RE: No, You Are Not An Introvert
Your personal opinion and experience is rather irrelevant.
Irrelevant or not I'm an Introvert and I know what I'm talking about, on the other hand you are NOT an Introvert and you HAVE NO CLUE what you are talking about.
This is mumbo jumbo.
this is why we have science.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129862/
The above is the only full article and beyond the "Abstract" is worth reading the "Discussion" and maybe the "Introduction" if you have time. Oversimplyfication is that Extroverts are like "Junkies" they "are geting high" in social interactions.
Some more abstracts below with diferences between Introverts Extroverts. That was a quick google search, I'm sure there is more out there.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1599997
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18036080
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00917.x/full
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01627.x/full
You can't possibly make that deduction.
The abstracts don't say anything. I made specific arguments in my post that debunks them. I am aware of the literature. Instead of using google try to tackle my points with your own words. Throwing links means nothing. Same applies if you handed me a paper in college. You need to learn to argue properly.
Your dogmatism is off the charts, or is it your ego?
Anyway, no point in arguing any more...
You have yet to provide any arguments to my point. You just use google copy-pasta and cheerleading others in other posts.
Ain't gonna cut it with me pal.
Stop pestering me with more of your bullshit, I already have wasted too much time with your nonsense.
You seem frustrated boy. Try to up your game. The "I am an introvert because I am" doesn't cut it :)
Which part of my previous post you didn't understand?