Towards A Better Tomorrow : Part 4 - The Final Destination

in #anarchy8 years ago (edited)


Anarchism, Voluntaryism, Socialism, Capitalism, Communism!

All these systems are based on a fairy-tale we tell ourselves about scarcity.

There is nothing in this world that is scarce in the least.
For everything you can cite about something "being scarce", I can demonstrate conclusively that it is not.
For any given resource, product or service, what we have is not a supply problem, it's a distribution problem.

We've heretofore attempted to solve both the supply and the distribution problems with money.
Now that we've solved the supply problem, money itself has become the actual problem in the distribution equation.

We invented this "money" tool, close to 10,000 years ago and it has served us well for millennia.
We literally don't know anything different in this world anymore.

Money is not evil, but it's a flawed concept because no one really understands what it is.
Flawed though it may be, it does still serve a valid purpose, until we find a better way to fix the distribution equation.

It's not convenient for a farmer to haul chickens or produce everywhere he goes, and a Dr would have a very hard time performing surgery in the middle of the grocery store.

So barter fails on that account.

Time based currencies including those inherent in communism and socialism fail, because all they do is reclassify time and effort into something of equal value and they are most assuredly not equal.

If my child needs immediate, life saving emergency treatment; There is no amount of anything in the world that I would value more than this service. This is something that I would be willing to obtain at any cost, and I do mean ANY cost up to and including my own soul.

My home, all of my future earnings, I would burn my entire world to ash if that's what it took. Literally nothing in this world would be more highly valued than this one single service, by this one single person.

On the other hand, if my car needs a new engine, I may have to take some time to think about that.

Yet I spend more time with the car, than the child.

Money represents not a store of "value" but a store of "labor".

For x units of any currency, you can acquire the fruits of almost anyone's labor.

Where all of these 'ism's begin to fail is when you separate the person from their labor or skill.
You can just print unlimited sums of cash or other forms of currency in order to fuel economic "growth".

Economic growth has another term, "wealth transfer".
You transfer money from the future to the present when you print cash that is unearned.
This act is obliging someone's future economic output to the present, either by inflation or taxes.

It gets worse when you consolidate the power to do this into the hands of a very few.

But what is wealth really?

Wealth is the ability to accomplish the dictates of your own will.

Money is not actually wealth, it is merely a claim on the future energy of other people.
Energy which you control, but only so long as the others allow it.

Capitalism, Socialism, Communism, every other "ism" is based on this concept of obliging and binding the future to support the needs and wants of the present time.

This was at one time necessary because goods and services could not be produced and delivered upon demand.
Crops come in once a year, babies take a few months to gestate and a few years to raise, etc.
Yet certain things such as automobiles, computers etc are produced most efficiently when production rates are steady.
All of these can be built on demand now, if you have the resources, whereas things that require life also require time.

These timing differentials introduce massive energy inefficiencies into the market place.

Money solves this by providing an ondemand store of "labor".
Labor is just the energy of others.

On the small scale, you can get around this inefficiency with all kinds of moneyless systems.

But moneyless systems, fail to account for human greed.

Capitalism works as well as it does because it leverages greed in a positive way and as long as government stays out of the way, the market will tend to correct inefficiencies. However the natural path for all capitalistic systems is to evolve towards consolidation. This is because it is much more efficient to utilize energy resources when doing so at economies of scale.

Thus consolidation rather than competition is the natural evolution of any marketplace, even freemarkets.

This begins to push companies into a monopoly position and means capitalism is unsustainable, because eventually in any capitalist system, you end up with fascism. A condition in which a handful of large companies own the government, which is precisely what America has become now.

Make no pretense about any representative republic and freemarket capitalism in America, we are now a fascist police state and have been for half a century or more.

Yet almost no one alive today remembers anything different.

Any system of government is equally effective so long as you can trust your leaders to act in your best interests.
This only works so long as your interests and the interests of your leaders align.

You can't put a person into a place of authority and expect them not to corrupt and or serve their own interests. No matter how hard they try, the temptation will always be there and one day they will take that step and fall.

So what's the actual answer?
It can't happen overnight. It won't be a bloody revolution, nor will it be a Malthusian crisis that wipes out humanity.
We're actually on the right path to the correct answer.

Division of labor itself is gradually going away.
Goods and services are being produced and provided by robotics and AI.
Beyond that which we can produce ourselves, very soon we will all be beggars, including those who have the most money right now. In reality the rich will fall long before the middle class does, because the middle class has the skills to create things and the tools to fix the things. We have the tools to endure, what the others cannot even in the absence of anything resembling a free and fair market.

As this erosion of our "core values" occurs.
The health and well being of people will become our primary concern and beyond that, production of the "absolutely unique" will become paramount. Meaning in the short term, we will be moving over to a patronage model, as everyone from top to bottom loses their jobs and learns to find other ways to feed themselves and their families.

