☝#AntiGravity Part 6: Objects in Rotation Defy ‘Mainstream’ Physics + MES Duality Concept (Notes 3)

in antigravity •  5 months ago  (edited)

Video 1

Video 2

Due to YouTube video length restrictions, Part 6 is split into two videos. The sections in the first video are shown below with their accompanying times in the video.

(1) @ 1:34 - Important Links and Notes
(2) @ 5:45 - Introduction
(3) @ 8:37 - Table of Contents
(4) @ 55:56 - #MESExperiments Science Experiments Video Series
(5) @ 58:08 - General Notes on Scientific Exploration
(6) @ 1:06:01 - Clearing Eric Laithwaite’s Name
(7) @ 2:25:11 - Eric Laithwaite’s Unconventional Interpretation of Newtonian Mechanics
(8) @ 3:06:30 - Cambridge University’s Bogus Fake Science and Coverup of Gyro Magic
(9) @ 4:04:00 - TOP SECRET: The Movie Inception and Spinning Tops
(10) @ 4:07:06 - Overview of Conventional Physics Regarding Spinning Tops, Gyroscopes, and Objects in Rotation
(11) @ 4:52:03 - Overview of Newton’s Laws and Einstein’s Relativity
(12) @ 5:28:39 - Owen Liang’s Gyro Space Top Proves Spin Angular Momentum is an Illusion
(13) @ 7:06:33 - INCEPTION IS REAL: Are We Living in a Dream?
(14) @ 7:07:36 - Exploring Owen Liang’s Many Unnecessary Accounts
(15) @ 9:00:10 - Owen Liang’s Battle with Wikipedia
(16) @ 9:19:47 - Francis McCabe and Gyro 1000X+ Torque Over Unity!

The following sections are shown in the second video.

(17) @ 0:00 - Inertial Propulsion and Inertial Lift are Facts of Life
(18) @ 52:58 - Tippy Tops and Phi Tops Demonstrate Rising with Spin Axis Change
(19) @ 1:54:32 - The Amazing and Underappreciated Gyrocompass
(20) @ 2:50:48 - The Concept of Inertia and Coherency
(21) @ 3:03:39 - Overview of Mainstream Clueless Science Regarding Gyroscopes and Objects in Rotation
(22) @ 3:45:51 - SUMMARY OF MY SELF-APPOINTED PHD
(23) @ 5:10:57 - MES DUALITY BREAKTHROUGH CONCEPT
(24) @ 5:53:35 - AREAS OF FURTHER RESEARCH
(25) @ 7:37:52 - Exploring the True Nature of Gravity, Mass, Magnetism, Electricity, Light, and Reality
(26) @ 7:48:05 - David LaPoint’s Primer Fields, the Ferrocell, and Ken Wheeler’s Magnetism
(27) @ 10:29:19 - THE TO KEY GYROSCOPIC MAGIC IS ‘COUNTERSPACE’
(28) @ 11:05:58- True Magnetism and the Interconnectedness of All Things

Stay tuned for #AntiGravity Part 7!


Watch Video On:

Download my PhD:

Full #AntiGravity Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


View PhD Below

View All Parts

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept

Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2

Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3
Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4
Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5
Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7


#AntiGravity Part 6 Objects in Rotation Defy Physics Zoomed 2.jpeg

New Owen Liang Online Accounts I Recently Discovered!

The only bigger mystery than spinning tops, is Owen Liang. Instead of building up a single website or online account to make it easy to promote his monumental discovery into the public consciousness, he instead unintentionally obscures it by creating many separate and repetitive online accounts.

Here are the new accounts that I discovered halfway through researching for this video.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkkSIDQANVvesZ2SzpiOXOQ/videos?sort=dd&shelf_id=0&view=0

Retrieved: 16 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/CUquG

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRCQ8XpP49K70L7rEkb15Og/videos?view=0&shelf_id=0&sort=dd

Retrieved: 16 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/U4Sys

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC43Ly2McxnEwz92cwyxYMpw/videos

Retrieved: 16 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/vUaWk

https://www.ebay.com/itm/space-top-alien-spinning-top-playable-at-any-directions-/171995933588?_trksid=p2047675.l2557&ssPageName=STRK%3AMESELX%3AIT&nma=true&si=WpWyHSVI4MDKMaellNBBdnllYe8%253D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/MqvQH

https://www.ebay.com/usr/gyrotop

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/Vc0Oe

Owen Liang's Kickstarter and the Man Behind the Legend

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419602554/space-top-a-new-cousin-of-spinning-top-not-a-gyros

Retrieved: 19 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/5sdLs

https://www.kickstarter.com/profile/419602554/about

Retrieved: 19 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/PMw7X

Owen Liang with as inspirational a biography as it gets! Now he is working full time on his game-changing gyro space top!

The triumph of the individual over the collective.

https://www.kickstarter.com/profile/419602554/created

Retrieved: 19 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/7c3fo

Literally he has 5 Kickstarter campaigns, and all of which has been cancelled or not met the goal. Maybe if he stopped making multiple accounts for multiple websites and made more of a focused effort, he maybe could’ve attracted more open-minded investors. Fortunately, MES discovered his work…

Owen Liang Has Written Two Top Secret E-Books!

