You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Empire strikes back II
Someone not wanting me to enter their house would be a good example of a border you may set personally though you don't agree with borders or you'd prefer no borders if you burned the walls down what would prevent people from taking your stuff? Would you put your name on it? Wouldn't the branding be a barrier of sort... Security is a big part of sanity... not to say a 50' Wall around our nation would allow me to sleep better since it's disturbing to think about wanting out after then...
Because I do not agree with state borders; politicians jurisdiction lines, I don't recognise the border of speed of light or cultural borders?
Like I would ask the widow to dance at a funeral? There are many kind of borders. I do not agree that a stranger; a useless idiot can draw a border around me and threaten me death if I do not obey the threats he made up, just like this line he drew around me. And he tells me extorting my property from me to pay for being my master and threatening me is the top achievement of human kind. If I do not get it, I'm dumb and uncivilized? It is absolutely desirable and necessary to protect what is yours. Especially from parasites like politicians who hallucinate they own everything in a country including you. They don't add or create anything. Everything they do is paid by stolen property. If you turn resources into something that wasn't and want to protect it, of course you should. It is your property. You cannot order people around, threatening them death if they don't recognize their property is yours. Only a politician can do it and no one can give this right to them, because no one has it. Some imaginary collective does not own an imaginary line on the Globe. You own your things as an individual. You can create a community. You cannot force anyone to be in this community. I have no idea what you mean by "our nation". It can only be true if you believe a politician owns every inch on the planet. If you want a master to forbid people crossing an imaginary line, what will you do if you want to invite your friends over and your master says no? What human has the right to tell me I cannot move freely? Seems like you are confused, as if there was only Merica out there... but let's take individuals living in geo coordinates we call US as an example... someone wants to cross oceans in their kayaks and invade 100 million armed, decentralised individuals who formed voluntary communities? Only governments are dumb enough to warmonger and slaughter. It's not like the lawmakers will be fighting to "protect" you from their own decisions? They won't even ask for any kind of permission from you. Just call FED/IMF, put every new born in hundred thousand $ debt to pay trillions for a genocide machine. Slaughtering away for your freedom? If your "representatives" will not misrepresent their slaves like this, who will? Do you really need to give the power to control my life (which you do not have) to the worst people; sociopathic actors, to protect yourself from the bogeyman who might want to control you? Do it to yourself. Just don't do it to me, please ;)
I'm meant our nation erroneously assuming you and I lived in the same country... region... wtfe...Damn internet... I'm all for self governance but you know the whole world wouldn't achieve anarchy at once if successful at all... If one were to start a country on a barge or magical sudden inhabitable giant island rich with all sorts of resources vegetive mineral ect. What way would be used to prevent general evil wouldn't there be rules... Or laws rather seems like a slippery slope... I've heard of anarchist using the Hippocratic oath (do no harm) is an oath allegiance?... What do you do with violators telling people what to do... Kick em out? If there were no boundaries what would stop other empires from depriving the land without compensation... I'm just saying a splash of governance isn't bad
It's cool bro. Rules achieved through consensus, voluntarily are different from imposed ones. Authority is fine, as long as you choose it voluntarily. No one can force you to be a part of a community with rules, you do not want to be a part of. It is called slavery. The world doesn't have to do anything, apart from wanting a government to compete in their "services" with private sector. The obsolete medieval nonsense, will dissolve itself within a year, as there will be very little participants. Can you think of any government program that cannot be provided better, by free market competing for their customers, offering ever better and cheaper services? A bank if they want to be secured, they hire a security company.
There is no oath. We only recognize the natural law every 3YO starts comprehending. When you take a toy from a kid, the kid cries. If you are healthy, you feel discomfort. So does 99,99% of people. The ones who don't want to rule and if they are lucky, they become politicians, who are paid actors. NAP (Non Aggression Principle) It is the same as "the golden rule" Don't do to others what you don't want done to you. Simple. No one has the right to use violence against you. You can defend yourself. A splash of government will always end in tyranny as history proves every single time. Once you give a bunch of people rights you do not have to give, they have higher rights than every human. This power attracts sociopaths who will always abuse this power. If you allow someone to control lives, free trade, there will always be people who will sponsor these sociopaths to write special rights for them. Good talk. I'm happy to discuss anything else you might want to talk about