the underlying mainstream physics is just flat out wrong.

image.png

The usual bogus assumption of “conservation of energy” is brought up.

image.png

No, it doesn’t.

Another bogus assumption is brought up: “sliding friction” somehow provides magical rising upwards torque.

image.png

This image and randomly drawn arrow does not qualify as science.

PBS YouTube Channel “Physics Girl” Enters “Veritasium” and Cambridge University Level of Mockery of Physics

I had initially thought Physics Girl made a fairly straight forward observation that phi tops and tippy tops don’t rise on low friction environments such as ice.

image.png

But it wasn’t until almost a full year later that I realized that this test was one of the worst displays of bogus fake science ever conducted; or likely even worse and serve as a simple yet effective way of shifting people’s focus from real physics.

When zoomed in, the ice appears a bit wet and the tippy top on the side appears to be stuck to the ice.

image.png

This is not a “low friction” environment!

In fact, this is the opposite of “low friction” when dealing with metallic spinning tops, as will be demonstrated in the next section.

MES Real Science Low Friction Ice Experiments

Different materials behave differently under different conditions. For example, metallic materials “conduct” heat more readily than plastic or wooden materials. Hence, when metallic materials are placed on ice the difference in temperature from the ice and the metal will look to reach “equilibrium” much faster and thus metal melts the ice instantly; as shown in the following video.

https://youtu.be/LQhXw6kTeYQ

Retrieved: 16 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/11yJR

image.png

Notice how difficult it is to remove the metal tops from the ice.

image.png

This is not a low friction environment!

image.png

For wooden or plastic tops, they don’t conduct heat well so they can maintain a temperature differential for a lot longer, and thus the ice doesn’t melt quickly.

image.png

For these materials, ice can then be classified as a “low friction” environment, assuming the ice itself is not wet.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Frozen Phi Top and Tippy Top Rise on Ice!

One way to ensure as little ice melting as possible is by simply freezing the aluminum tops beforehand. This lowers the temperature differential between the ice and the tops.

image.png

The frozen Phi Top rises easily, but interestingly comes back down right away.

https://youtu.be/NDxN_euE9jY

Retrieved: 16 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/f2OpV

image.png

Was this so hard to do for the 1 million+ Subscribers "Physics Girl"?!

Likewise, the tippy top also rises easily on ice, but drops back down very quickly.

https://youtu.be/Jd0ku-vaE7Y

Retrieved: 16 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/A7tiR

image.png

Notice how easily the spinning top glides across the ice since there is extremely low friction!

MES Semi-BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Phi Tops and Tippy Tops Have Difficulty Maintaining Risen Position After Rising

As shown in the above experiments, in both cases the frozen phi top and tippy top fall back down very quickly after initially rising on ice. If the tops were instead spun in their risen position from the very start, they would actually spin much longer on the low friction ice surface. This indicates that as the tippy top and phi top rise upwards on ice, their spin speeds has lowered more than on relatively high friction surfaces.

As the tops rise, their spin axes are (magically) changing, and this change is in a direction such that friction on the surface can assist in increasing spin speed as the top is rolling. A good analogy for this is winter car tires that provide better traction on ice and snow.

This is better illustrated by viewing how the top behaves in super slow motion.

Tippy Top in Slow Motion Shows Amazing Spin Axis Change, Reverse Spinning, and Upwards Launch

This video has a better and slower slow motion camera than mine, so this video will do.

https://youtu.be/XCCyXhjIL6M

Retrieved: 24 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/0XmXj

image.png

image.png

The tippy top initially spins about its vertical spin axis, then quickly drops down towards spinning only horizontally (thus no longer spinning about its vertical spin axis), and then launches itself upwards and spins again on its now upside down vertical spin axis and in the relative reverse direction. Fascinating stuff!