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1?ie=UTF8&text=Owen+Liang&search-alias=digital-text&field-author=Owen+Liang&sort=relevancerank

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/4eHTV

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B017ZZ57EG/ref=oh_aui_d_detailpage_o00_?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/CM04r

Such an epic review!

https://www.amazon.com/Top-Secret-Spinning-fundamental-discovery-ebook/dp/B017ZZZBMY/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1545037721&sr=1-1

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/VyoB9

This guy is on fire with these epic reviews!

Owen's New and Improved Website!

https://sites.google.com/view/law-of-inverse

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/43Wfy

Owen Liang’s Patent Finally Got Approved!

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=10,099,151&OS=10,099,151&RS=10,099,151

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/qYIKA

http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=10099151&IDKey=65804FA60592&HomeUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO2%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526co1%3DAND%2526d%3DPTXT%2526s1%3D10%2C099%2C151%2526OS%3D10%2C099%2C151%2526RS%3D10%2C099%2C151

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: Not Available
Alternate URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R3uBsntNx2POAWsvlHyHDCsr_83z2no0/view
My Backup Link: https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIh7BOAfLPpG79S7YUXA

Very interesting. He applied on 29 May 2014, Application got published on 3 December 2015, and Patent Granted on 16 October 2018, just a few months ago!

Patent Application

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20150343318A1/en?oq=20150343318

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/cBgxC

Patent Granted

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10099151B2/en?oq=20150343318

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/JPW6b

Highlights from His Newly Discovered Channels

I wanted to group together here many of the interesting highlights from Owen Liang’s random and unnecessary amount of new internet accounts.

Spinning Top Based Self-Balancing One-Wheeled Robot

Owen Liang utilizes spinning tops magical ability to auto-magically balance by creating a one-wheeled self-balancing robot!

https://youtu.be/9FKpCPL-A9w

Retrieved: 16 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/CBHqk

Amazing!

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Spinning Tops Can Rise and Lift Much Greater Than Their Own Weight and at an Increased Rising Rate!

Owen Liang’s Inverse Law and one-wheeled robot means that spinning tops could still rise even if a lot of weight were added to it…

https://youtu.be/Ad7omOeeSaY

Retrieved: 11 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/nNFq0

130% lifting strength by spinning tops. And the quickness by which the top rises is amazing!

What’s more fascinating is that removing the heavy battery pack greatly lowers the rising rate and in fact could take several minutes to rise for this particular fast spinning top. This is as mind-boggling as it gets!

Adding weight = rising faster.
Removing weight = rising slower.

And as shown earlier, the opposite is true too: adding counterweight = dropping.

If you want to make gyros rise, try to make them drop; and vice versa. #InvertedGyroWorld

Bogus YouTube Comment Section “Critics” Not Thinking Clearly

Here is an example of the type of “critics” that repeat unthinking mainstream talking points whenever people dare challenge scientific orthodoxy.

https://youtu.be/F5jryfmiW2s

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/QHqMH

What in the world is this clown talking about?!

"Gravity has nothing to do with a top staying up"…. Except that it causes a "torque" that causes the spinning top to rise? Do people even think about what they are stating? Magnetism has a “stabilization force” but gravity doesn’t? This “stabilization force” knows to always magically align the spinning top in direct opposition to it, even with an asymmetric magnetic field or with a hybrid of gravity and magnetism?

A gyroscope on a string doesn’t try to stand up?... Really? ;)

The only good thing this person said was mention John Hartman, which is another unique inventor. I recommend checking out his “Square Gyro” demonstration on YouTube! I will look to go over it in later videos.

Seriously, such arrogant (and ignorant) dismissive comments by the "scientifically literate" has kept humanity more in the dark than any "New World Order Secret Society Conspiracy" ever did or ever could.

Precessing Gyroscopes Rise Even When Hung on a String

It is comments as the one above that shake my being to the core. How can someone so sure of themselves be so wrong? How?!

https://youtu.be/HLGKe8Q2Tu8

Retrieved: 28 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/3Tavy

People have to finally accept the impossible: Spinning is “Anti-Gravitic”.

Also note that near the end, I show that by applying a spin counter to the gyro spin direction generates inertial lift.

When applying a spin in the same direction as the gyro spin, the tendency to maintain orientation is enhanced even as the gyro is thrown outwards but still maintains the same orientation.

Interestingly, even the unwinding of the string in the opposite direction of the gyro spin can generate slight tilting or inertial lift!

When the string unwinds in the same direction of the gyro spin, lift isn’t generated but the gyro becomes more fixed in its orientation.

The tendency for a gyroscope to align its rotor spin direction with the direction of precision or applied spin is the basic mechanism behind a “gyrocompass” which I will discuss further in this video.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Replicating the Rising Gyro on String Experiment with a Counterweight Makes it Drop!

As always in the upside-down world of gyroscopes, the opposite of what is expected happens. In the exact same experiment as above, in which a precessing gyroscope hung by a string rises, adding a counterweight or counter-torque that should assist the gyro in rising makes it lose its magical rising ability.

https://youtu.be/Pj-C-IkBSQk

Retrieved: 11 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/7IbQL

So yes, even gyros hung by a string can rise upwards... or downwards!

MES Note: This is similar to my earlier demonstration of a gyroscope with counterweight magically dropping that should otherwise make it level. The main difference is that in the above experiment the weight distribution is such that the gyroscope wants to drop beyond just level position.

Note that the precession is reversed relative to the above two string experiments.

