On Civil Disobedience
Read Ben's book here (pdf), or listen to it here (MP3). Image credit.
badquaker.com
twitter.com/BadQuakerBen
rights, go to badquaker.com, and, as always, thank you for reading.
rights, go to badquaker.com, and, as always, thank you for reading.
Laws are meant to be broken. The whole progress of human societies is based on the often violent replacement of the previous rulers. The question is whether you choose to defy them as a way of changing the current situation or to demonstrate the necessity of further law enforcement parties
I appreciate that you oppose corrupt government. We share that. Anarchy remains a low information solution that is too unstable and entropic to form complex societies. It is only fit to briefly displace any other society form because it is so weak that virtually every other society form out-competes it. This has been true throughout history, throughout the world with no useful counter examples that you can name. Anarchy is not even remotely a 'new' idea.
In information warfare, it is often the goal to cause the adversary to expend time, effort and resources on low value things to gain attrition advantage. Expending the time and resources of motivated people seeking change and improvement on something that has no real chance of success is something I would expect from the deep state or globalists like Soros.
I see no meaningful difference in the effect of your actions or theirs. Are you intentionally aligning with their agendas?