MES Semi-BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Tippy Tops Require Adequate Friction to Maximize Spin Speed After Rising Upwards

From the above slow motion video clip, it is clear that the tippy top wants to (magically) raise its center of mass by lowering the stem and changing its spin axis in the process. But the surface prevents any further lowering of the stem as it makes contact with the stem. At this moment the mainly horizontal spinning tippy top starts rolling on the surface just before it launches itself upwards. This rolling requires some friction to ensure fast spin speed can be achieved before the top magically rises.

image.png

Thus, adequate friction is required for fast reverse spin speeds much like a ball rolling requires surface friction, otherwise it would just slide; while getting most of its reverse spinning speed from the actual non-friction related changing of the spin axis.

image.png

I believe this is the main reason why the tippy top and phi top rise upwards with slow final vertical spin speeds on low friction environments such as ice; and thus, fall back down quickly; after first magically rising and changing spin axis of course.

MES Note: Spencer ruins a great slow motion video by providing a mainstream (pseudo) science “explanation” that involves non-existent “angular momentum”, the (wrong) assumption of conservation of energy, and the usual magical non-existent “friction rising torque”.

image.png

Let the experiments speak for themselves instead of imposing unproven (and disproven) theory!

MES BOMBSHELL REALIZATION: Spinning Tops Tend to Rise Faster Than Similar Precessing Gyroscopes Because Rolling Generates Forced Forward Precession!

Notice how the tippy top jumps upwards very chaotically after the stems makes contact with the surface and starts to roll in the direction of precession. This forces the precession and thus magically generates lift as my earlier gyroscope demonstrations showcased.

image.png

At this stage, a tippy top is just a spinning top!

image.png

This is also the same as for Eric Laithwaite’s rolling forced precession gyroscope that shook his entire table setup!

image.png

Upside down version of a tippy top?

Thus, rolling is just another method of forced precession and similar to adding weight or directly forcing the precession either through a motor or manually twisting it as in Eric Laithwaite’s lift generation demonstration.

image.png

MES BOMBSHELL POTENTIAL DISCOVERY: Is a Non-Rolling Spinning Top Just a Gyroscope?

On a purely frictionless surface where no rolling would occur, would a spinning top behave the exact same as a similarly designed gyroscope?

Is a non-rolling spinning top just a gyroscope?

I think this might be the case; unless of course there are some aetheric field effects at the contact point between the surface and the spinning top stem that may be yet to be noticed.

Although I wouldn’t state definitively if this is the case, my experiment of a gyroscope on ice such that the outer casing and stem are spinning rapidly yet still rising in similar fashion had the casing not been spinning suggests that indeed a frictionless spinning top is a just a precessing gyroscope.

https://youtu.be/ddGRWfvYwZU

Retrieved: 17 May 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/kleDe

image.png

Tippy Top and Phi Top Experiments with a Magnetic Stirrer

The magnetic stirrer set up that I have involves spinning two reverse polarity magnets. The benefit of a magnetic stirrer is it allows for more controlled stationary spinning environments.

https://youtu.be/S-ISzfWLqHk

Retrieved: 15 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/1iwCl

image.png

Frozen Tippy Top on Ice Drops its Stem at Low Spin Speeds on Magnetic Stirrer

When a magnet moves or spins near aluminum metal, even though aluminum is not very magnetic, the magnetic field can magic-netically cause the aluminum to move or rotate. This effect is often deferred to some guy named “Lenz” and his so called “Law”.

The same frozen tippy top from my earlier experiments demonstrate that even at low controlled spin speeds with very little horizontal movements, the tippy top stem drops when on ice and using a magnetic stirrer to spin it.

https://youtu.be/vv_FzI2V9Mk

Retrieved: 13 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/ZfSGu

image.png

The tippy top is not able to flip over though as the spin speed is not able to get high enough before the stem makes contact with the ice surface, thus not able to generate the upwards launch needed to complete the flip. Nonetheless, this is further proof that “friction” is not why tippy tops want to magically increase their center of mass.

Amazing Phi Top Rising Demonstration on Magnetic Stirrer!

I had tried many experiments to get a controlled ice environment for the phi top on the magnetic stirrer, but it was very difficult to achieve this both because the phi top tends to move in a big precession circle relative to the tippy top. Thus, it was very difficult to keep the phi top in the center of the spinning magnets and keep it there long enough for the speed to built up high enough. You can see some of these struggles in my DRAFT #MESExperiments https://mes.fm/experiment-draft.