Bogus “Critic” Returns

The same clueless over-confident “critic” returns, and this time tries to downplay the amazing ability of gyroscopes to magically rise all on their own.

https://youtu.be/qXwO7CY17KQ

Retrieved: 17 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/61KXf

Notice how steep Owen Liang’s son (I presume) starts the gyroscope off at and then it magically rises in a spiraling upwards precession very quickly. This was actually the first demonstration of a rising gyro in precession that I had seen, but initially I just assumed it was the same as a spinning top so I had not thought to see if it can spiral upwards without sliding/rolling across the surface like in my gyro rising experiments.

As much as I loath reading arrogant over-confident ignorance, I have to present it because the mindset of a person governs whether they give a few incoherent sentences regarding phenomena they have no clue about, or spending countless hours writing a self-appointed PhD rewriting all of conventional physics.

Fundamentally, the only difference in people is their awareness, or lack thereof.

“Moment of torque”, “translated by precession”, “90 degrees into the rotation”, “creates a spiral” that magically raises the gyroscope… LOL

So much “cutting corners” in Whipartist’s “logic”, so little time…

Instead of blindly defending the authority of mainstream physics, Whipartist could have taken the time to realize that even his “explanation” is nowhere to be found in all of Wikipedia or even any University in the world…

Owen Liang Still Won’t Respond to Me About Purchasing a Billion Gyro Space Tops!

I have tried contacting Owen Liang multiple times, even trying to buy his Gyro Top, but to no avail…

https://youtu.be/CMCyW_efYRU

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/vNxw8

Automated Electric Gyro Space Top

Owen Liang made an automated electric air blower to keep his Gyro Space Top continuously spinning! And in true Owen Liang fashion, he includes his deep philosophy.

https://youtu.be/0qCNAUXsPhM

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/rgIHh

A truly great test to get mainstream "explanations" for everything, and not just top secret spinning top's secret: Ask “experts” and compare answers with other “experts”; and then ultimately compare with what you think; in other words, think logically about all things.

The reason Owen Liang was the one to uncover such a simple yet monumental discovery, is because he was seeing the world for what it was, rather than being blindfolded by pre-existing theories.

The spinning top represents a philosophical shift in our understanding of the nature of reality.

Highlights from Owen’s Kickstarter Campaigns

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419602554/inverting-top-is-true-spinning-top-playable-at-any#

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/HH1wK

About

The natural law unknown to our science yet.

Demonstrating this invention to as many experts in physics as possible; if they could explain the inverting top with known laws of physics. The backer is entitled to receive a full refund & keep the inverting top.

The design of this invention is very simple, just playing the spinning top with attractive magnetic force, but nobody was stupid enough to make it first because the idea is against the law of physics. By pure luck, project creator noticed the flaw in our science, and then test his personal spinning top theory with this invention. The outcome of his test proves there is a mistake in our science regarding spinning top physics, and the existent of a special law unknown to our science yet. The law for spinning top is not just another natural law; it is a kind of law able to make nonliving entity smart. The first of the kind in our science history. Due to the law converting nonliving matter or dead material into smartness by just a simple spinning energy, this discovery would eventual effect the way of our thinking and take the philosophy into a new level of controversy.

Project creator is looking for experts to explain the invention of inverting top. If it is unexplained, there should be a science mistake or missing link in physics. The goal for project creator is correcting historical mistake or present the missing link to the right places. Therefore, sharing this project to others is most efficient way of helping the project. If you are the bakers, playing of inverting top should be shared with as many people as possible rather than playing on you own. So far, only U.S. patent office has admitted the invention is unexplainable. However, no expert wants to do the same admitting probably due to the feeling of embarrassing to do so.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419602554/spacetop-revealing-a-science-mystery-for-high-scho

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/8wuKq

Playing space top is having fun with a science law not known to our civilization yet. Space top is here to spark our curiosity; specially for young mind.

Anyone able to correctly explain the space top with known laws of physics would be smartest person in this planet. No expert could do it so far, and the inventor of the space top is only able to interpret it with his own personal science theory, which is a potential discovery so far.

Space top is not a magic or hoax; it is a mystery in science. Public help would reduce the time required for solving the mystery.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419602554/top-secret-of-spinning-every-science-lover-needs-t

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/FTE6C

We finally find out why spinning top has the name of "spinning top" , top in here means the top secret. The name is the abbreviation of spinning top secret.

MES Note: Yup, it is all in the name.


Both of them real, but no expert believes the right true so far. Your support would make the change.

The primary goal ($888 US D) : Getting E-book published .

The first stretch goal ($2,888 US D) : Making printed book available.

The second stretch goal ($6,888 US D) : Hardcover edition.

The next stretch goal would be the children book of space top due to new generations are much better learning correct science before exposing outdated knowledge from school. The cost for making children book is not clear at this moment.

Risks and challenges

The manuscript of this book has been finished. The next two steps are finding professional editing services and publisher for finishing up the eBook. Regarding printing book, the author does not know much about it. it should not hard or take much more time for transforming the eBook to printing book. Anyhow, every printing book backer would receive the eBook also, meaning no risk to learning top secret on time.

Owen Liang truly understood just how monumental his finding is and was trying to spread the knowledge as best as he could, and thus I am following in his footsteps.

Highschool Teacher Baffled by the Anti-Gravity Space Top

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419602554/space-spinning-top

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/36i1D

MES Note: A high-school teacher states the obvious: the (automated) gyro-space top defies gravity!