There may be some bloodshed and rioting as governments cannot keep up the bread and circuses, but eventually the final answer in this puzzle is that "anything that you can buy, will be designed by AI and built by robots".

Thus a change of focus in order to value the unique, the one of a kind; also known as patronage.
Steemit is an example of this patronage model in action, albeit a very early model.

The only other question left is "Who will own the robots and who will control the AI?".
Short term it will be the richest, but you can also build them at home if you like.
Nothing is stopping you, so it might be a really good idea to get handy with these...

Knowledge of how things work and how to build them, is where real wealth is even now, and with it you can outcompete even those with the most money.

In the long term of around 50 to 100 years, there will no longer be a need for division of labor.
Truthfully there will no longer be a need for big clunky robots to build things either.

If you live 50 years more, you will at some point get "the last shot you ever need".
A re-programmable nano-enhanced immune system. Something this intimate will eventually succumb to your will just like your immune system does now.

In fact you may not be aware of this, but your entire immune system was acquired not evolved. Dangerous pathogens were tamed, harnessed and reprogrammed to provide you with the various tools and skills of the modern immune system.

Upgrading this to be re-programmable, is the most natural extension to evolution that one can imagine.
We already have the hardware, now we're just sussing out whatever language it was was programmed in.

There is literally nothing that bio-nano tech cannot do for you, once you are able to fully control it.

What is a world like where instead of driving a car made by someone else, you download plans off the internet and set your bots to work building it from the midden heap in your backyard?


We already use inductive charging systems such as Qi to recharge our phones and tablets,
Why not our cellular machinery as well? How far out do you think this is? I say 20 - 25 years.

What does the world become, when instead of consuming food produced by someone else, you grow a solar panel on your front lawn and adapt your cellular machinery to extract energy from the environment directly from whatever sources are handy?

Instead of needing shelter and warmth built and provided by someone else, you change the environment and build your own home to suit your tastes and needs...

Pretty much we survive like we always have, by adapting our environment to ourselves, except now we do it..
atom by atom


We can do this already, we just don't know how to control it properly... yet

When you can literally build anything and everything you need, by direct extraction and manipulation of the environment atom by atom. What do you need money or even government for?

Your Knowledge and Creativity ARE both the Present and the Future of what it means to be Wealthy!
Perhaps it's time you recognized just how wealthy you really are?

This is part 4 of a multipart series, one I thought I could do in just a couple of days. There are many, many more of these coming, but if you've read this far, you should read these first...

Part 1: https://steemit.com/life/@williambanks/towards-a-better-tomorrow-part-1-there-but-for-grace
Part 2: https://steemit.com/life/@williambanks/towards-a-better-tomorrow-part-2-what-in-the-hell-happened-to-us
Part 3: https://steemit.com/life/@williambanks/towards-a-better-tomorrow-part-3-the-biggest-heist-in-history

Sort:  

@williambanks

You are one of the few people I follow. I like people who can think outside the box while retaining an all around knowledge on life.

When it comes to what is "better" I don't think it has to do with technology. I lived with indigenous societies and they are quite happy. Modernism and technology some needs only to give birth to exponentially more. We know this since the dawn of time and more recently since the industrial revolution.

This also explains why while we tripled our lifespan and made so much progress, we are still unhappy, plaqued with depression, popping pills like M&Ms.

In Japan they consider some form of struggle and suffering to be virtuous. This is not true in the western world. We avoid struggle at all costs. This is though contra to even our own physiology. We have to strain both our minds and body in order to be healthy. Modernism takes us away from this struggle by offering us more and more solutions. We end up torturing our own self because we really do not have any real problems to deal with.

Perhaps we will one day become cyborgs, escape our biological entities and venture as ONE through the stars. For what reason, I honestly do not know.

Thanks! I consider that a great honor. I know what I'm saying sounds like we all become cyborgs and poof all our problems are gone. That's really not it at all. The reality is that we encounter a new class of problems, but eventually we learn to overcome those as well.


I believe the future of humanity looks like this...

Although when I consider what a self portrait from the future might look like for me personally, I imagine it looks like more like this...

So this quote out of your essay marathon is essentially very reaveling: "There is literally nothing that bio-nano tech cannot do for you, once you are able to fully control it."

Control. There it is. Control is power, and some may say that's the real wealth someone can accumulate is how much control he/she has over others. It's neat how you added that quote over self ownership. Forget money for a moment, just think how controlling and powerful a sympathetic wordsmith can be.

Hence it better to talk about currency and not money. Money tends to make you lonley, moody and loony. Currency has phonetics which are more universally understandable, it metaphors with currents of a sea. Why else would finance talk about liquidity and frozen assets etc.. I didn't come up with this spinsters twists, but a very deep audio book called "the golden web" on YouTube by ChironLast introduced me to this rabbit hole.