But a Phi Top spinning and rising on a smooth glass surface placed upon a magnetic stirrer is an astonishing sight to behold!

https://youtu.be/57hQb-Tco0o

Retrieved: 16 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/oJTTf

image.png

Absolutely magical rising!

“Physics Girl” Could’ve Saved Me Time by Just Using Wooden or Plastic Tops on Ice

While it was a great learning experience experimenting with different materials, temperatures, and spinning techniques, I initially did so simply to show that “Physics Girl” needs to change her YouTube channel name to “Fake-Physics Girl”. Had she just tested out simple wooden or plastic tippy tops and phi tops, she would realize that even on ice they magically rise upwards; hence throwing a wrench in her bogus “friction” theory that somehow causes a magical uniform upwards rising torque each and every spin.

https://youtu.be/khH-AngzMrQ

Retrieved: 16 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/2udgU

image.png

#NotFriction

https://youtu.be/5DRxbi8a8hU

Retrieved: 16 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/CGDAP

image.png

Fascinating stuff!

The Great Owen Liang Also Sees Past the Bogus “Friction” Excuse for Tippy Tops and Phi Tops

Let’s see what the great Owen Liang has to say about how phi tops and tippy tops rise magically upwards.

https://inverselaw.000webhostapp.com/video02.html

Retrieved: 10 May 2018
Archive: Not Available

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

Yup, excellent analysis as always from the great Owen Liang!

The Gyrocompass is the Embodiment of the Magical Properties of Gyroscopes

While my gyroscope and spinning top demonstrations showcased over-unity magical inertial lifting, propulsion, auto-adjusting balancing, and manipulating or “transferring” of mass, one concept that had been noticed throughout is that spin and precession direction tend to align. This is the essential property of gyroscopes behind one of its current applications as a “gyrocompass” or “gyro-compass”.

Gyroscope Spin and Precession Direction Tend to Align and Opposite of Vertical Force

Before I go over the gyrocompass, first recall that I had discussed this briefly in the earlier section on inertial lift and propulsion. Let’s take a look at this again for more experiments.

Spin and precession directions align against the added weight or force.

image.png

If the applied force is upwards, then precession is reversed while the gyro moves downwards to still align spin and precession directions.

image.png

Even Owen Liang’s Gyro Space Top demonstrates the same property of aligning spin and precession directions.

image.png

image.png

Even if the applied force is asymmetric, the top will move away from it to align against the “vector sum” of the net forces, while still aligning precession and spin directions.

image.png

image.png

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes with a Tilted Stem Will Rise Until Spin and Precession Directions are Aligned

This is the case even if the gyroscope stem was at a tilted position. It will rise upwards only to where the spin and precession directions align.

https://youtu.be/E5CWGbKIG6k

Retrieved: 20 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/B4uCD

image.png

image.png

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Gyroscopes with a Tilted Stem Hung by a String Can Rise from Negative Angles

In most of my gyroscope and spinning top experiments, I demonstrated that at an angle above the horizontal gyroscopes can rise upwards. But this is in fact true even for negative angles as long as the gyroscope is positioned such that spin and precession directions will align if the gyroscope were to rise.

https://youtu.be/jnss_kJnFeU

Retrieved: 20 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/DCeZm

image.png

image.png

Fascinating stuff!

Tippy Tops and Phi Tops Demonstrate Stable Spin and Precession Alignment at Higher Centers of Mass

In the earlier section, I showed that tippy tops and phi tops can rise upwards while changing their spin axis, and in the case of the tippy top, even if it were to completely flip upside down. Furthermore, they also exhibit “preferred” spin and precession alignments and towards a higher center of mass.

image.png

In both cases, spin and precession directions are not stable at fast spin speeds and low centers of mass. This is demonstrated by the tops rising fully upwards so that the center of mass is highest.

image.png

This is some absolutely fascinating rotational magic!