Kickstarter “Critics” Repeating Typical Unthinking Appeal-to-Authority Talking Points

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419602554/space-spinning-top/comments?comment=UHJvamVjdENvbW1lbnQtNjg0NDM2Mw%3D%3D

Retrieved: 1 January 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/dxIkb

As is typical in all of life, people defer to “authority” such as to “professors” instead of actually speaking for themselves: How would you know if a “professor” is correct if you don’t even know the topic?

“Athavan”, whom is a Kickstarter “Superbacker”, displays the typical robotic reactionary responses plaguing humanity and without even having a clue as to what Liang's invention is claiming. He also assumes that someone would cluelessly go out of their way to make a campaign to get funding for a device that can be seen with a quick internet search.

And little does Athavan realize, but even Bicycles are a complete mystery to mainstream “scientists”, as will be covered later in this video. Bikes can balance on a treadmill at low speeds without even a rider on it, interestingly displaying much the same auto-balancing magic of spinning tops and rising gyroscopes.

Also, note the theme of Owen having trouble getting his game-changing invention published, especially on Wikipedia which I will cover shortly.

Highlights from his New Google Site

https://sites.google.com/view/law-of-inverse

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/TLkRQ

The law of inverse is a very novel approach to interpret how spinning top works. Since the personal law has been very successfully predicting several new phenomenons for spinning top, it is very necessary to share the novel ideas and predictions to the public or science community. This novel ideas is here to challenge the well established knowledge about spinning top physics, and the author is desperate waiting for experts to take or response the challenge. The readers who does not have enough knowledge in physic could still help by sharing this web pages or Google site directly or indirectly to the experts in physics. The author has been trying to present to matter to experts for many years, so far none of them want to address the issue. The discovery claim is solidly supported by the invention with U.S.Patent No. 10,099,151 or in PDF, which is looks likes a 100% hoax to anyone who has enough knowledge in physics. The discovery was very simple, but it is very unexpected, and nobody is expected the unexpected. For quick view of the invention, use the link or click "inverting top" or "4-category of top"

If you are a researcher in physics, there is chance for the novel theory able to benefit your work. Spinning top physics is a fundamental science, and modern physics was build on the foundation. If a A flaw in the foundation, it should have negative effect on the mordant physics or prevent something from being discovered. There should be more high level physics missing link relating to basic missing link in spinning top physics.

Owen is right: if the mainstream physics of a spinning top is flawed, so too is all modern physics since they depend on the foundation that is a spinning mass, or “inertia” in general.

Owen Liang References My #MESExperiments Part 1 Video of Rising Gyros!

https://sites.google.com/view/law-of-inverse/inverse-law

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/yGxhN

The self rising phenomenon have been one of biggest puzzle for physics experts because it against the law of angular momentum. Some excuses have been used for explanation of spinning top defying the law, but none of them has good experimental support for the excuse. The novel law of inverse offer a perfect and simple explanation for self rising phenomenon. The word “simple” in here means that anybody with high school physics level should be able to understand how spinning top is able to defy the law of angular momentum.


Fig. 12 are snap shot from video Gyroscopes Precess UPWARDS on Low Friction & Rotating Surfaces or link: https://youtu.be/mPCZbJHWZB0 Fig. 10a is the shot from time 4:52 and Fig. 10b is from time 6:41. The name for this device is gyroscope, actually it works as a spinning top because the single contact point. It takes 49 second to change from tilt to upright.

Amazing!

https://youtu.be/mPCZbJHWZB0

Owen’s Updated Theory of Opposition and the Liang Force

Owen has a more recent theory to explain his #InverseLaw finding, and which he uses “Liang Forces” to indicate there may be offset horizontal forces, thus an “upwards torque”.

https://sites.google.com/view/law-of-inverse/novel-theory?authuser=0

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/b0WDN

About 10 years ago, author feel the frictions explanation is not logic enough to interpret the self rising, the strong curiosity keep him to think about a better idea to solve the problem.. Not sure how many weeks later, one fantasy idea pops up. How about make one pair of centrifugal force horizontally rather than orthogonal to spinning axis as shown in Fig. 26d or Fig. 26f. Even Though this idea breaks the orthogonal rule (or maybe law) between spinning axis and centrifugal force, it works perfectly to explain self rising phenomenon.. The obvious advantage for horizontally centrifugal force (Liang Force) is not cancelling each other out to zero. As mentioned earlier, One pair of Orthogonal centrifugal force always cancel each other out to zero because they are at opposite in direction co-axially. No net force left for helping self rising work. If spinning top plays at tilting position, horizontal centrifugal forces (Liang Force) would never co-axially to each other, so there could be some kind of force left responsible the work of self rising. If spinning top tilting toward right, the Liang force is good for turn top toward left in Fig. 26f; when spinning top tilting toward left, Liang force favor toward right Fig. 26d.

I had originally entertained this theory and thought maybe the precession itself was causing an “imbalance” of precessional centripetal/centrifugal force or precessional angular momentum of the tilted wheel. But my earlier demonstration of the gyroscope dropping when a counterweight is added suggests that the very concept of “forces” and “torque” needs to be re-examined.

