Jurisdiction: Where does it come from?

Many people believe that jurisdiction must come from the voluntary consent of the governed. But this isn't true, Just ask William Wallace; oh that's right he was drawn and quartered at the end of the Movie Braveheart.

Many people believe that they have a right to a fair trial, but that is a fiction which requires fealty to written law or to a monarch who affords such luxuries.

There is only one Absolute Right in this world that is NOT based on written law. That is the Right of Conquest or the Ability to Conquer a rival for those Extortionary Powers.

The Right of Conquest exists for us all. We all have the same rights as Genghis Kahn, Alexander, Augustus, Constantine, Charlemagne, The III Percenters, George Washington, Napoleon, Hugo Chavez and Joseph Roberts. But me?.... Without exercising those rights I have immensely less responsibility and problems... but if you're feeling froggy you too can jump, rebel and rule from the ashes here but without my support; nay... with my active resistance because what we have today is far better than any world an Ancap will produce or an Ancom will provide.

But if you do get froggy and attempt your own independence, there are a few extortionist competetors you'd have to fend off as well.

In the United States we threw off the chains of a Tyrannical Monarch of favor of self rule.

This is the goal of many Anarchists - Independence and Self Rule but in a Country of 300 Million it is now impossible without affecting someone else as you endeavor to provide for yourself and your family, independently.

We have a unique opportunity that I've heard many people want to squander.

Our government is still here to maintain personal freedoms to speak, to travel, to assemble, and to own property, encouraging people to create new businesses and grow the old ones.

Jurisdiction and Original Titles to the Patents for our lands in America has been created by Conquest of the Colonies originally Conquered by Great Britain, by Conquering the Western Territories from Mexico and the Indian Territories directly from them, by conveyance from France for Louisiana and Spain for Florida and Conquering the other island nations around the globe. We even tried and failed with Canada.

Jurisdiction has been delegated from the Territories to the Federal Union. A Public corporation Named United States of America subsequently delegated limited Separate Jurisdictions to the 50 States comprising the Union and down the line to Counties, Parishes and Municipalities within each State. The Federal Union still controls all jurisdiction in its non state territories.

Evidence of these jurisdictions is in the wars and blood shed to maintain this rule of law and by the very Legal Descriptions written to describe the physical limits thereof. Evidence of acquiescence to this jurisdiction is simply the mere fact of ones existence with the domain legally described not whether someone has agreed to be governed; for unless he is in active rebellion as William Wallace was (who had the opportunity to Sack London), then it can be said that he agrees with the law of the land.

Ergo, based on the ancient Right of Conquest and the rules set up by the beneficiaries of that Conquest in America, the United States of America's constitution is a covenant running with the land binding all those who inhabit it either by residence or by occupancy.

I have not seen it codified or even an accepted fact that the State must show that a criminal defendant has peacefully acquiesced to legitimize the State's Jurisdiction that was gained by earlier Right of Conquest or Treaty with a previous Jurisdiction.

I'm trying to make the case, however, that George Washington could have taken America and set himself up as a king but instead he and the other founders set up a self ruling republic with a written constitution and by-laws (statutes), opposing the pre-existing international world view that might has right, but relying on it for legitimacy in International Law.

The Right of Conquest still has its place in International law in recognizing other nations, as well as domestic law for upholding title to our lands otherwise our's is illegitimate and the natives progeny still have a claim to it otherwise.

So if you're going to be an Anarchist in America you're going to need to pay off the local Tribe of Native Americans in your area.

Thank you out to @garthfreeman for his input on this.