The Amazing and Underappreciated Gyrocompass

A gyrocompass is just a gyroscope that is forced to precess as the Earth rotates, thus (magically) aligning with Earth’s rotation and pointing North or South depending on the initial setup. To induce precession, several methods include adding weights or friction to the free gyroscope to hinder its preferred property of maintaining orientation during any movement.

MES Gimbaled Gyroscope Demonstrates the Mechanism of a Gyrocompass

The idea behind a gyrocompass is demonstrated in the following “gimbaled” gyroscope which precesses by tilting upwards or downwards whenever force is applied to turn the gimbaled setup; and again, the gyro spin directions want to line up with the applied global spin direction.

https://youtu.be/1kOL6qQf6I0

Retrieved: 18 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/abVpb

image.png

Turning the gimbals can even make the gyroscope do a complete 180 degree tilt to become upside down, just so the gyro spin direction aligns with the direction that the casing is being spun. During this tilting, or induced precession, there is significant resistance or inertia to turning.

image.png

This is a “stable” orientation in that rotating the casing in the direction of the gyro spin direction has no resistance to change, even when spun very fast.

Conversely, when rotating the casing in the opposite direction of the gyro spin direction, it is still possible to do so without inducing precession but only when the rotor is perfectly horizontal. This orientation is “unstable” in that any deviation from the perfectly horizontal orientation, which becomes very likely at higher turning speeds, can induce precession and thus the gyro wants to (magically) flip upside down in precession.

image.png

This is a particularly interesting feature of the gyrocompass which I will discuss further below.

Note also that when carrying the base and moving it around, the gyroscope wants to continue pointing in its initial position:

image.png

Likewise, the reverse is the case and applying a vertical force downwards will make the gyroscope precess in the direction that would align with spin direction.

image.png

Note that pushing downwards is “dynamic” in that it keeps changing relative to the tilt of the gyroscope so once the gyroscope flips over, a downwards applied force will cause the precession to reverse but nonetheless still want to align with spin direction.

image.png

Note the change in precession direction as the gyroscope flips over. Fascinating stuff!

A Gyrocompass is Just a Gyroscope that is Forced to Precess with Earth’s Rotation

Thus, a Gyrocompass is essentially a gyroscope that is forced to precess by adding a torque to it, such as my gimbal restricted movement setup, and then the gyro magically aligns spin direction with the global spin or torque direction, including the rotation of the Earth!

Amazing!

Super Precise and Durable Gyrocompasses are Used in Many Ships at Sea

Ships and planes use very precise near zero (rotational) frictionless gyrocompasses to determine True North; which is Earth’s tilt axis as opposed to the Magnetic Axis. Here are some good videos on the gyrocompasses used in WW2.

https://youtu.be/EM051IXJD9Q

Retrieved: 19 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/4rStS

image.png

This gyrocompass uses “compensator weights” to always keep the gyroscope perpendicular with gravity, as opposed to my gimbal setup that restricts movement of the gyroscope forcing it to precess when torque is applied. Thus, the gyro rotor precesses such that it wants to align with Earth’s rotation.

Note the “Phantom Element” which consists of a ring and an electronic turning mechanism that follows the turning of the gyro to keep the wire suspension from twisting up; which as my string experiments showed that even the slightest unwinding can generate induced (over-unity) torque to the gyro.

image.png

The above video doesn’t properly explain this, but the “compensator weights” are attached such that if the gyroscope tilts relative to the Earth, it has to lift the weights as well. This causes a state of “induced torque” and hence induced or forced precession as the Earth rotates and the compensator weights counteract the relative tilting of the gyroscope. And as with all induced torque, gyros want to align spin with precession direction. This is better demonstrated in the following (corrected) image.

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-gyrocompass-84972014.html

Retrieved: 17 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/GMidM

image.png

I believe this image has the direction of precession in the wrong direction since the gyrocompass wants to align spin and precession direction, and not counter it.

The above WW2 wire suspended gyrocompass is installed in an extremely robust outer chamber that is capable of withstanding even Hurricane conditions!

https://youtu.be/CNcDz1MDPE0?t=916

Retrieved: 18 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/PHktx

image.png

Absolutely Amazing! But sad to see that “War” aka Sanctioned Insanity is the driving force to behind some of the most amazing engineering feats.