More Highlights from his New Site

https://sites.google.com/view/law-of-inverse/inverting-top

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/PU2Fp

We have used to the wrong rules or law that spinning top only balance at upright direction. The invention of inverting top demonstrate top able to balance at any direction. With wrong physics law for spinning top, experts would think the inverting top a hoax or impossible. Without know enough physics, average people see nothing wrong with invention of inverting top..

The author has been trying to share the video recording of inverting top to public through YouTube and then receive very negative respond because the inverting top looks like 100% hoax to anyone who has enough knowledge in physics. This is the reason for author to apply U.S. Patent for the invention to make inverting top more much more credible than it looks. The patent # serves as a searchable trusted public documents for convincing experts to realize the historical science mistake or a missing link. Unsurprisingly, the patent examiners was doubt on the invention also and did search on the matter and conclusions the inverting top is defying the know natural law. In order for the patent applications to be continued, a prototype of inverting top need to be sent to patent office to make sure the invention really works in reality.

Conventional observation is far from enough to claim the law of inverse. The experimental design below deliver a very novel and strong spinning phenomenon to support the law of inverse. The name for the experiment device is inverting top, which look like a hoax. To convince the expert the inverting top being a reality, the inverting top have made available in online stores: Amazon and eBay. But still the inverting top is too fantasy to be science. It took fours years for this invention to get u.s. Patent number, which be convincing enough for some experts to believe the invention being real. If it is real, it means a mistake in our science because know against the invention. This is the reason nobody want to invent it until now.

Physic expert not only have to expect the unexpected, but also have to accept the unexpected simply because it is already a reality.

For those who still not convinced, they are welcome contact u.s. Patent office reporting patent # could not be real because it is against the know law of physics. However before doing so, it is recommended to order a inverting top from eBay or a ozone first to make sure it is not real. Otherwise you would definitely insulting or embarrassed yourself at the end .

Patent No. 10,099,151

https://sites.google.com/view/law-of-inverse/get-involved

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/VnGx9

Any natural phenomenon unexplained by our known science should be considered as top secret science because it is nature's secret beyond our ability to understanding the nature. However, this google site is not is not about the science in our advance science or research area. The top secret science in here is about the science at high school level; more specifically it is about high school physics mistake in our textbook. all the physics textbook in the world have the same mistakes. it is almost impossible to make reader to understand the mistake until reader watch a invention plays in the following video link.

Any natural phenomenon unexplained by our known science should be considered as top secret science

Think about that: every single textbook in the world doesn’t know how a spinning top behaves.

Highlights from his Patent

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10099151B2/en?oq=20150343318

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/I0eds

(1) Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a spinning top assembly, particularly relates to a spin axis controllable spinning top assembly capable of changing spinning orientation thereof under proper control to defy gravity when spinning at any orientation thereof. Especially, a spinning top assembly in accordance with the present invention is capable of continuing changing orientation of a defined spin axis thereof under proper control when an orientation thereof varies from a regular horizontal spinning orientation during spinning of the spinning top assembly as desired.

MES Note: Literally Owen's patent states his spinning top defies gravity!

  1. The Related Arts

A rotation axis or spin axis is an imaginary line around which a three-dimensional object rotates or spins. Every rotating object such as a motor, wheel, gyroscope, or spinning top must have a defined rotation axis. To hold the rotation axis of a rotating object at desirable orientation, it requires least two anchored points along the rotation axis. Almost all manmade rotating objects are able to satisfy these two simple requirements except a spinning top. Two bearings on each side of a rotor are the anchored points for a rotating object such as an electrical motor or gyroscope. Positions of these two bearings dictate the orientation of the rotors. In contracting, a spinning top only has one contacting point or a single solid anchored point, manipulating orientation of its spin axis was never possible in any past prior arts. The spinning top could not have more than one solid contacting point to be function as spinning top. This uncontrollable spin axis of the spinning top does not mean its rotation axis acts randomly. For some reason, the spin axis of the spinning top always wants to go a vertical orientation no matter where its starting orientation is. The spinning top moves from its tiled position to an upright position by precession or wobbling. In another word, the spinning top could not hold still at any tilted position; it will become precession until reach the upright position.

The main structural difference between a gyroscope and spinning top is the number of the supporting points for their spinning shafts or spin axis. Spinning tops have only one supporting point while a gyroscope has two supporting points. Therefore the orientation of a gyroscope is decided by the locations of the two supporting points. Obviously, the orientation of a spinning top is uncontrollable due to there is only one supporting point. There is no second supporting point to confine the spinning axis of the spinning top.

Unlike a gyroscope, the spinning top is only limited to play at its upright or vertical orientation. Any external force for changing its vertical orientation would cause the spinning top starting precession. The purpose of this procession of the spinning top is to move back to the vertical position again. In another word, the spinning top could not hold stable at any tilt position. Natural limitation of a spinning top is restricted to such upright orientation. To break such limitation of the spinning top and to stabilize the spinning top at any orientation thereof becomes a main issue to be addressed.

Especially, according to a personal explanation theory created by the inventor of the present invention, the spinning top deals with two kinds of forces, a falling force and a standing force. Spinning of the spinning top creates the standing force which is always opposite to the falling force. In all previous arts, since the falling force is the gravity all the time, the direction of standing force, which is opposite to the gravity, always goes up. As a result, no other direction for the standing force is considered to be possible.

Hence, based on a new spinning top theory of the inventor of the present invention, a novel design or method to confine orientations of a spinning top at any directions as desired is considered and provided in the present invention as described hereinafter.

