Hats off to you telos. It's nice to see someone thinking on his own instead of accusing people of not thinking on their own.

Voluntaryism is interesting and Robert Murphy is brilliant, but this argument of his does not stand. He claims any people noble enough to resolve differences through democracy would be equally capable of resolving issues without government.

This claim is not true because a democratic government forces people into non-aggression solutions (even though this seems contradictory). This use of force by the majority that institutes the government may well prevent the minority to use even greater force to impose their ways. Put plainly, a democracy doesn't need to have a population as resonable as voluntaryist society.