You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Voluntaryism in Social Constructs, does it stand undeviating or does it adopt the Rulez?
Offer and acceptance.
Steemit has offered for use of its platform services. We accept terms and conditions by using it. Essentially steem could goto hell, and cannot be made liable. (Reading terms of service and acceptance). All are essential elements in a contract. Even the way its worded is contractual. Social contract.
Steem is a social construct within Steemit. It is also not a tangible capital formation in and of its self, which makes it rising and falling or gone to hell kind of a obvious condition, unless your unaware of the nature of non-tangible capital formations.
;)
I was thinking more along lines 1 usc 83(a) as a form of "income" because we contractually give goods - services to an US company. You're correct though, should have chosen better fitting words.
Shoot, your, doing fine, I don't necessarily care to be right or wrong, but just hoping this thing called Steemit can be clearly understood.
Do we (users) actually 'give goods' though? We present thoughts ideas and concepts, maybe share experience, but we have the ability to erase all we present*, so maybe there is a time component. This is really strange compared to what the 'company' side of the platform is, because the value on that side, (from what I have read about other platforms) reaps value from traffic and investment, which are two separate constructs.
*except maybe direct monetary investments
Good points, have you looked at white and bluepaper?
I had read them months ago, I just re-read them. Have you had a chance to watch the video that had chance processes explaining accumulation?
If so, how would you describe Steemit? One of distributed Token per value exchange, or chance process accumulation?
(https://steemit.com/anarchy/@joesal/the-pareto-problem-and-capitalism)
Give me a bit and I'll circle back. Haven't read bluepaper yet. Will then, read link. Be a while.
No worries, take all the time ya need.