You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: “Defining Voluntaryism” - No, private property is not “optional” (addressing @lukestokes)
I did. Only to be told I was not focusing on ideas and principles, but people. My reply to @novacadian is about the fact that ISO is private property. I did not say there were no gray areas in regard to private property issues. It is not hard to understand. Thanks for your input.