Francis McCabe Demonstrates First Ever Mechanical Demonstration of “Inertia”

The late great Francis McCabe thought the Earth, atoms, and essentially all things function as gyroscopes; and the following demonstration is a great illustration that he may be right!

Gyroscopes want to align with overall or global or forced precession direction. But during the aligning they actively resist applied forces until they are fully in line. Francis demonstrates this by having multiple gyroscopes initially freely spinning, analogous to “atoms”, but when the torque is applied all the gyroscopes (or atoms) magically align with the torque direction; after which they stop resisting and spin freely. Essentially, he may have demonstrated the first ever mechanical or macro scale demonstration of what “inertia” may actually be.

https://youtu.be/vP4emXJ_GS0?t=2m23s

Retrieved: 3 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/Ia1dM

image.png

image.png

Notice how the gyroscopes resist the turning crank torque until they align with it and then move smoothly along.

image.png

We may literally be looking at the actual mechanism for the “innate resistance to change” known as inertia!

Balls Inside a Spinning Sphere Align with the Spin Direction

Francis’ mechanical demonstration of what “inertia” may very well be is very similar to an even simpler experiment. The following is just a toy involving a sphere with many little balls inside. Spinning the sphere makes all the balls pushed to the outside and spin in a ring in line with the direction that the sphere is spinning.

https://youtu.be/OUnlZnfxA6o

Retrieved: 23 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/OojqK

image.png

Notice how spinning turns the incoherent pile of balls into a coherent spinning disk due to the “centrifugal force”.

image.png

Fascinating!

This toy provides a major clue regarding the fundamental mechanism regarding “inertia”.

MES Preliminary Definition of “Inertia” Sheds Light on Its Mystery

From the entirety of the experiments and findings in this report, I believe the following preliminary definition of the phenomenon of inertia is a good starting point to help in understanding this mystery.

Preliminary Definition: Inertia is the interaction between coherent and incoherent processes and manifested as resistance.

Thus, in the case of Francis McCabe’s gyro inertia demonstration, the resistance experienced from the individual gyros to the external applied torque is coming from the individual gyros themselves that spin in any direction that is incoherent from the coherent applied torque. The more incoherency the more coherent force is required, and hence greater “inertia” or resistance is experienced.

This is the same for a car moving at a constant velocity; it requires extra energy to move it to a faster velocity but very little extra energy to maintain that higher speed.

Coherency in force or motion requires very little energy to maintain its current state.

This view of inertia may be key to understanding how a gyroscope can perform such baffling feats of strength since it is a good example of a highly coherent physical system which turns in a uniform and fast speed.

Are there some field effects occurring between coherent gyroscopic motion, gravity, and/or magnetism?

This image of the gyro in its risen state seems eerily plausible as to the true state of nature…

image.png

Quick Overview of Mainstream “Explanations” Regarding Gyroscopes and Objects in Rotation

I was originally going through a more “formal” mathematical elaboration on mainstream mechanical and rotational physics, but I believe it is best to postpone that to another video; if I even feel it is necessary to cover it at all. After all, mainstream physics can’t even explain how a basic spinning top rises.

Here is instead a quick rundown of big mainstream scientists either arrogantly making bogus fake assumptions regarding rotational physics or admitting how baffling it is.

Big Mainstream Science YouTube Channels Can’t Get Basic Rotational Physics Correct

Just because a YouTube channel presents itself as an authority on science or has a big audience, it is important to always think for yourself or else get lost in the crowd.

14+ Million Subscribers “Vsauce” Doesn’t Know Gyroscopes Can Rise Upwards

This video has more views than my entire channel as of today; I guess popularity doesn’t necessarily mean accurate physics.

https://youtu.be/XHGKIzCcVa0

Retrieved: 18 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/wtP7o

image.png

270+ Thousand Subscribers Steve Mould Doesn’t Know Gyroscopes Don’t Lose Spin Speed from Twisting

Maybe if Shell-sponsored Steve stares at the gyroscope long enough he will realize its spin speed is not affected from his twisting.

https://youtu.be/Q9qJbNmAf2s

Retrieved: 18 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/hQOuA

image.png

This is essentially the mainstream science narrative of all things: Assume “conservation of energy” and/or “friction” yet provide no concrete proof for either, nor define them in any concrete or testable terms.

