Sort:  

A bit misleading right? For instance if, without government, every individual killed only 10 people that would be 70 billion.

Hehe, the thing here is that the most people dont randomly shoot others...
I dont want to be shot so i dont shoot if i dont have to. I´m pretty shure most people are like this.
So after the first few violent idots where shot, it would be pretty peacefull I assume.
But there are problems, which brings us to the top of the page... see what I did here xD

I assume

That's a pretty big assumption to base 70 billion peoples' lives on...

there are less than seven billion people alive
your arguement is invalid.

Yeah, thats the thing about not knowing something.
But i´m shure you will enlighten us about the true circumstances.

Youre right, of course it would be less violent than today. At least in the long Term.
But i think people would still keep fighting over resources or just the view to the lake.
My Question is more like "is there a way to get real peace?"
A way to enable humans to solve this problems with intelligence?

Dunbar's number suggests that any group larger than about one hundred and fifty goes insane. At the very least they begin to exhibit behavior that would be classified as insane by a rational person. Emphiracl research, called rat utopia, by some supports this concept. The Behavioral Sinks thus exhibited correlate closely with observed behavior in cities.

Thank you, never heard of Dunbar´s number... Things like this i´m looking for.
It makes sense to me that a group only can be stable if everyone knows everyone.
Then even the currency system has a potetial solution. a "fei lun" like system.
Its a kind of biological blockchain :)
Know we just need a way to interact with other groups without "clanwars" an were done.
easy peasy xD

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.031
BTC 59518.70
ETH 2604.65
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48