Owen Liang literally has a patent approved by the US Patent office that states his Gyro Space Top defies gravity and the physics of how it works is based on his own theory, since there is no conventional physics theory that could explain such simple gyro magic.

Highlights from his Top Secret Books

Here are some highlights from his two Top Secret books.

New Theoretical Top: Flying Tops

Owen Liang expands on his Inverse Law and suggests other ways to test out spinning top behavior. One such way is a basic spinning top while flying on a plane. The top should always align perfectly against the direction of gravity.

This is from Owen’s first Top Secret book.

https://www.amazon.com/Top-Secret-Spinning-fundamental-discovery-ebook/dp/B017ZZ57EG/ref=sr_1_2?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1545295721&sr=1-2

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/JDEF0

Notice that if the plane were to fly perfectly straight, the spinning top would appear tilted to the passengers on board! I will definitely be bringing a spinning top on my next flight.

New Theoretical Top: Astroid Turning Top

Just as with Einstein’s theory of general relativity, a rotating/accelerating surface such as a rotating asteroid mimics gravity and thus should allow spinning tops to also magically align with the rotation.

Spiral Precession is True Precession, NOT Circular Precession

Owen Liang was the first person that I had seen to correct the bogus fake physics that “spinning tops precess in a constant circular motion”. Has anyone actually spun a spinning top? What fake reality or dream world are these “physicists” living in?

When I first looked at the mainstream "explanation" for, in particular gyroscopes, I literally believed that they only precessed like this instead of spiraling upwards; and this was because I couldn’t logically think that mainstream physics could get something so incredibly basic so incredibly wrong. It wasn’t until I videotaped my gyro experiments, and when I reviewed the film at a sped-up playback speed I noticed that the gyro rose a very tiny bit. This ultimately led me to my game-changing MES Experiments video series!

Seriously, the people that draw up these completely incomplete "circular precession" nonsense should be ashamed of themselves.

“Angular Momentum” Can’t Explain the Gyro Space Top

The pseudo-science “angular momentum” can’t explain how spinning tops rise and much less how the gyro space top magically moves away from the stronger magnetic disk as the base is being tilted.

Yup, this was the first thought I had when I saw the Gyro Space Top. How is the spinning top moving away from magnetic base?! Now think of what happens when the spin speed is much greater, i.e. high "angular momentum", yet the result should still be the same, which is the gyro self-corrects with complete disregard for this mystical non-existent "angular momentum".

No Upwards Force Can Be Found to Explain How a Spinning Top Rises

Owen Liang has a good analogy on how “centrifugal force” is pulling the spinning top on both sides thus canceling each other out. Note that even Owen doesn’t know that the precession of spinning tops moves with zero centrifugal force.

This is from Owen Liang’s second Top Secret Book

https://www.amazon.com/Top-Secret-Spinning-fundamental-discovery-ebook/dp/B017ZZZBMY

Retrieved: 20 December 2018
Archive: http://archive.fo/8r6hA

Theoretical “Liang Forces” or Horizontal Centrifugal Forces that Create Upwards Torque

Here are some more thoughts by Owen Liang on his theoretical “Liang Forces” which I went over earlier.

Owen Liang makes some great points about how modern physics allows for the creation of complex technology but can’t explain how a simple spinning top rises. He also acknowledges that his theory for how a spinning top rises is highly unlikely, but nonetheless, he represents true scientific exploration!

Owen Liang Mistakenly Assumes That Faster Spinning Speeds Equate to Faster Rising

Owen’s theory that horizontal centrifugal forces are the cause for spinning tops to rise gives the inaccurate notion that faster spin speeds should mean a faster rising time since these horizontal “Liang forces” are greater.

When coming up with theory for anything it is important to test anything and everything that follows from the theory. When assumptions are untested, even seemingly well founded theories can serve as stumbling blocks to true knowledge.

MES BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY: Faster Gyro Spin Speed Does Not Necessarily Mean Faster Rising

As shown earlier, adding weight to a spinning top (or gyroscope) can make it rise faster, but adding a counterweight to try to lift it instead causes it to drop. Such is the counter-intuitive world of gyroscopes.

But this also appears to be the case for faster gyro (or spinning top) spin speeds. The faster spin speed, assuming it is above the spin speed needed to maintain precession, can slow the rate at which the gyroscope rises.

https://youtu.be/mp5JeG0Kt3s

Retrieved: 27 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/xYtIZ

For this particular toy gyroscope, when manually spun up it rises in about 30 seconds.

Using a power drill to increase the spin speed causes the same small toy gyroscope to rise in about double the time.

https://youtu.be/tZ34GDFxYEk

Retrieved: 27 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/ZG79J

Spinning the gyro with a power drill makes it rise in about 1 minute.


This is a very interesting finding that further illustrates the counter-intuitive properties of gyroscopes. Thus, you can’t make any assumptions about gyroscopes without backing it up with experiments!

Gravity as a “Soft Anchor” and Theoretical Liang Axis

Owen Liang extends his theory further by considering the ground support as a “hard anchor support” while the weight of the spinning top due to gravity is the “soft anchor support”. And supposedly the weight is held up by a “supporting force” at the theoretical “Lian Axis” and due to the theoretical “Liang Forces”.