455+ Thousand Subscribers “standupmaths” is Baffled by the Tippy Top

Well, I can’t blame him for not understanding clearly fake mainstream physics regarding tippy tops.

https://youtu.be/qMP7_IQpSN0?t=483

Retrieved: 26 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/w2Fk8

image.png

John Perry’s 1890 Book on Spinning Tops Understood Hurrying Precession is the Key to Rising of Spinning Tops

In the description of the above video, there is some screen shots to John Perry’s 1890 book that explains that a spinning top’s rolling acts to “hurry the precession” (i.e. forced precession) and thus (magically) rise.

https://imgur.com/a/sw0pc

Retrieved: 26 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/DplJP

image.png

image.png

Note the very interesting illustration regarding using your hand underneath a spinning top or precessing gyroscope to help the top rise backwards, presumably from hurrying the precession.

image.png

Supposedly this book is the earliest written illustration of a rising egg or Phi Top!

image.png

The full book is available in HTML and multiple other formats as well: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/34268

199+ Thousand Subscribers Walter Lewin Cautions Students About the Most Difficult Concept of All: Gyroscopes and Torque

Even the famous Walter Lewin, whom is among one of the best (mainstream) professors, cautions students about the perilous road of (bogus fake overly difficult mainstream physics regarding) gyroscopes.

https://youtu.be/sNaaL19opxw

Retrieved: 17 April 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/Rfzqc

image.png

image.png

Once again, we are talking about the physics of a simple spinning object.

https://youtu.be/XPUuF_dECVI?t=14m6s

Retrieved: 17 April 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/nNrW7

image.png

image.png

image.png

5+ Million Subscribers “Veritasium” Can’t Find a Physicist That Can Explain a Spinning Disk

Does anyone know anything about anything?!

https://youtu.be/tDr26U49_VA

Retrieved: 27 April 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/XNKjJ

image.png

Note that the spinning disk is a similar toy to a tippy top in that it tends to spin heavy side up.

image.png

I stated “tends” because apparently it can go both ways when spun on ice.

image.png

Interestingly, he mentions that spinning the disk above the ground with the hole upwards still makes it want to move the hole downwards even in air?!

image.png

Mainstream Science Websites Baffled by Objects in Rotation

The world’s biggest mystery is a spinning top in your hand.

“American Scientist” Doesn’t Know how Gyroscopes Work or What Inertia Is

The illusion of “advanced” modern technology covers up the fact that mainstream physics doesn’t know how the most basic, and hence anything that follows, works.

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+AmericanscientistOrg/posts/THAUYyjcCBX

Retrieved: 2 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/kp8nU

image.png

Centrifugal and centripetal force, rotation, inertia, and inertial vs non-inertial reference frames are at the heart of understanding the universe.

https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-forgotten-mystery-of-inertia

Retrieved: 2 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/vgbTJ

image.png

As always, the comment section provides the best insight:

image.png

The Most Difficult Concept in Physics: Spinning Tops

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/08/26/this-is-the-hardest-concept-to-grasp-in-physics-hint-its-not-relativity/#28cf62d95e78

Retrieved: 16 April 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/98m38

image.png

A famous Harvard physics professor (Ed Purcell maybe?) said that undergraduate physics students come in expecting that the hardest thing they'll have to learn will be either relativity or quantum mechanics. Actually, those are the most novel topics (i.e., the ones involving notions that are the most surprising from our ordinary, common-sense perspective). The hardest thing that an undergraduate physics students must learn is the classical dynamics of spinning tops (also called "rigid bodies" in this context).

The great theoretical physicist James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879), discoverer of the laws of electrodynamics, wrote, "To those who study the progress of exact science, the common spinning-top is a symbol of the labours and the perplexities of men."

MES Quote: The perplexities of men cover up the simplicity of spinning top.