Back to control. Is it a illusion? Some neuroscientisys say our brain made a fraction of second it's decicion before we are aware of it, suggesting we are not in control. I would say they are looking at the wrong place. Not being romantic, the heart has it's own neural network and is way more powerful than the brain in our head... Just spreading some seeds for thought....

@williambanks , I unfortunately missed the first three of your towards a better tomorrow series. I will go up-vote them when I have some more voting power. As always VERY fascinating stuff. I love the way that your brain works! BTW, I have an interesting "Sunday" post, which I will love you to read and comment on, whenever you have some time.

This is my favorite part: "Knowledge of how things work and how to build them, is where real wealth is even now, and with it you can outcompete even those with the most money."
Just had to repost it to stress it importance/significance. Damn I feel rich now! :)

EXCELLENT post. While I might disagree with you on some details I whole heartedly agree with your conclusion. In my (not so humble) opinion, the main (inf not only) reason that the West (in particular the US) has managed to maintain what freedom we have is that Government is stupid. Innovation and technological advancement is advancing faster than government can understand it, and thus pass laws controlling it.

For example. No one saw the internet coming. It snuck up on them and become entrenched before they knew what was happening. That's GOOD!

3D printing, and other technologies is doing the same thing.....RIGHT NOW.

The future is looking so bright that I need shades.
in the long run.
In the short run...not so much.

I agree 1000%
The answer to that is to recognize that government is a tool of the people and when it ceases to function as a tool of the will of the people then it ceases to have any legitimacy whatsoever.

You address this by either working directly within the system by running for office and getting generally politically active. Or you operate outside the system and refuse to recognize the authority of this or any other government over your person or your property.

There is a concept embedded in our laws based on a natural law called "Adverse Possession". I believe it's a nice middle ground. Operating within the bounds of the law to reclaim that which has been denied to us by law.

I explain this in my next posting on towards a better tomorrow.

In my opinion government is a disease. It's not immediately fatal but countries tend to grow beyone all reason then die.
From my research in the matter anytime the cognitive limit of Dunbar's Number is exceeded things begin to degrade. The further past that limit the worse it becomes. The Iron Law and the other Iron Law are instructive.

I suspect that we will continue to have difficulty as long as states are more powerful than individuals , or clans.

Well I mostly agree with you except for Dunbar's Number. That number is pretty arbitrary. There are CEOs in organizations in the thousands that know the name and family of everyone who works for them and are highly effective at finding hidden gems in their organization.
They are rare and exceptional, but only because they actually put forth the effort.

Once a politician loses sight of the people who voted for him/her that's when politics falls apart. But there are tribes which number in the thousands and have none of the problems we have. On the other hand those tribes have no concept of private property or ownership rights either.

It may actually have more to do with Amdahls Law than any specific number. The more parallel tasks there are that need to be completed, the more opportunity there is for fulfilling work to be accomplished. People just want to be valued.

In a way the future I see just reflects that. When everyone's "labors" have zero value then money too has zero value. At this point everything we know and understand about money and power go out the window.

Yet it leaves open the opportunity for truly free trade.

Here is a car I built from my midden heap, made exclusively for you.
Here is a painting I made exclusively for you.

No obligations in a trading situation like that. Everyone is on equal footing because you no longer have "need" of anything, just want. And I imagine that the want will be the efforts of another person who is not yourself.

This is what I mean by patronage.

When production labor has 0 value, individual effort becomes priceless.

For purposes of this conversation lets assume that Dunbar's number follows a normal distribution. The much maligned Bell Curve

.

Some people, like me, and only 'empathize' with twenty or thirty people.(I have an odd memory, I've know it for some time, there are other oddities that I won't go into) Some exceptional people, like the CEO's you spoke of (and I have an FB friend who claims to be so) can 'empathize' with thousands of people.

My type of memory and his type of memory are on opposite sides of the curve. The middle of the curve is said to be 'about' 150 to 200' (but you knew that) The actual number is not really important. The fact is though

one death is a tragedy while a million deaths is a statistic

Everyone we KNOW is one of US
Everyone we don't KNOW is not us...they're them.
We can't help but think of and treat THEM, different from US.
It's very easy to think of THEM as less than us...less than human. In fact it's damn hard NOT too.
and that's insane. I mean that's really crazy.

yup..that's the point.

dealing with crowds, beyond the cognitive limit, is crazy making. It can be done (poorly) The larger the number the worst it gets. Sometimes it gets totally out of control and genocide results. (during the twentieth century 300 million people died due to the actions of their OWN governments...not counting war...that's CRAZY)

Just looked up Amdahl's law...never heard it called that but I agree.

One more thing. My favorite term is 'Highly Redundant, Widely Distributed, and Massively Parallel"...in other words NOT CENTRALIZED.

I agree money is not evil. Otherwise, back to bartering and we have not time to steemit. It's the evil people that made it evil. ever realise that evil spelled backwards is live. seems, it's part of live then.:-)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.16
JST 0.031
BTC 60623.84
ETH 2572.69
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.57