Multiple or Distributed Theoretical Liang Axis and Force

Owen extends his theoretical Liang forces even further by distributing them throughout the spin axis of the spinning top; similar to the summing up of infinite rectangles for integral calculus.

MES Gyroscope Experiments Appear to Contradict Owen’s Theoretical “Liang Forces”

Although this is some very interesting and unique theorizing by the great Owen Liang, as I demonstrated earlier, I believe that my counterweight string gyroscope experiment flips even Owen Liang’s theory upside down, literally.

Gyros drop when they should rise and rise when they should fall… #MirrorWorld

Nonetheless, Owen Liang was on his own in his research as the world was blinded by the hierarchical pyramid scheme known as “peer-reviewed academic science”.

Owen’s First Gyro Space Top Prototype

Here is the first device Owen created which led to the discovery of the gyro space top!

I will go over the tippy top and phi top further in this video; and yes, both also defy “mainstream” physics.

Inspirational and Heart Felt Top Secret Poem

On the last page of his book, Owen Liang wrote one of the most beautiful poems ever written.

Owen Liang, one of the greatest minds this world has ever known, gives rise to the ultimate paradox.

The simplest of objects shatters centuries old conventional overly complicated physics yet discovered by the simplest of minds.

Owen Liang’s Battle with Wikipedia to Get the Gyro Space Top Published

This part of the video was made before Owen Liang's patent got approved, so although it shows the grim reality of publishing game-changing important information on Wikipedia without mainstream accepted references to the information, the silver-lining is that with Owen's now-approved patent, it may actually be possible to get an article or edit published! I will look to do this in the near future too! But nonetheless, this is a great inside-look at the hurdles involved in getting Wikipedia articles or edits to articles published.

Also, getting approved on Wikipedia has as much do to with how you present yourself and your work to the editors as with the actual knowledge you are trying to convey; something which Owen didn’t take into account.

https://youtu.be/ddQjroA_FhA

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/LChqG

Without “expert” approval, articles don’t get published even if they are self-evident in their claims.

https://youtu.be/LwyvAqKXKm4

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/hcQPQ

Wikipedia “Orphans” Articles with No Links from Other Pages

Without links or references, articles get labeled as “orphans” which require further input before getting accepted globally on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/YF8Lw

Wikipedia:Orphan

In the Wikipedia glossary, an orphan is defined as "an article with no links from other pages in the main article namespace". These pages can still be found by searching Wikipedia, but it is preferable that they can also be reachable by links from related pages; it is therefore helpful to add links from other suitable pages with similar and/or related information. De-orphaning articles is an important aspect of building the web.

Would an article that simply states that gyroscopes magically rise be considered an “orphan”?

Owen Liang’s Communications with Wikipedia from August 2015 to June 2016

As expected from the relentless Owen Liang, he makes a Wikipedia profile in hopes of getting his article published, even if it means convincing clueless admins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&profile=all&search=gyrotop&fulltext=1&searchToken=ekdo4li0s79s7f0blkupyydun

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/735RL

From August 2015 to June of 2016, Owen has been trying to get his page and edits approved but to no avail.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gyrotop

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/lVp48

Owen’s Orphan Articles Considered “Spam” and a “Hoax”

The main issue with Wikipedia, as with pretty much all of life, is that the editors focus on bureaucracy while only considering conventional narratives thus any contradiction in facts, be it scientific, political, or especially conspiratorial, will be brushed aside without much thought. But then again, what is one to expect from getting information from nameless, unknown, and unaccountable authors?

“Wikipedia” says gyros don’t rise vs. MES experiments showing they do…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2015_December_8

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/wuvZH

image.png

Wikipedia is Not a Place for Original or Non-Mainstream Research

This thread essentially sums up why Owen Liang couldn’t get his Gyrotop article published. To get on Wikipedia you need to first reference mainstream “journals” or media outlets; which thus begs the question what is the true goal of Wikipedia? Although this makes strategic sense when dealing with millions of articles, the end result is essentially getting the world to collectively document every topic from a uniform narrative, while removing contrary viewpoints, unless of course these “contrary” viewpoints are written about in mainstream sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gyrotop

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/vAkMD

image.png

Possibly unfree File:Apple and spinning top.jpeg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Apple and spinning top.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gyrotop/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Gyrotop/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion".

Speedy deletion nomination of Spinning top secret

A tag has been placed on Spinning top secret requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

Proposed deletion of Space top

No references and no indication of notability.

MES Note: Seriously, what kind of oblivious people are editing Wikipedia pages about topics that they have no direct knowledge of?

Speedy deletion nomination of Space top

Hello Gyrotop,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Space top for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Original Research

Please read the original research policy. Your post to User talk:Ubiquity indicates that you think that you have made a new discovery in physics. Wikipedia is not the place to publish new discoveries in physics. A journal is the usual first place of publication for new science. Alternatively, if you can persuade a reporter for a science magazine such as Discovery, or a science reporter for a major newspaper such as the New York Times that your discovery is worth reporting, Wikipedia can then reference the publication in a journal, magazine, or newspaper. If you are trying to use Wikipedia to sell a toy, read Wikipedia is not for advertising. Your persistence in trying to use Wikipedia either to publish original research or to sell a toy is becoming tendentious. You are at risk of being blocked from editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

MES Note: Mainstream "journals" and media outlets are a requirement to get on Wikipedia; i.e. thus explaining why there is no difference between mainstream outlets and Wikipedia.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tendentious

Retrieved: 10 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/WWRdX

tendentious (comparative more tendentious, superlative most tendentious)

(1) Having a tendency; written or spoken with a partisan, biased or prejudiced purpose, especially a controversial one. quotations ▼
(2) Implicitly or explicitly slanted.