Most physicists are content to compute observable quantities, leaving the interpretation to the philosophers, an attitude captured in a famous dictum often wrongly attributed to Richard Feynman, to "shut up and calculate;" see N. D. Mermin, "Could Feynman have said this?", Physics Today 57, 10 (2004).

Historical “Scientists” Baffled at Simple Tops

Even “Noble” prize winners are baffled by the basic mechanics of rotation.

https://io9.gizmodo.com/5689842/why-the-humble-tippe-top-baffled-physicists-and-statesmen

Retrieved: 16 April 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/1VyMd

image.png

This question absorbed several brilliant and famous minds. Niels Bohr, who helped figure out the structure of the atom, and Wolfgang Pauli, best known for the Pauli Exclusion Principle, both famously studied the tippe top to figure out what made it flip itself.

image.png
(Pictured Left: Wolfgang Pauli and Niels Bohr doing what Nobel Prize winners do with their spare time.)

Bicycles Are Still a Mystery to Mainstream Science

You can’t make this stuff up, folks.

http://bicycle.tudelft.nl/schwab/Bicycle/

Retrieved: 19 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/0WffP

image.png

“Even now, after we’ve been building them for 100 years, it’s very difficult to understand just why a bicycle works - it’s even difficult to formulate it as a mathematical problem.” — Freeman Dyson interviewed by Stewart Brand in Wired News, February 1998.

Does anyone know anything?!

http://www.phys.lsu.edu/faculty/gonzalez/Teaching/Phys7221/vol59no9p51_56.pdf

Retrieved: 18 March 2019
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20190318183524/http://www.phys.lsu.edu/faculty/gonzalez/Teaching/Phys7221/vol59no9p51_56.pdf

image.png

https://www.fastcompany.com/3062239/the-bicycle-is-still-a-scientific-mystery-heres-why

Retrieved: 17 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/vPJe7

image.png

A bicycle is surprisingly stable for an upright, two-wheeled vehicle that needs to be propped against a wall when it’s not moving. But perhaps a bigger surprise is that no consensus exists on why the bike is as stable as it is. For such a simple design, which almost anyone can understand, this seems crazy. After all, we live in a world of self-driving cars and safe passenger airplanes. Surely the bike can’t still hold any physics or engineering mysteries?

At the heart of the puzzle is something we’ve all observed. If you push a riderless bicycle, it balances itself, steering automatically to correct for any wobbles, until it slows down and finally falls flat on its side.

So, just how does a bike stay up by itself? It’s still a mystery…

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-bicycle-problem-that-nearly-broke-mathematics/

Retrieved: 17 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/0e9PX

image.png

“Everybody knows how to ride a bike, but nobody knows how we ride bikes,” says Mont Hubbard, an engineer who studies sports mechanics at the University of California, Davis.

The link between leaning and steering gives rise to the bicycle's most curious feature: the way that it can balance while coasting on its own. Give a riderless bike a shove and it may wend and wobble, but it will usually recover its forward trajectory.

He applied the team's insights about bicycles to a new arena: robots. If bicycles could demonstrate such elegant stability without a control system, he reasoned, it might be possible to design a stripped-down walking machine that achieves the same thing.

It also introduced a puzzle: the steering torque required was two or three times that predicted by the Whipple bicycle model. This might have been caused by friction and flexing of the tyres, which are not part of the model, but no one is certain. For further tests, Moore and his colleagues have built a robotic bike that can balance itself. “Once you have a robot bicycle, you can do a lot of crazy experiments without having to put a human in danger,” he says. (One of his earlier handling experiments had him regaining his balance after a sideways blow from a wooden stick.) Unlike many other riderless-bike robots, it does not use internal gyroscopes to stay upright, but depends on steering alone. Moore has shipped it to Schwab for further study.

Self-riding robot bikes without any internal gyroscopes or electronic sensors?! Sounds a lot like Owen Liang’s self-balancing spinning top robot! And is that an allusion to torque over-unity?!


View All Parts

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept
Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2
Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3
Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4

Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5

Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7

Full #AntiGravity Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!