RE: Not Kokesh for "Not President" (Part 1 of 2)
you people, as a result of your belligerence, will simply see Adam shift over to the Minarcho side. All he needs to do is recognize the validity of this vid by Andy "petition" Jacobs of the Libertarian Revolution YT channel.
And to assure no local monopoly on any WELL REGULATED MILITIA, we can simultaneously implement something the Oath Keepers.org have through the Volunteer Fire Department.
https://www.oathkeepers.org/cpt-community-preparedness-teams/security/
The LP and the minarchos are NOT going away, in spite of your presentations. Many see the need for public ownership of "cops, courts and clerks", whereas the anarchoVol THEORETICAL prescriptions for these services have not been enough to convince enough libertarians any sort of justice system will be adequate to replace the English Common Law model.
Now you can pick on Adam all day long, in regard to your take on his personality and his alleged personal ambitions. But what he proposes could be promoted with any personality type.
If he shifts....it's his own choice. One can not make others responsible. He's a grown man and responsible for his own choices.
An example how mere words can not make a person responsible for the deeds or actions of the other;
If I punch you in the face it's your own choice...then you should have not make me feel angry with the words you said.
Recognize the validity? According to who?
All actions have consequences. Consistency matters too. It may have been painful, but I've pointed out inconsistencies before. Some "friends" were lost because of it too. This isn't about anyone, not any individual or group of individuals. This is about individual liberty instead! If you do something contrary to it, you are being inconsistent. I'm not saying this about any particular person either. No one needs "the English Common Law" model. The concepts we support are pretty simple: Do not harm others, do not harm their property, and keep your word.
Do not harm others, do not harm their property, and keep your word
and when someone decides to violate the above, then what? And I am not interested in arguing. Just be quiet and show us. Build a community and just show us. Thanks.
It has been explained numerous times already by thousands of people.
There would be common law courts made up of volunteers from the community. They are not paid and they have no special protections. There are no double standards between them and the rest of the people. Those people hold law breakers accountable, and the people who refuse to abide by their rulings lose the protection of the court.
Those people become outlaws and would be hunted as such. There are not that many predators among us, and the system we have now allows those predators to take positions within the system to rule over others. Haven't you ever wondered why so many police abuse their spouses? How so many religious leaders abuse their followers? How many politicians abuse their power? The pattern is pretty clear to me.
Governance without government and rules without rulers is the objective.
what part of SHOW ME; DON'T TELL ME is that difficult to comprehend? All you do is provide WORDS. Anyone can contrive things with words. Show me what you mean. Show us how this works. I know what the objective is. Can this objective, once put into practice actually protect private property and life, itself? Now please. Don't continue attempting to persuade me by more words. SHOW ME. Until you do, your political THEORY shall continue to be discussed by a few in the midst of the Grand Canyon, all by yourselves. Is that your desire?
Anarchy is all around us. 99.9% of human interaction is voluntary and peaceful. What's not to see? You must be blind. Do you think countless laws are what keep people peaceful and their interactions voluntary? Go to any crowded place, and look for yourself. I don't need to show you a damned thing.
no. you don't. In either case, at least the convo is over. Thanks for the interaction. It was fun.
lol @ “you people.”
Nobody is “picking on Adam.”
The plan has serious flaws and elements of the campaign are seriously questionable.
Also, there is nothing “THEORETICAL” about ISO. Any more than air, water, mountains are “theoretical.”
your guitar playing really sucks when outside your "specialty" zone. And hey, it might even suck there, too. Who knows? How did you get into the Blues, originally?
Think you may be on the wrong thread.