As a supporter of the cause, his reports were tendentious in the extreme.

June 2016

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Angular momentum— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Angular momentum and Talk:Gyroscope. - DVdm (talk) 06:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Gyrotop/sandbox

Hello, Gyrotop. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 09:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Owen Liang Didn’t Help His Case…. LOL

As game-changing as Owen Liang’s Gyro Space Top is, if I were in the shoes of the Wikipedia editors, I too may have blocked this clown HAHAHA

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angular%20momentum&diff=725437683

Retrieved:: 28 March 2019
Archive: http://archive.fo/uIHi0

image.png

LOL

Owen literally put his edit right on top of the “Angular momentum” article, and with a link to his email address… The irony of all this is that as seemingly out of place his edit was, which any admin would delete his post at first glance, his post doesn’t just belong at the top of the Angular momentum page, but front and center of the homepage of Wikipedia itself.

Owen’s Further Communications with Oblivious Admins

Owen was even willing to send his gyro space top to the admins! And I’m still waiting for my space top…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ubiquity/Archive_3

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/QhjJM

Invention

Hi Ubiquity: I would like to send my invention to you for free to verify it is not hoax. Gyrotop — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrotop (talk •contribs) 20:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Please don't. I am not interested in using Wikipedia for purposes other than building an encyclopedia. Also, in the future, please put new correspondence at the BOTTOM of the page (this was at the top, but I moved it), and please sign your remarks with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 21:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

you think my space top is a hoax, so I like to send one to verify it is not. My invention reveals a new knowledge in physics, encyclopedia is the place for knowledge. People need to play my space top realize the knowledge. I am not familiar with Wikepedia, please help me to do it right. thanks for your respond. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrotop (talk • contribs) 21:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

why Levitron top is o.k. at WikipeiA, my space top could not stay. tell me the difference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrotop (talk • contribs) 22:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@Gyrotop: The difference is that the Levitron article has 10 references, and was not written by its inventor. By now at least four people have told you the same thing, when will you start listening to us? ubiquity (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I've cautioned the editor who claims to have made a new discovery in physics to read the original research policy. Unfortunately, I think that this editor may need blocking. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

It's sad but certainly possible. ubiquity (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Robert_McClenon/Archive_11

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/kPd8f

Looking for help for posting a science discovery in Wikipedia.

there could be a historical science mistake in spinning top physics. please take look what this mistake is about in below links. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecu9DFWd7_0 https://sites.google.com/site/spacespinningtop/ My discovery needs to find experts for further investigation. Wikipedia is good place for the job, but my article was always unacceptable. Anyone has a better idea? — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Gyrotop (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

You have previously been warned cautioned not to use Wikipedia to try to advance your original research. If you can't get it published in a journal, try to get it published in a science magazine such as Popular Science or a newspaper. If you want experts, you may look for them at WP:WikiProject Physics. They may agree or disagree with you, and may tell you what is wrong with your conclusions. Please do not use Wikipedia to try to publish original research. Do not insert statements about your original research into existing articles. That almost certainly will result in a block. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Adog104/Archive_1

Retrieved: 8 May 2018
Archive: https://archive.li/kmfNa

Space top

The article was speedied a couple of times, but I think you can still see a video of it:File:Space top.webm. Probably that file should be deleted too, but I don't know how to do it. ubiquity (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Me neither, but I did find this page which I think its how to delete the file @Ubiquity: if you want me to nominate it; and seems like a nice science invention that a teacher would show off, but it should be marked since its now an orphan. Adog104 Talk to me 22:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

my article is similar to Levitron, why my space top has to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrotop (talk • contribs) 22:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@Gyrotop:Presuming if the above is from the user who I marked earlier. I marked it for a speedy deletion due to it being written as a promotion for a product/patent that you may or may not own (which is WP:G11) and I marked it as it had not indicated why the product important besides that "this is my product and here's information about how to get it" (which is WP:A7). However your product seems to resemble a Gyroscope, just only created by yourself, which isn't really your product, but a recreation of something that has already been created (which I'll give you props for creating it, it did seem cool). Adog104 Talk to me 22:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

This sounds like a bad comedy movie, if only the stakes weren’t so high…

Please Help by Posting on Wikipedia or Emailing Mainstream Outlets on My Behalf

If you would like to help out, the best way would be to start sharing some of the gyro magic MES Experiments unto Wikipedia and other mainstream sources! For example, send my videos of gyroscopes magically rising on ice to every professor of every university or mainstream media science writers you can think of!

Also make sure to utilize my videos and Owen’s patent as references and help flip the “angular momentum” Wikipedia page upside down with real science. Let’s finish what Owen Liang started.


View All Parts

Part 1: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-video-1-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept
Part 2: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-2
Part 3: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-3

Part 4: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-4

Part 5: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-5
Part 6: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-6
Part 7: https://steemit.com/antigravity/@mes/antigravity-part-6-objects-in-rotation-defy-mainstream-physics-mes-duality-concept-notes-7

Full #AntiGravity Video Series: https://mes.fm/antigravity-playlist


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!