Thanks!!
For clarity, anarchy does not necessitate no form of government. It doesn't necessitate no rule or law. It DOES necessitate no rulers. The difference is whether the administrative agent is simply that, or is coercive. As soon as it's coercive, it's overstepped and become the state. So you can still be an anarchist and embrace an idea of some form of administration/governing body. They just can't have authority over the people.
Reams have been written on the practicality of this. There are challenges, but the questions are whether freedom is preferable to coercion and if conditions under the known tyrrany of the state are better than the unknown challenges of an society without rulers.